Método 3, Marcos Aragão Correia and the campaign to discredit Gonçalo Amaral.

[Mr Gray]

Well, what can you say. &%+((£

Additionally, as revealed yesterday Slarti, it has become apparent, we can nothing for granted when some Mccann supporters give their word.

you failed miserably to provide the cite you said you could. You claimed correia admitted to offering a deal when it has been shown the deal did not exist

Do not accuse me of breaking my word
That is a serious insult

[slartibartfast]

#you have now posted two off topic posts in an attempt to divert the thread

That is very much on topic, this a thread on the lengths Correia went to damage the PJ.

[Benice]

Well, what can you say. &%+((£

Additionally, as revealed yesterday Slarti, it has become apparent, we can nothing for granted when some Mccann supporters give their word.

From reply 101 to 105


From the court reports/transcripts.


' Dealing with suspicions that in agreeing to defend Leonor Cipriano, he was being paid by someone who is very interested in ensuring that Gonçalo Amaral is convicted of a crime, or at least that his reputation is damaged - because of his public comments about Madeleine probably having died in Apartment 5A in Praia da Luz – he retorted to the court: “I don't get paid in pounds or in euros. I am here for principles, and my objective is to set free Leonor Cipriano”.

During the court session held on Monday 3 November, it emerged that Marcos Aragão Correia had made efforts to do a deal with the four detectives under Amaral’s command. The lawyer defending the four detectives said he had received an approach from Aragão Correia, proposing a very dirty deal.

Aragão Correia, he said, had asked him to consider a deal whereby, in exchange for the four detectives all agreeing to testify against Goncalo Amaral, and state that it was Amaral who gave the order to torture Leonor Cipriano, he would ensure that the charges against the four detectives were re-drawn so that their sentences would be greatly reduced. Hey would not get a custodial sentence, he promised. '

Stephen you have posted an accusation made against Correia by another lawyer and then claimed that the accusation is an admission by Correia himself.

Surely you can see that it isn't?

[stephen25000]

Stephen you have posted an accusation made against Correia by another lawyer and then claimed that the accusation is an admission by Correia.

Surely you can see that it isn't?

Have you read the transcripts from the court ?

If not do so.

You need a dose of reality.

Correia, as has been seen is a FANTASIST. His record of  stories and make believe, is available for all to read.

He has now disappeared into obscurity, which is hardly surprising.

[Mr Gray]

Have you read the transcripts from the court ?

If not do so.

You need a dose of reality.

You haven't posted any court transcripts
You are really confused
You think your post is a court transcript
It isnt
Can you tell us who wrote it

[ferryman]

Do you agree the myth that Kate was offered a deal has been debunked?

What?

Kate and Gerry were offered a deal.

What erroneous line of non-'reasoning' pretends otherwise?

[stephen25000]

What?

Kate and Gerry were offered a deal.

What erroneous line of non-'reasoning' pretends otherwise?

The Mccann's and members of their family.

Remember Aunty Phil.

[Benice]

Have you read the transcripts from the court ?

If not do so.

You need a dose of reality.

No need to be rude.

You didn't answer my question - so I will have to take it that you regard an accusation made by one person against another person is the same as the other person admitting the said accusation is true. 

If I accuse Joe Blogs of being an idiot -  does that prove that Joe Blogs has admitted to being an idiot?

Of course it doesn't.    That would be silly.

[ferryman]

The Mccann's and members of their family.

Remember Aunty Phil.

Philomena McCann's slight slip in describing the deal as a plea-bagain.

What of it?

Never forget that the article in The Guardian by Giles Tremlett was written before the files were released.

Tremlett seized on a slight terminological inaccuracy by Philomena McCann and lept to an erroneous assumption.

It is established (even if some people still choose to pretend otherwise) that Amaral headed up a murder enquiry, the culmination of which was that the McCanns were declared arguidos.

[stephen25000]

Philomena McCann's slight slip in describing the deal as a plea-bagain.

What of it?

Never forget that the article in The Guardian by Giles Tremlett was written before the files were released.

Tremlett seized on a slight terminological inaccuracy by Philomena McCann and lept to an erroneous assumption.

It is established (even if some people still choose to pretend otherwise) that Amaral headed up a murder enquiry, the culmination of which was that the McCanns were declared arguidos.

It was a direct quote from here.

[jassi]

The Mccann's and members of their family.

Remember Aunty Phil.

Only too well.  Whatever happened to her?

[ferryman]

It was a direct quote from here.

Explained in the full context Tremlett didn't have when he wrote his article for the Guardian.

In considering the two scenarios that Madeleine McCann has been murdered and her body disposed of by a person on foot or in a vehicle, I have reflected on the areas within zone 1 that have been previously searched or subject to forensic examination.

(Mark Harrison)

[stephen25000]

No need to be rude.

You didn't answer my question - so I will have to take it that you regard an accusation made by one person against another person is the same as the other person admitting the said accusation is true. 

If I accuse Joe Blogs of being an idiot -  does that prove that Joe Blogs has admitted to being an idiot?

Of course it doesn't.    That would be silly.

Correia is a proven liar.

As it stands now, I will not take for granted anything a Mccann supporter states in support of the McCann's as an undisputed fact.

Have you read through the court transcripts ?

You didn't answer that question.

[stephen25000]

Only too well.  Whatever happened to her?

She went quiet.

It was very overdue.

I found her quite obnoxious.

[ferryman]

Correia is a proven liar.

As it stands now, I will not take for granted anything a Mccann supporter states in support of the McCann's as an undisputed fact.

Have you read through the court transcripts ?

You didn't answer that question.

Amaral certainly is.

The Portuguese courts gave him a criminal conviction for lying.

And he has written a book about an enquiry he headed up filled with lies.