Just to clarify. I was implying that a reduced dose or a missed dose would have made her less sedated and more active as all of the evidence that claims Shelia was too incapable of using the gun is consistent will the side effects of the medication she was on.
There are 2 distinct issues in play with respect to the medication.
1) effectiveness: was the dosage too small to be medically effective and thus she had a relaose
2) the side effects:
a) one side effect of the medication is drowsiness and sedation. Both before and after the reduction to 100MG she complained to people about being overly tired and would go to bed early. The Saturday evening before the murders she went home early from a party because she was tired.
b) loss of dexterity and involuntary spasms.
The tired issue makes it unlikely she would wake up in the middle of the night. But if she did there would be nothing to agitate her because everyone else was in bed and her medication was working properly.
The issue of the involuntary spasms and loss of dexterity means she would have a problem loading the gun rapidly and a problem with aiming it accurately. It is hard to believe she could fire 25 shots without missing a single time given the dexterity problems, her poor hand eye coordination and the involuntary spasms.
This is extra though not the main case against Jeremy.
The main case against Jeremy was testimony that he told Julie he planned to kill his family, that he called her before police to tell her they were dead, evidence he lied to police and staged bullets to support his lies and finally evidence that the victims did not kill themselves or eachother and that a third party did it so proof that Jeremy carried out his planned attack.
His supporters play games and dance around but never competently address let alone refute this evidence. Most supporters are busy arguing other cases instead of the specifics of this case. They talk about documented MOJs and then say this proves there could be an MOJ here though the facts are completely different and other MOJs having nothing at all to do with this case. They do that because they have nothing substantive to seize upon in this case to establish there was an MOJ.
The claims of his defenders seemed pretty damning and I approached the case thinking maybe he was innocent. But upon scrutinizing the claims and looking in depth at the facts it became clear his defenders grossly misrepresented things from A-Z. Stories about Nevill calling police, Sheila being shot by police and then moved and many other claims all have turned out to be made up nonsense. When all the nonsense is stripped away it is clear Jeremy is guilty and his defenders simply choose to ignore reality for a variety of reasons ranging from hating police to loving conspiracies to having some odd like for Jeremy. If you approach it rationally and objectively there is no question of his guilt.
