Poll

Do you think the judge will...

Rule case dismissed.
17 (42.5%)
Allow the claim and award substantial damages.
5 (12.5%)
Allow the claim and award token damages.
18 (45%)

Total Members Voted: 33

Voting closed: February 27, 2015, 02:50:24 PM

Author Topic: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.  (Read 147379 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

So every paper except the Express has got it wrong ? Is that what you are trying to say ?

If you actually read what each paper says...apart from this one...they have it right...each gives its own spin but no one can deny the judge ruled the book has damaged the mccanns.

Remember a glass can be half full or half empty.. .yet full and empty are opposites

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
If you actually read what each paper says...apart from this one...they have it right...each gives its own spin but no one can deny the judge ruled the book has damaged the mccanns.

Remember a glass can be half full or half empty.. .yet full and empty are opposites
Nicely put.

Offline Alice Purjorick

If you actually read what each paper says...apart from this one...they have it right...each gives its own spin but no one can deny the judge ruled the book has damaged the mccanns.

Remember a glass can be half full or half empty.. .yet full and empty are opposites
?>)()< Technically speaking a glass is always full.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Mr Gray

?>)()< Technically speaking a glass is always full.
like a lot of things on here it's a matter of opinion

Lyall

  • Guest
Remember a glass can be half full or half empty.. .yet full and empty are opposites

Are you suggesting it was a draw? &%+((£

Offline misty

Are you suggesting it was a draw? &%+((£
Someone has won on a split decision, we're just not sure who.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Someone has won on a split decision, we're just not sure who.
And we've got two whole months left in which to argue about it, isn't it marvellous? @)(++(*

Lyall

  • Guest
And we've got two whole months left in which to argue about it, isn't it marvellous? @)(++(*

What's everyone going to do if we never find out? Explode most likely.

Offline Eleanor

What's everyone going to do if we never find out? Explode most likely.

Old soldiers never die, etc.

Offline Mr Gray

Are you suggesting it was a draw? &%+((£

McCanns have won...and will be paid damages.
Part of the case required..

The books to be removed from sale
amaral not to repeat his claims


The books are no longer on sale...amaral is quiet..


what happened to all his books that were returned...where are they

stephen25000

  • Guest
McCanns have won...and will be paid damages.
Part of the case required..

The books to be removed from sale
amaral not to repeat his claims


The books are no longer on sale...amaral is quiet..


what happened to all his books that were returned...where are they

You've been spending too much time in the twilight zone.

The mccanns haven't won anything.

They haven'y proved their case and were unable to provide  any medical evidence as you well know, into showing any psychological damage.

Your persistence in these claims will lead to inevitable conclusions. 8**8:/:



Offline Mr Gray

You've been spending too much time in the twilight zone.

The mccanns haven't won anything.

They haven'y proved their case and were unable to provide  any medical evidence as you well know, into showing any psychological damage.

Your persistence in these claims will lead to inevitable conclusions. 8**8:/:

The judge said damage has been proved

ferryman

  • Guest
McCanns have won...and will be paid damages.
Part of the case required..

The books to be removed from sale
amaral not to repeat his claims


The books are no longer on sale...amaral is quiet..

Was March the given date for the result?

I thought it was February?




what happened to all his books that were returned...where are they

I guess everything is subject to appeal.

I couldn't fathom what basis of appeal there might be.

But apparently, there is one ...

stephen25000

  • Guest
The judge said damage has been proved

What damage dave ?

Many of the mccanns claims were dismissed.

« Last Edit: January 23, 2015, 09:17:40 AM by Eleanor »

Offline Mr Gray

I guess everything is subject to appeal.

I couldn't fathom what basis of appeal there might be.

But apparently, there is one ...

is amaral talking of an appeal?