« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 25 26 [27] 28 29 ... 39   Go Down

Author Topic: The Smith sighting revisited.  (Read 142285 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Brietta

Re: The Smith sighting revisited.
« Reply #390 on: October 21, 2014, 10:26:55 AM »
Quote from: misty48 on October 20, 2014, 11:12:40 PM
The Irish do like to talk!
You're not taking into consideration that some of them probably needed to visit the restroom before adjourning to the pub.

If there was a pregnant lady in their company … they most definitely had to visit the restroom on more than one occasion.  A place women almost never visit on their own. 

As for talking … they were a large family group including young children … imo they were strolling rather than walking smartly from A to B … and having conversation on the way … and their three year old wasn’t being carried, she was walking at her pace. 

After the time recorded on the receipt I do not think there is any way whatsoever to determine the exact time the Smith’s encountered the man and child … I think it may be a lot, lot later than estimated.
Logged
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Angelo222

Re: The Smith sighting revisited.
« Reply #391 on: October 21, 2014, 12:19:19 PM »
Quote from: stephen25000 on October 21, 2014, 09:55:19 AM

Would Madeleine have 'disappeared' if one or more other parents had been there, a babysitter had been present, etc.   ?

Without doubt an emphatic 'no' but I believe most right thinking people already know this. Had they dined in the garden beside the patio they might have got away with it but dining inside a tent over 60 metres away in a public place was just asking for trouble.

What possessed the McCanns to leave those babies alone, were they lured into a false sense of security by the others?  Did the Payne's having a baby monitor not alert them to potential dangers?

Logged
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: The Smith sighting revisited.
« Reply #392 on: October 21, 2014, 12:49:09 PM »
Quote from: Angelo222 on October 21, 2014, 12:19:19 PM
Without doubt an emphatic 'no' but I believe most right thinking people already know this. Had they dined in the garden beside the patio they might have got away with it but dining inside a tent over 60 metres away in a public place was just asking for trouble.

What possessed the McCanns to leave those babies alone, were they lured into a false sense of security by the others?  Did the Payne's having a baby monitor not alert them to potential dangers?

Largely I would  say Angelo, this comes down to the mccanns arrogance, in thinking they know better than anyone else.

Now if the rest of the group took sensible precautions, why the hell didn't they.

It was common sense after all.

Logged

Offline colombosstogey

Re: The Smith sighting revisited.
« Reply #393 on: October 21, 2014, 02:01:03 PM »
Well I could have moved that child EASY without anyone noticing.....and without bumping into smithman lol.
« Last Edit: October 21, 2014, 06:37:15 PM by John »
Logged

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The Smith sighting revisited.
« Reply #394 on: October 21, 2014, 02:09:08 PM »
Quote from: colombosstogey on October 21, 2014, 02:01:03 PM
Well I could have moved that child EASY without anyone noticing.....and without bumping into smithman lol.

It's that easy that you can't explain it.

There's only one theory that accounts for everything, pathfinder's.
« Last Edit: October 21, 2014, 06:37:35 PM by John »
Logged
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Brietta

Re: The Smith sighting revisited.
« Reply #395 on: October 21, 2014, 03:12:26 PM »
What a pity it took the Smiths a couple of weeks to realise their sighting might have had some relevance to the disappearance of a little girl from a property just a short distance away. 

Perhaps the police could have factored that into the investigation or eliminated it at an earlier stage if they had known about it at the time.
« Last Edit: October 24, 2014, 03:09:14 AM by John »
Logged
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline pathfinder73

Re: The Smith sighting revisited.
« Reply #396 on: October 21, 2014, 05:22:56 PM »
Quote from: colombosstogey on October 21, 2014, 02:01:03 PM
Oh its a contest is it.

Well I could have moved that child EASY without anyone noticing.....and without bumping into smithman lol.

There's definitely an element of risk involved but the alternative was unthinkable. Stuck between a rock and a hard place  ?>)()<
Logged
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline jassi

Re: The Smith sighting revisited.
« Reply #397 on: October 21, 2014, 05:26:48 PM »
Yes, Smithman played a risky game but had the luck of the devil and got away - and has continued to get away.
Logged
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline pathfinder73

Re: The Smith sighting revisited.
« Reply #398 on: October 21, 2014, 05:48:29 PM »
Quote from: jassi on October 21, 2014, 05:26:48 PM
Yes, Smithman played a risky game but had the luck of the devil and got away - and has continued to get away.

Agreed who dares wins. Unless that crucial evidence is found he will always wear a lucky face  8((()*/
Logged
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline jassi

Re: The Smith sighting revisited.
« Reply #399 on: October 21, 2014, 05:57:53 PM »
The issue is , will this crucial evidence, if it appears, be accepted and acted upon?
Logged
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline pegasus

Re: The Smith sighting revisited.
« Reply #400 on: October 22, 2014, 03:00:57 AM »
Quote from: misty48 on October 21, 2014, 02:13:44 AM
The 3 nannies all state that they became aware of the disappearance between 10 & 10.15.
The waiter Ricardo Oliveira states that the diners were all missing, bar Dianne, from the dining table, between 2145 & 2200hrs
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/RICARDO-A-D-L-OLIVEIRA.htm

I'm having a little trouble finding out who Joe is, as mentioned in Ricardo's statement, who seemed to be under the impression that Ricardo had phoned reception about the disappearance.
Is it really possible that absolutely none of the OC staff took responsibility for ensuring the police were called? Maybe the receptionist was just too busy booking in new arrivals.........but then, he wasn't asked what he was doing or who else was hanging around reception that night.
Joe = jeronimo
Logged

Offline pathfinder73

Re: The Smith sighting revisited.
« Reply #401 on: October 22, 2014, 08:28:27 AM »
Logged
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Brietta

Re: The Smith sighting revisited.
« Reply #402 on: October 22, 2014, 02:31:07 PM »
Why did the Smith's wait nearly a fortnight before deciding to contact the police to report seeing a man carrying a child near to where the abduction of a child had been reported?
« Last Edit: October 24, 2014, 03:15:50 AM by John »
Logged
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline pegasus

Re: The Smith sighting revisited.
« Reply #403 on: October 22, 2014, 11:45:14 PM »
Witness A.S. saw long sleeves.
The missing child was wearing short sleeves.
Therefore the child A.S. saw was not the missing child.
INRS.
Logged

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The Smith sighting revisited.
« Reply #404 on: October 23, 2014, 12:28:21 PM »
Quote from: pegasus on October 22, 2014, 11:45:14 PM
Witness A.S. saw long sleeves.
The missing child was wearing short sleeves.
Therefore the child A.S. saw was not the missing child.
INRS.

Or, the McCanns lied about what she was wearing.



« Last Edit: October 23, 2014, 02:35:10 PM by Admin »
Logged
Christian Brueckner Fan Club
Pages: 1 ... 25 26 [27] 28 29 ... 39   Go Up
« previous next »