If Maddie
really was abducted, and the Smith's sighting
wasn't Gerry, then Kate had absolutely no reason to lie/mislead about the details of the 2 sightings....
But she
did, it's here for all to see......
Madeleine Was Here (7th May 2009)
Voice over: 'The most likely sighting of Madeleine was by Jane Tanner, a friend of the McCanns.'
'In the files Kate believes another witness statement from an Irish family describes a very similar sighting to Jane's.'
KM: 'There's actually quite a lot of similarities & it does beg the question, I mean how many people carry their children on a cold night not covered, y'know,
nothing on their arms or their feet. no blanket.
'Now either there's been
2 people carrying children in that way, who haven't come forward to eliminate themselves or potentially they are related.'
Interviewer: But you think that child is Madeleine?
KM: I think there's a good chance it could be Madeleine, certainly the description there sounds to me like Madeleine.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=fRQQWmpiO3s#t=265McCanns on Oprah (4th May 2009)
Gerry : "Jane went to check on her children and it was at that point she was just passed us going up to the corner and she saw a man carrying a young girl with
almo.. she described independently the pyjamas that Madeleine had on.."
Kate: "The child was barefoot and
bare armed..."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=xNI5up44Nho#t=820*Jane Tanner
didn't see the child's arms...
The McCann's reconstruction has Smithman carrying the child in a manner which was
not as described in the Smith family witness statements.
Instead, it depicts him carrying the child in the manner of
Bundleman, as was described by Jane Tanner, in her sighting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=na4aBr5PTYY#t=348Crimewatch Reconstruction (October 2013)
Smithman's child
is shown wearing
long sleeves, as
was described in Aiofe's witness statement.
The manner of carrying
is as described in the Smith's witness statements.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=OZ8jmdWlB8Y#t=1406There is no
innocent reason for Kate, & the McCanns own reconstruction, to have done that.