Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.

[ferryman]

Presumably the police having read the "dossier" will, if there is sufficient evidence, prosecute someone for the act of  "encouraging or assisting a crime" ?
Has anyone heard of such a case being brought resultant from the police receiving the "dossier"?

Presumably not.

No one intended, foresaw or could reasonably predict that confronting Brenda Leyland over her on-line activities might result in an outcome as tragic as her loss of life.

[Carana]

Brenda Leyland deserved to be outed by Brunt..IMO...she chose to spend all day tweeting abuse towards the mccanns...she brought it on herself

Brunt didn't though. He never mentioned her name, nor the name of the village where she lived.

It was the Daily Mail, I believe, that first named her.

From what I've been able to gather, at some point she posted quite happily in her own name, and only later chose to take her name off. Was she being egged on by her "friends" on that tag?

It does seem as if she was looking forward to interaction with Brunt... yet when he obliged by offering her a live opportunity to justify her views, she didn't seem too happy about that.

Some of her comments show a dismal lack of understanding about the case. Who was feeding her this misinformation?

[Alice Purjorick]

Presumably not.

No one intended, foresaw or could reasonably predict that confronting Brenda Leyland over her on-line activities might result in an outcome as tragic as her loss of life.

My post was not related to Mrs Leyland.
It was in reply to Carana's "what if some nutter decides to take action" or whatever [against the McCanns].

[Carew]

Presumably not.

No one intended, foresaw or could reasonably predict that confronting Brenda Leyland over her on-line activities might result in an outcome as tragic as her loss of life.

It was intended, foreseen and predicted that Mrs Leyland would be the selected target to confront over her on-line activities, though..........

.......not the alleged waterboarders or kidnappers of twins........" some nut-case " who might actually decide to act it out according to Carana`s  post.

[stephen25000]

Presumably not.

No one intended, foresaw or could reasonably predict that confronting Brenda Leyland over her on-line activities might result in an outcome as tragic as her loss of life.

So no one could have predicted that a woman living by herself and plastered over the news media of the country, with her face and address easily identifiable would not be vulnerable ?


I don't think so. &%&£(+ &%&£(+ &%&£(+


....and meanwhile what has happened to Brunt ?

Likewise what has happened to the compilers of the dossier and those who colluded with them, and you know who I mean by that.  %£&)**# %£&)**# %£&)**#

I hope Brenda Leyland's son's will take the appropriate action, as some have it coming.

IMO of course.

[Mr Gray]

So no one could have predicted that a woman living by herself and plastered over the news media of the country, with her face and address easily identifiable would not be vulnerable ?


I don't think so. &%&£(+ &%&£(+ &%&£(+

She chose to become involved in abusive tweets against the McCanns..her choice

[ferryman]

It was intended, foreseen and predicted that Mrs Leyland would be the selected target to confront over her on-line activities, though..........

.......not the alleged waterboarders or kidnappers of twins........" some nut-case " who might actually decide to act it out according to Carana`s  post.

Which was perfectly legal ...

[stephen25000]

She chose to become involved in abusive tweets against the McCanns..her choice

and the mccanns chose to expose their children to unnecessary danger.

I know exactly where the buck stops in this case. %£&)**# %£&)**# %£&)**#

[ferryman]

What does copious use of smilies add to debate?

[stephen25000]

What does copious use of smilies add to debate?

It's draws notice to the salient points, does it not.

[Carew]

Which was perfectly legal ...

Is that comment intended to justify the choice of Ms Leyland as the target instead of alleged waterboard threateners and kidnappers?

[ferryman]

Is that comment intended to justify the choice of Ms Leyland as the target instead of alleged waterboard threateners and kidnappers?

I have not made any comparison whatever with waterboarding.

That was your interjection, not mine.

[stephen25000]

Is that comment intended to justify the choice of Ms Leyland as the target instead of alleged waterboard threateners and kidnappers?

I would say she was selected as an easy target.

IMO of course.

[Mr Gray]

Is that comment intended to justify the choice of Ms Leyland as the target instead of alleged waterboard threateners and kidnappers?

Brenda made herself a legitimate target..perhaps the others could not be identified

[stephen25000]

Brenda made herself a legitimate target..perhaps the others could not be identified

So a legitimate target of revenge davel ?

Choose your words carefully., since you are condoning vigil[ censored word]m, which is undeniably breaking the law.