Author Topic: The Smith sighting revisited.  (Read 148827 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: The Smith sighting revisited.
« Reply #465 on: October 24, 2014, 12:50:06 AM »
Is there a word missing there?  ........  family?

I bet his nose was a lot longer at the end of that interview than at the beginning.  Not a single mention of the fact that apart from his wife none of the rest of the Smith family agreed with their father, and even he wasn't certain.

Can't you read?

"The Smith family [Irish witnesses] is available to make a formal recognition. We had already contacted the Smith family, from Ireland, whose patriarch was prepared to travel to the Algarve, to give a new statement and for a formal recognition"
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Angelo222

Re: The Smith sighting revisited.
« Reply #466 on: October 24, 2014, 12:51:57 AM »
Always remembering that the Smiths have an apartment in Praia da Luz so returning for them was never going to be a problem.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline pegasus

Re: The Smith sighting revisited.
« Reply #467 on: October 24, 2014, 12:56:39 AM »
Always remembering that the Smiths have an apartment in Praia da Luz so returning for them was never going to be a problem.
He 50% owned the apartment so would have to plan ahead when to use it to fit in around the other owner and possibly rental bookings too. Also better for PJ to have them near Portimao.

Offline Eleanor

Re: The Smith sighting revisited.
« Reply #468 on: October 24, 2014, 01:01:20 AM »
Can't you read?

"The Smith family [Irish witnesses] is available to make a formal recognition. We had already contacted the Smith family, from Ireland, whose patriarch was prepared to travel to the Algarve, to give a new statement and for a formal recognition"

Who said that?  How can 60 to 80% be formal recognition?  Every body carries a child like that.

Offline Benice

Re: The Smith sighting revisited.
« Reply #469 on: October 24, 2014, 01:03:05 AM »
Can't you read?

"The Smith family [Irish witnesses] is available to make a formal recognition. We had already contacted the Smith family, from Ireland, whose patriarch was prepared to travel to the Algarve, to give a new statement and for a formal recognition"

The implication being that all the Smith family thought it was Gerry- even though Martin Smith said that apart from his wife none of the rest of the family agreed with him and he wasn't 100% sure himself.      But then IIRC this is the man who said in an interview that Jane Tanner was present at the 'confrontation' meeting with Murat.   That wasn't true either.


The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline pegasus

Re: The Smith sighting revisited.
« Reply #470 on: October 24, 2014, 01:08:37 AM »
... Amaral interview ...
GA: When I left Portimão, on the 1st of October, I left on the 2nd but on the 1st we were arranging for those witnesses to come to Portugal. We already had permission from the national director, all that was left to do was to choose a hotel for them to stay and to schedule a date. After I left I know it took several months until the witness was heard, which happened around January or February this year, I don't know, through a rogatory letter or a request for assistance under international cooperation.
So
Monday 1st October: Mr Amaral is completing the arrangements for the Irish witnesses to fly to portugal again.
Tuesday 2nd October morning: Mr Amaral is removed from the case.

Offline pegasus

Re: The Smith sighting revisited.
« Reply #471 on: October 24, 2014, 01:19:59 AM »
We know from one of the younger members of the group of witnesses, that the man was wearing a long-sleeved black jacket or coat.

If this man was carrying a child illicitly (which is what most abduction theories AND most occultation theories are united in claiming), why did he not undo or take off his black jacket/coat and partly conceal the child with it?

Offline Eleanor

Re: The Smith sighting revisited.
« Reply #472 on: October 24, 2014, 01:24:24 AM »
We know from one of the younger members of the group of witnesses, that the man was wearing a long-sleeved black jacket or coat.

If this man was carrying a child illicitly (which is what most abduction theories AND most occultation theories are united in claiming), why did he not undo or take off his black jacket/coat and partly conceal the child with it?

Perleaze, don't distract me any further.  I don't think anyone has said anything about a jacket.

Okay, suppose they did.  Was Gerry wearing a jacket?

Offline Brietta

Re: The Smith sighting revisited.
« Reply #473 on: October 24, 2014, 01:26:01 AM »
How credible are the efits if they were produced by the Smiths?

Dr Amaral’s investigation didn’t require them in May 2007. 

Probably because Martin, Peter and Aoife Smith all said they would be unable to identify the man whose face they had not seen when he passed them in the darkness.

Yet over one year later they were able to produce almost photographic images of the man whose face they had not seen.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline misty

Re: The Smith sighting revisited.
« Reply #474 on: October 24, 2014, 01:27:16 AM »
Does anyone know if there was another night-creche between 5a & where Smithman was  seen?

Offline Benice

Re: The Smith sighting revisited.
« Reply #475 on: October 24, 2014, 01:31:52 AM »
Perleaze, don't distract me any further.  I don't think anyone has said anything about a jacket.

Okay, suppose they did. Was Gerry wearing a jacket?

No - according to the files he was wearing a light brown 'polar' top. 

(I presume that is a translation error or typo and should be 'polo') 
The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline pathfinder73

Re: The Smith sighting revisited.
« Reply #476 on: October 24, 2014, 01:42:59 AM »
How credible are the efits if they were produced by the Smiths?

Dr Amaral’s investigation didn’t require them in May 2007. 

Probably because Martin, Peter and Aoife Smith all said they would be unable to identify the man whose face they had not seen when he passed them in the darkness.

Yet over one year later they were able to produce almost photographic images of the man whose face they had not seen.

Martin Smith said SY have talked to the family on two separate occasions in an 18 month period before reopening the case with the Portuguese. And he was prime suspect on the CW special and Tannerman buried. Go figure.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: The Smith sighting revisited.
« Reply #477 on: October 24, 2014, 01:46:26 AM »
No - according to the files he was wearing a light brown 'polar' top. 

(I presume that is a translation error or typo and should be 'polo')

— Adds further that his son TA*** was questioned in Ireland and said that the individual was dressed in a long-sleeved coat/jacket, black in colour, and that the child was barefoot. (Peter Smith)

What's this black item on the sofa?



« Last Edit: October 24, 2014, 01:53:28 AM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Brietta

Re: The Smith sighting revisited.
« Reply #478 on: October 24, 2014, 01:47:07 AM »
Martin Smith said SY have talked to the family on two separate occasions in an 18 month period before reopening the case with the Portuguese. And he was prime suspect on the CW special and Tannerman buried. Go figure.

Did he happen to say why he could not describe the man's features a fortnight after seeing him ... but apparently had perfect recall more than a month later?

Why did Dr Amaral's investigation fail to get such excellent images? 
« Last Edit: October 24, 2014, 01:52:42 AM by Brietta »
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline pathfinder73

Re: The Smith sighting revisited.
« Reply #479 on: October 24, 2014, 01:49:31 AM »
Did he happen to say why he could not describe the man's features a fortnight after seeing him ... but apparently had perfect recall more than a mont later?

Why did Dr Amaral's investigation fail to get such excellent images?

Ask SY.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.