Author Topic: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.  (Read 417397 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Benice

Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #180 on: November 01, 2014, 07:56:03 AM »
Yes we know.

She was identified by trolls supporting the mccanns.

Not police officers of course, just trolls.

IMO of course.

Trolls?

How could anyone know that the people who compiled the dossier ever posted anywhere themselves?  They may have confined themselves to simply collating the evidence of lawbreaking.

The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #181 on: November 01, 2014, 08:20:58 AM »
Trolls?

How could anyone know that the people who compiled the dossier ever posted anywhere themselves?  They may have confined themselves to simply collating the evidence of lawbreaking.

They are known, and they do post.

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #182 on: November 01, 2014, 08:38:35 AM »
Yes we know.

She was identified by trolls supporting the mccanns.

Not police officers of course, just trolls.

IMO of course.

can i point out that if th  mcanns had bene proper parents the night of may 3rd  brenda would stilll be  alive and maddie would not have bene vanished  for  7  years? their actions have caused  all  this

Offline Benice

Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #183 on: November 01, 2014, 10:36:11 AM »


Just like benice  you can't  be bothered to read through my posts  to find the links already given, as you failed to do yourself  last night.

and let's not forget not long ago you accused me of providing false links to BBC as regards BHH.

So could you kindly repost the link giving the identity/names of the people who compiled the dossier please? 
   

« Last Edit: November 01, 2014, 10:45:23 AM by Eleanor »
The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #184 on: November 01, 2014, 10:41:05 AM »
No carly.

Not 'more than likely'

They definitely did.

Froth and bubble with more than a dash of hypocrisy ...

Offline faithlilly

Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #185 on: November 01, 2014, 10:50:38 AM »
Froth and bubble with more than a dash of hypocrisy ...

So ferryman I will ask you the same questions I asked Davel  ( who deemed it expedient not to answer ).


If Brenda had broken the law then it was up to the police to investigate and charge her ?

What if no charges had been brought, as seemed likely ? Would you still believe that what Sky did was justified ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #186 on: November 01, 2014, 10:55:29 AM »
So ferryman I will ask you the same questions I asked Davel  ( who deemed it expedient not to answer ).


If Brenda had broken the law then it was up to the police to investigate and charge her ?

What if no charges had been brought, as seemed likely ? Would you still believe that what Sky did was justified ?

It's the wrong question.

The question is whether there was any ethical objection to challenging her.

There is none.

The only possible questionmark is whether any publicity might have prejudiced any trial. 

Otherwise no problem.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #187 on: November 01, 2014, 10:59:48 AM »
I do not know if you have followed what I have been saying ... I do not think we are talking at cross purposes here.

Yeah sorry to be a pain! I thought we were on the same track but was not quite sure!
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #188 on: November 01, 2014, 11:04:34 AM »
Anyone who commits suicide is likely to have  a history of depression....perhaps this is something the coroner will look at.

You clearly did not read my post properly or if you did you failed to understand it
« Last Edit: November 01, 2014, 11:10:49 AM by Eleanor »
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #189 on: November 01, 2014, 11:14:01 AM »
So ferryman I will ask you the same questions I asked Davel  ( who deemed it expedient not to answer ).


If Brenda had broken the law then it was up to the police to investigate and charge her ?

What if no charges had been brought, as seemed likely ? Would you still believe that what Sky did was justified ?

I answered this morning at 7.20.....I think you owe me an apology

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #190 on: November 01, 2014, 11:17:00 AM »
You clearly did not read my post properly or if you did you failed to understand it

wrong on both assumptions

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #191 on: November 01, 2014, 11:28:36 AM »
So could you kindly repost the link giving the identity/names of the people who compiled the dossier please? 
 

Look it up for yourself on here, or on amazon.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #192 on: November 01, 2014, 11:29:33 AM »
It's the wrong question.

The question is whether there was any ethical objection to challenging her.

There is none.

The only possible questionmark is whether any publicity might have prejudiced any trial. 

Otherwise no problem.

No the questions are as I posed them.

Care to answer ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #193 on: November 01, 2014, 11:46:26 AM »
No the questions are as I posed them.

Care to answer ?

What if no charges had been brought, as seemed likely ? Would you still believe that what Sky did was justified ?

Through-and-through justified.

My only (slight) concern was if charges had been brought prior publicity might have breached the sub judice laws.

Offline Carew

Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #194 on: November 01, 2014, 11:54:45 AM »
"Trial by media," then?

Is that what is meant by "ethical" and "legal" and "justified?"

If the police won`t shape up ...........get the press in to sort it!
« Last Edit: November 01, 2014, 11:58:16 AM by Carew »