Método 3, Marcos Aragão Correia and the campaign to discredit Gonçalo Amaral.

[misty]

You really are being slow.

The evidence is there.

Now get over it.

Your typing won't change that.

So with caps lock on....


CORREIA WAS EMPLOYED BY METODO3 TO GO AFTER AMARAL ON BEHALF OF THE MCCANNS.

So, you cannot supply the link ergo it's just supposition on your part.

[Alice Purjorick]

What do you mean by the evidence hasn't been weighed?  Surely the evidence was assessed at some point before the case was archived and the archiving report makes it clear that there was a lack of evidence of any crime committed by the McCanns.

1. It needs to weighed by a court unless we are playing silly buggars at a low level with a pretend court.
All the evidence hasn't been weighed by a court as balance of probablities is restricted to civil matters but the issue being investigated was criminal ? That seems to be paradoxical but that is how it has been presented thus far.
2. That has been done to death on here every few days. What did the report really say?

[Alfie]

1. It needs to weighed by a court unless we are playing silly buggars at a low level with a pretend court.
All the evidence hasn't been weighed by a court as balance of probablities is restricted to civil matters but the issue being investigated was criminal ? That seems to be paradoxical but that is how it has been presented thus far.
2. That has been done to death on here every few days. What did the report really say?

What is this "playing at silly buggars" accusation?  Did no one within the judicial process evaluate the evidence, yes or no?  I suggest you dig out the report and re-read it if you want to know what it says.  Something very close to what I wrote I think, but I was going by memory.

[stephen25000]

So, you cannot supply the link ergo it's just supposition on your part.

Anyone who is not attached to the Mccann's will see  exactly what Correia was doing, as well as those who employed him.

[misty]

Anyone who is not attached to the Mccann's will see  exactly what Correia was doing, as well as those who employed him.

So you are saying that only those not connected to the McCanns have the knowledge & ability to interpret Metado3 & Correia's actions?
You must be such a killjoy at a magic show.

[stephen25000]

So you are saying that only those not connected to the McCanns have the knowledge & ability to interpret Metado3 & Correia's actions?
You must be such a killjoy at a magic show.

Most people are not attached or support the McCann's.

[sadie]

Most people are not attached or support the McCann's.

Well that is news tio me.

Amongst my friends and associates, only one 'friend' has any doubts about the Mccanns

And she is a raving commi.

[stephen25000]

Well that is news tio me.

Amongst my friends and associates, only one 'friend' has any doubts about the Mccanns

And she is a raving commi.

That's hearsay, just as with your stories Sadie.

[misty]

Most people are not attached or support the McCann's.

Look at it from a slightly different perspective. Do you think Amaral wouldstill have been convicted if Leonor had had a lawyer who wasn't in any way connected to Metado3?

[stephen25000]

Look at it from a slightly different perspective. Do you think Amaral wouldstill have been convicted if Leonor had had a lawyer who wasn't in any way connected to Metado3?

Isn't that speculation ?

Remind me, who was convicted of 'torture' ?

[misty]

Isn't that speculation ?

Remind me, who was convicted of 'torture' ?

Amaral was convicted for falsifying documents, not torture. There must have been clear evidence he did so as he was present at the station immediately after LC "threw herself down the stairs" & knew which 2 officers were with her.

[stephen25000]

Amaral was convicted for falsifying documents, not torture. There must have been clear evidence he did so as he was present at the station immediately after LC "threw herself down the stairs" & knew which 2 officers were with her.

I know perfectly well what his conviction was for.

Are you implying he was involved in 'torture' ?

If you are , back it up.

[sadie]

That's hearsay, just as with your stories Sadie.

Are you calling me a liar?  I have made mistakes as everyone on here has, but I have always tried to correct them.

Show me where I have lied.



If I say I met Marcos Aragao Correia and spent some time with him, having dinner with him twice, then I did.   Full stop.

I have seen him in his Lawyers role.   I can assure you that he would demolish you in a matter of minutes and spit the pieces out.  And i am not being rude, that is a fact. 


No hearsay about that.   I witnessed it.

[misty]

I know perfectly well what his conviction was for.

Are you implying he was involved in 'torture' ?

If you are , back it up.

No, you said torture; I only spoke about his conviction & the reason for it, which was based on evidence & not the involvement of Correia.
Leonor's injuries must have occurred at the police station, not the prison, because the prison called the station in the middle of the night to notify them of Leonor's worsening condition warranting a trip to hospital. If the injuries had occurred at the prison the hospital trip wold have been dealt with in-house.

[stephen25000]

Are you calling me a liar?  I have made mistakes as everyone on here has, but I have always tried to correct them.

Show me where I have lied.



If I say I met Marcos Aragao Correia and spent some time with him, having dinner with him twice, then I did.   Full stop.

I have seen him in his Lawyers role.   I can assure you that he would demolish you in a matter of minutes and spit the pieces out.  And i am not being rude, that is a fact. 


No hearsay about that.   I witnessed it.

No Sadie, I would wipe the floor with Correia.

He is a fantasist, and self proclaimed psychic.

As to your claims Sadie, you have NEVER verified them