Yeah we know they are the only realistic points of entrance given the abductor wasn't Zeus using his golden rain trick down the cooker extraction duct.
Did the abductor come through the jemmied shutters; the closed window; the open patio doors; the closed patio doors the locked front door?. If there were forced illegal entry why did the police not believe there was such entry?. Which would narrow it down to coming in through the front door using a key there being no sign of a forced entry.
So the abductor came in through front door using a key, snatched the child and legged it through the front door closing it behind him? That pretty much is your theory then Alf reading between your own lines.
So why did the Portuguese police not believe it and why do The Met say "we have identified a window of opportunity (droll) in which an abduction could have taken place".
Which is not quite your "SY agree with me and say it was an abduction" or whatever.
Piss poor riposte. Whatever the PJ believed in 2007 is of no interest to me now, in 2014. Their investigation was headed by someone who couldn't investigate his way out of a paper bag - IMHO. I'm far more interested in where the current investigation is leading, in who they have interviewed and want to interview and why. And if you want to labour under the belief that the Met is biding its time until its dawn raids on Rothley time then that is your choice, but I fear you are in for a long, long, long, long wait - I just hope you have the stamina for it, dear Alice.