Author Topic: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.  (Read 78995 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #285 on: December 08, 2014, 06:48:39 PM »
I'm not the least bit surprised you don't get it.

All you have given is hearsay, and nothing more.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #286 on: December 08, 2014, 06:49:37 PM »
Does Stephen believe that only the McCanns failed to check on their kids every night, or the whole Tapas group?

I didn't say the others didn't.

Do take notice.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #287 on: December 08, 2014, 06:49:41 PM »
Vixte has provided evidence of a petition not that the McCanns asked for the dogs to be brought in so she is indeed spreading misinformation. Though to be fair she is only repeating the dishonest claims of another.

Posting nonsense 3, 4,  5  times does not change the fact that it is still nonsense.
So, if I post a link to a Guardian article which cites unnamed sources then, according to you, I am posting "nonsense", correct?  So, in your view should no newspaper articles that only mention unnamed sources be allowed on this forum?  What about when you post Blacksmith gossip on the news thread?  That's OK is it?
« Last Edit: December 08, 2014, 06:52:05 PM by Alfred R Jones »

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #288 on: December 08, 2014, 06:50:36 PM »
Does Stephen believe that only the McCanns failed to check on their kids every night, or the whole Tapas group?

Stephen probably believes that the McCanns stage-managed "checks" on May 3rd as some sort of cover for other nefarious deeds that evening ...

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #289 on: December 08, 2014, 06:51:19 PM »
I didn't say the others didn't.

Do take notice.
OK, so only the McCanns failed to do checks in your view.  Why do you believe this to be the case?  Where is your evidence?  Why would they sit put whilst all around them their mates were busily checking on their kids?  Is that what you really think?

Offline faithlilly

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #290 on: December 08, 2014, 06:56:02 PM »
So, if I post a link to a Guardian article which cites unnamed sources then, according to you, I am posting "nonsense", correct?  So, in your view should no newspaper articles that only mention unnamed sources be allowed on this forum?  What about when you post Blacksmith gossip on the news thread?  That's OK is it?

But of course ! Especially as he's so devilishly handsome  ! 8**8:/:
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #291 on: December 08, 2014, 07:00:52 PM »
OK, so only the McCanns failed to do checks in your view.  Why do you believe this to be the case?  Where is your evidence?  Why would they sit put whilst all around them their mates were busily checking on their kids?  Is that what you really think?


You're quite worried.

All you need is to show the McCann's checked their children each night and I will keep stum on that.

PS. Did gm actually look at Madeleine on the night she 'disappeared' ?


Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #292 on: December 08, 2014, 07:09:54 PM »
But of course ! Especially as he's so devilishly handsome  ! 8**8:/:
Stop it, you're embarrassing yourself. 

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #293 on: December 08, 2014, 07:11:41 PM »

You're quite worried.

All you need is to show the McCann's checked their children each night and I will keep stum on that.

PS. Did gm actually look at Madeleine on the night she 'disappeared' ?
Hahahahaha, this is why it's pointless engaging with Stephen - he makes no attempt whatsoever to address your post and only makes pointless and inaccurate observations.  Back on ignore  8((()*/

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #294 on: December 08, 2014, 07:13:03 PM »
Hahahahaha, this is why it's pointless engaging with Stephen - he makes no attempt whatsoever to address your post and only makes pointless and inaccurate observations.  Back on ignore  8((()*/

Oh dear.

Back to mccweenie land then. *&*%£

Offline faithlilly

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #295 on: December 08, 2014, 08:44:57 PM »
Stop it, you're embarrassing yourself.

Oh come on Alfie who wouldn't over a studmuffin like Blacksmith !   *&*%£
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline pathfinder73

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #296 on: December 08, 2014, 08:50:02 PM »
Listen, eel - you accused Vixte of spreading misinformation on this forum about a petition that existed early on in the investigation to get UK dogs brought onto the case and about the McCanns urging for this to happen.  You have been supplied with a) a link to the actual petition and b) an article in the Guardian newspaper (a more reliable source than Blacksmith's blog if I may be so bold)  confirming the McCanns request for dogs to be brought in  and still you harp on.  I think you owe Vixte an apology, don't you? 

No, I didn't think so.   @)(++(*

They slagged off the dogs. They're not unreliable like them 8)--)) Kate also said she would take a lie detector and then refused. Wise decision.

Mr Cargill said: "Kate said she'd take it to prove her innocence but in reality, she wasn't willing. I was dumbfounded, to tell the truth."
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #297 on: December 08, 2014, 09:03:15 PM »
Oh come on Alfie who wouldn't over a studmuffin like Blacksmith !   *&*%£
You seem to have completely lost the plot, have a lie down.

Offline Eleanor

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #298 on: December 08, 2014, 09:20:30 PM »

What's a Stud Muffin?

Sorry, Off Topic.  But I just have to know.

Offline Anna

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #299 on: December 08, 2014, 10:03:52 PM »
What's a Stud Muffin?

Sorry, Off Topic.  But I just have to know.

Apparently it's...

Guy that gets the ladies easy, is always fishin' and....likes a muffin every now and then. (from urban dictionary)

or it could be one of these teatime goodies with an earring...I suppose
 @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(*

“You should not honour men more than truth.”
― Plato