Jeremy claimed he brought the bike over three days before the massacre for Julie.
Jeremy's supporters have said it is a coincidence that the bike arrived just before the massacre. The prosecution successfully argued he cycled to and from WHF.
Anyway. The fact is Jeremy brought June's bike back to his cottage in his car three days before the massacre. But what was Julie going to use the bike for ?
She did not live at Jeremy's cottage. Or work near there as far as I am aware.
When she visits Jeremy, she is going to see Jeremy. Not go cycling off on her own.
Were they going to go on romantic cycling journeys together. Well, no as there was only one bike.
Did Jeremy have a car ? Yes, so they could drive to places together. Or Jeremy could give her a lift. Unless Jeremy was going to drive somewhere and make Julie cycle. I know Jeremy said the relationship had been in decline for 6 months but... Leading on from this the judge asked why would a bike be brought over if the relationship had been in decline for six months ? The judge also said the bike had dried blood on. But did not elaborate where it came from.
Maybe the bike was really brought for Jeremy's own personal use ? Yeah right, he would not be seen dead on it.
Had Julie been pestering Jeremy for a bike ? If so he took his time getting one. By co incidence bringing a bike over just before the massacre. Julie saying he wanted to do a trial bike ride to WHF. Even then he didn't buy one. Rather just took June's.
Perhaps Julie could have brought her own bike over. If she had one. Or Jeremy could have bought her one. June bought a bike for a reason, probably for her own personal use. As people do.
The bike was forensically tested weeks later. Not sure what would be found. If Jeremy had cleaned up at WHF before getting on it. Or had no serious wounds. He also had weeks to wash it down.
Does anyone know what Julie was going to use the bike for ?