Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.

[Lyall]

I suggest that before you make such assumptions about the tweeter in question you take a look at their tweets - a large part of them are tweeted directly to "sceptics" .  I cannot find any tweets from this tweeter threating BL, nor any tweets made by BL complaining about threats from this tweeter.  Can you?

Where are you looking?

A huge number of tweets were deleted in October by many people, along with some accounts.

[Alfred R Jones]

Where are you looking?

A huge number of tweets by many people were deleted in October, along with some accounts.

Greptweet.

[Lyall]

Greptweet.

Deleted ones don't appear there?

[DCI]

Where are you looking?

A huge number of tweets were deleted in October by many people, along with some accounts.

Why do you think that was Lyall?

[faithlilly]

I suggest that before you make such assumptions about the tweeter in question you take a look at their tweets - a large part of them are tweeted directly to "sceptics" .  I cannot find any tweets from this tweeter threating BL, nor any tweets made by BL complaining about threats from this tweeter.  Can you?

I made no assumptions about the tweeter in question i merely suggested that we may not be able to see the whole picture. You still haven't answered me why the tweeter quoted was facing the sack ? What could a sceptic possibly do that would force her employer to sack her ?

[Mr Gray]

I think the most relevant witness will be Brendas psychiatrist.......all will be revealed

[Lyall]

Why do you think that was Lyall?

Panic in some cases probably and perhaps guilt in others? Or both? People on both 'sides' deleted.

[Alfred R Jones]

I made no assumptions about the tweeter in question i merely suggested that we may not be able to see the whole picture. You still haven't answered me why the tweeter quoted was facing the sack ? What could a sceptic possibly do that would force her employer to sack her ?

For some reason people like BL thought that if a witness in the case like Amy Tierney was tweeting about the case then this would be illegal and therefore a sackable offence.  That seems to be the gist of it. 

[DCI]

I made no assumptions about the tweeter in question i merely suggested that we may not be able to see the whole picture. You still haven't answered me why the tweeter quoted was facing the sack ? What could a sceptic possibly do that would force her employer to sack her ?

Give it a good try by these tweets!

516509832254619648|Mon Sep 29 08:48:34 +0000 2014|@1matthewwright1  #mccann  Amazing how they whimper and call " foul play " why shd Amy receive indemnity after she has caused harm

516507442218549248|Mon Sep 29 08:39:05 +0000 2014|#mccann  For benefit of thick Shills, danger is not voicing opinion, it is contacting work and family to  create havoc

516506964487335936|Mon Sep 29 08:37:11 +0000 2014|#mccann  I would not agree with naming unless the perp was actually a danger, Amy has proved to B so

[faithlilly]

Give it a good try by these tweets!

516509832254619648|Mon Sep 29 08:48:34 +0000 2014|@1matthewwright1  #mccann  Amazing how they whimper and call " foul play " why shd Amy receive indemnity after she has caused harm

516507442218549248|Mon Sep 29 08:39:05 +0000 2014|#mccann  For benefit of thick Shills, danger is not voicing opinion, it is contacting work and family to  create havoc

516506964487335936|Mon Sep 29 08:37:11 +0000 2014|#mccann  I would not agree with naming unless the perp was actually a danger, Amy has proved to B so

So are you saying that no one actually contacted her employer, which would have been rather pointless anyway if she wasn't Amy Tierney, nor actually threatened to do so ?

[Eleanor]

Could we not accept that Brenda wasn't as tough as she wanted to appear to be, although she does seem to have given that impression.
I don't know why she did this.  I don't know why she tweeted such horrible things, or why she then appears to have committed suicide.  I only know that it is really very sad.

This Thread would not even be here if it was anything to do with me.  But needs must if the devil drives.

[Alfred R Jones]

This thread has a long way to go yet.  It will be double in length by the end of next month.

[Lyall]

Could we not accept that Brenda wasn't as tough as she wanted to appear to be, although she does seem to have given that impression.
I don't know why she did this.  I don't know why she tweeted such horrible things, or why she then appears to have committed suicide.  I only know that it is really very sad.

This Thread would not even be here if it was anything to do with me.  But needs must if the devil drives.

Interesting. Why wouldn't it be here?

[Eleanor]

This thread has a long way to go yet.  It will be double in length by the end of next month.

Of course it will.  But we are all saying things that are better left unsaid.

[Eleanor]

Interesting. Why wouldn't it be here?

Because I don't like the slagging off of dead people.   Some ancient thought within my soul.  But then neither do I like some idiot telling me that what she did was really okay, because it wasn't.

Best not talked about at all.  But do carry on.  I have no say in the matter.