The chief constable of Leicestershire police testified that he knew the forensic results leaked to the Portuguese press … were wrong. If you agree with his stance on not immediately rectifying this … that is a matter for you.
I was appalled that they knew and didn't say anything.
There was, however, a statement (perhaps even two?) issued regarding inaccurate reporting or along those lines, but it was so vague that the press couldn't second-guess what it was referring to. I'm not sure I could find the link again... or it may be buried somewhere in the Leveson files.
My understanding of what Baggot was trying to say was that the bigger picture, i.e., diplomacy, took precedence as cooperation with overseas police forces was paramount (whichever force that may be, then or at any time in the future).
At least one of the hacks stated that the media should have been informed off-the-record, but in view of the scale of the irresponsible media frenzy at the time, LP may well have come to the conclusion that no one could be trusted and any leak would have further fuelled the UK/PT media war and thus international police relations.
Unfortunately, the McCanns ended up as collateral damage so as to avoid rocking the boat.