So statistically speaking what are the chances of dying in a terrorist attack in The UK vs dying in an a RTA? How many people have died in London as the result of terrorist attacks since say 1974 and how many people died in the Moorgate tube crash of that year and the Kings Cross fire of 1987?. Has the incidence of terrorist attacks per decade increased or decreased since 1970s. How many attacks have there been by Islamic Extremists vs say The Real IRA. How many attacks have there been on Mosques in the present decade?
Don't be so bloody silly, Alfred, of course we want the security services to be on the ball but you are all at sixes and sevens in a world of perception over reality, punting your own shallow agenda about which really amounts to little more than anyone who is remotely critical of the McCanns is typified as socially inferior or lacking in mores and anything else you might care to insinuate. I can recommend a good book: "The War of The Running Dogs" by Noel Barber.
This sentence of yours makes little sense: "Don't be so bloody silly, Alfred, of course we want the security services to be on the ball but you are all at sixes and sevens in a world of perception over reality, punting your own shallow agenda about which really amounts to little more than anyone who is remotely critical of the McCanns is typified as socially inferior or lacking in mores and anything else you might care to insinuate".
Could you please quote specifically what I have written on this thread that you consider to be "so bloody silly" and then I will know specifically what it is you have an objection to.
When you talk about the statistics of dying in a terrorist attack now versus then, would you care to consider just why there are so few successful attacks in this country? Could it have anything whatsoever to do with successful measures taken by security forces to prevent more attacks, or not at all in your view? Incidentally, fewer people now die in Road Traffic accidents than then did years ago because of government imposed sanctions on our civil liberties - do you object to these in principal?
As an aside, if we were talking about measures put in place by government to protect children against abuse or neglect at the expense of our civil liberties, then I've no doubt it would be a whole different argument wouldn't it?