Poll

Do you think the judge will...

Rule case dismissed.
17 (42.5%)
Allow the claim and award substantial damages.
5 (12.5%)
Allow the claim and award token damages.
18 (45%)

Total Members Voted: 33

Voting closed: February 27, 2015, 02:50:24 PM

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 33 34 [35] 36 37 ... 55   Go Down

Author Topic: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.  (Read 147160 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.
« Reply #510 on: January 25, 2015, 09:24:49 PM »
Quote from: stephen25000 on January 25, 2015, 09:20:58 PM
It's not closed.

Invitation only.

why suddenly so coy
Logged

Offline DCI

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2585
  • Total likes: 6
  • Why are some folks so sick in the head!!!
Re: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.
« Reply #511 on: January 25, 2015, 09:26:27 PM »
Quote from: davel on January 25, 2015, 09:09:53 PM
try this one...why has morais closed her site if the news is so good

Her Twitter has gone too. Page doesn't exist.
Logged
Kate's 500 Mile Cycle Challenge

https://www.justgiving.com/KateMcCann/

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.
« Reply #512 on: January 25, 2015, 09:27:53 PM »
Quote from: DCI on January 25, 2015, 09:26:27 PM
Her Twitter has gone too. Page doesn't exist.

silence speaks a thousand words
Logged

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.
« Reply #513 on: January 25, 2015, 09:29:18 PM »
Quote from: DCI on January 25, 2015, 09:26:27 PM
Her Twitter has gone too. Page doesn't exist.

along with other pointers...this leads me to believe the news is bad for amaral
Logged

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.
« Reply #514 on: January 25, 2015, 09:29:39 PM »
Quote from: davel on January 25, 2015, 09:24:49 PM
why suddenly so coy

I have no idea.

However, it doesn't mean the mccanns won the case dave .

Logged

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.
« Reply #515 on: January 25, 2015, 09:30:00 PM »
Quote from: davel on January 25, 2015, 09:29:18 PM
along with other pointers...this leads me to believe the news is bad for amaral

Twitter politics davel 8(0(*
Logged

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.
« Reply #516 on: January 25, 2015, 09:31:01 PM »
Quote from: davel on January 25, 2015, 09:29:18 PM
along with other pointers...this leads me to believe the news is bad for amaral

The pointers are Dave, the McCann's are up the creek without a paddle.

As you are with your claims of victory.
« Last Edit: January 25, 2015, 09:36:08 PM by stephen25000 »
Logged

Offline misty

Re: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.
« Reply #517 on: January 25, 2015, 09:35:14 PM »
Perhaps someone has been arrested for breaking judicial secrecy laws.
Logged

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.
« Reply #518 on: January 25, 2015, 09:36:51 PM »
Quote from: stephen25000 on January 25, 2015, 09:31:01 PM
The pointers are Dave, the McCann's are up thge creek without a paddle.

As you are with your claims of victory.

either way the verdict will have little impact on the mccanns.....but could have  a massive impact on amaral
Logged

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.
« Reply #519 on: January 25, 2015, 09:38:52 PM »
Quote from: davel on January 25, 2015, 09:36:51 PM
either way the verdict will have little impact on the mccanns.....but could have  a massive impact on amaral

Getting your excuses in early?
Logged
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.
« Reply #520 on: January 25, 2015, 09:39:06 PM »
Quote from: davel on January 25, 2015, 09:36:51 PM
either way the verdict will have little impact on the mccanns.....but could have  a massive impact on amaral

Wrong way round.

The McCann's face huge legal bills.
Logged

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.
« Reply #521 on: January 25, 2015, 09:51:23 PM »
Quote from: stephen25000 on January 25, 2015, 09:39:06 PM
Wrong way round.

The McCann's face huge legal bills.

tell me Stephen...just an academic point...is a civil judgement in Portugal enforceable in the UK...don't expect you will know the answer to this highly relevant question
Logged

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.
« Reply #522 on: January 25, 2015, 09:53:03 PM »
Quote from: davel on January 25, 2015, 09:51:23 PM
tell me Stephen...just an academic point...is a civil judgement in Portugal enforceable in the UK...don't expect you will know the answer to this highly relevant question

So you are suggesting the McCs are going to do a runner?
Logged
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline jassi

Re: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.
« Reply #523 on: January 25, 2015, 09:53:51 PM »
That'll enhance their reputation.
Logged
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.
« Reply #524 on: January 25, 2015, 09:54:29 PM »
Quote from: davel on January 25, 2015, 09:51:23 PM
tell me Stephen...just an academic point...is a civil judgement in Portugal enforceable in the UK...don't expect you will know the answer to this highly relevant question

Why would you know, one way or the other, unless of course, you are tied to the McCann's directly ?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 33 34 [35] 36 37 ... 55   Go Up
« previous next »