Was Madeleine McCann run over by accident and then carried off?

[G-Unit]

It is if you hide their body afterwards!

Which is not what you said.

[ShiningInLuz]

Inadequate perhaps, but not illegal.  If she was run over or abducted however that would be illegal and I'm sure you'll be the first to condemn in the harshest terms those responsible.

If MBM was run over, it would raise one heck of a lot of questions as to whether what was described of the event scene at apartment 5A is true.

[Alfie]

Which is not what you said.

We are discussing Madeleine McCann are we not?  It goes without saying that if she was run over, something illegal took place thereafter.   

[G-Unit]

We are discussing Madeleine McCann are we not?  It goes without saying that if she was run over, something illegal took place thereafter.

Yes, if it was a hit and run and someone found her and thought they would be in trouble for some reason..........................

[Alfie]

Yes, if it was a hit and run and someone found her and thought they would be in trouble for some reason..........................

You can't help yourself can you?   That is not the only instance in which it would be illegal but you chose only the above scenario to describe.  I wonder why...

[sadie]

You can't help yourself can you?   That is not the only instance in which it would be illegal but you chose only the above scenario to describe.  I wonder why...

I wonder why too

There has to be a reason

[G-Unit]

I wonder why too

There has to be a reason

Is there any reason why not? My suggestion is as possible as any other.

[Alfie]

Is there any reason why not? My suggestion is as possible as any other.

If the child was knocked down by a car, the more likely explanation for the lack of a body would be that the driver removed it, but you don't seem so keen to consider that, in favour of "someone" coming across the body in the road and for some utterly inexplicable reason deciding to conceal it.  That's what is odd, your strange bias...

[carlymichelle]

could gerry have disturbed a  sleeping maddie when he went   back to the aapartment   for whatever  reason he did she  woke  up  and  went   after him and he didnt  see her??

[Robittybob1]

could gerry have disturbed a  sleeping maddie when he went   back to the aapartment   for whatever  reason he did she  woke  up  and  went   after him and he didnt  see her??

And how do you explain the open window and shutters?

[G-Unit]

If the child was knocked down by a car, the more likely explanation for the lack of a body would be that the driver removed it, but you don't seem so keen to consider that, in favour of "someone" coming across the body in the road and for some utterly inexplicable reason deciding to conceal it.  That's what is odd, your strange bias...

1. I've never heard of anyone taking the victim of a road accident with them.
2. Hit and run is pretty common.
3. What about the 'evidence of abduction' windows and shutters?
4. I gave the reason for 'someone' hiding the victim; fear of being blamed.
5. I have no bias, strange or otherwise, but I will continue to counter the stories of others invented to support their bias.

[Alfie]

1. I've never heard of anyone taking the victim of a road accident with them.
2. Hit and run is pretty common.
3. What about the 'evidence of abduction' windows and shutters?
4. I gave the reason for 'someone' hiding the victim; fear of being blamed.
5. I have no bias, strange or otherwise, but I will continue to counter the stories of others invented to support their bias.

1. your number 4 is a reason which counters your point one
2. I have certainly never heard of someone coming across a road accident victim and hiding the body!
3. What about it?  We were talking about whether or not knocking someone over in a car was illegal.
4. You certainly are biased because you chose a less obvious scenario to highlight rather than the more obvious one.

[G-Unit]

1. your number 4 is a reason which counters your point one
2. I have certainly never heard of someone coming across a road accident victim and hiding the body!
3. What about it?  We were talking about whether or not knocking someone over in a car was illegal.
4. You certainly are biased because you chose a less obvious scenario to highlight rather than the more obvious one.  Please don't insult my intelligence by pretending otherwise.  We all know what you're implying.

1. No it isn't because as far as I know it's never happened.
2. I've never heard of a driver taking a body either.
3. The debate had moved on to making off with the body [which you suggested] Who opened the shutters then and why is a valid question.
4. The bias lies with the one who suggests something very unusual for which there is no evidence. We all know why.

[Alfie]

1. No it isn't because as far as I know it's never happened.
2. I've never heard of a driver taking a body either.
3. The debate had moved on to making off with the body [which you suggested] Who opened the shutters then and why is a valid question.
4. The bias lies with the one who suggests something very unusual for which there is no evidence. We all know why.

30 seconds googling turns up this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Gregory_Glen_Biggs
Now over to you to find an example of someone coming across a road traffic accident victim and deciding to hide the body.  But of course you won't because you know when you're beat and have withdrawn from the argument. 
In any case both scenarios are extremely unusual, but one even more so than the other.  IMO it didn't happen to Madeleine this way.

[Robittybob1]

If your child has disappeared for reasons unknown why would you stage a break in?

But if a hit and run happened and the driver picked her up that would put a spoke in the works.Even if the only reason he picked her up was to get medical help.