Poll

Do you think the judge will...

Rule case dismissed.
17 (42.5%)
Allow the claim and award substantial damages.
5 (12.5%)
Allow the claim and award token damages.
18 (45%)

Total Members Voted: 33

Voting closed: February 27, 2015, 02:50:24 PM

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 32 33 [34] 35 36 ... 55   Go Down

Author Topic: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.  (Read 147220 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Moderator

Re: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.
« Reply #495 on: January 25, 2015, 07:57:58 PM »
Quote from: davel on January 25, 2015, 07:38:12 PM
it seems nothing was said in court and the lawyers were given judgements to read...so does anyone know where published judgement has come from?

Davel.  Please resist the urge to post disinformation.  There was a discussion in Court when one of the defence lawyers responded to the judges offer to clarify any aspects of her proof which was unclear to them.

I must add this propensity you have for pedantic fault finding is not constructive.  You were not present on Wednesday so please leave the reporting to those who were.
Logged

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.
« Reply #496 on: January 25, 2015, 08:02:40 PM »
Quote from: Mr Moderator on January 25, 2015, 07:57:58 PM
Davel.  Please resist the urge to post disinformation.  There was a discussion in Court when one of the defence lawyers responded to the judges offer to clarify any aspects of her proof which was unclear to them.

I must add this propensity you have for pedantic fault fnding is not constructive.  You were not present on Wednesday so please leave the reporting to those who were.

I have a propensity for accuracy...it appears the judgement was not read out in court......that's why those who were there do not know what was in the judgement..

My question is ...where has this version of the judgement come..it certainly was not read out in court
Logged

Offline Carana

Re: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.
« Reply #497 on: January 25, 2015, 08:12:25 PM »
Quote from: Montclair on January 25, 2015, 07:40:00 PM
I suggest that if you don't trust these reports you send someone yourself to attend the hearings. The people who bothered to go there don't have to satisfy you.

No need to be aggressive. It was a genuine question to which I thought there may have been a simple answer.
Logged

Offline Mr Moderator

Re: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.
« Reply #498 on: January 25, 2015, 08:13:35 PM »
Quote from: davel on January 25, 2015, 08:02:40 PM
I have a propensity for accuracy...it appears the judgement was not read out in court......that's why those who were there do not know what was in the judgement..

My question is ...where has this version of the judgement come..it certainly was not read out in court

The proof was copied to interested parties by those who received it including representatives of the Portuguese daily, Correio da Manha.  The judge agreed at the outset that the public would not be barred from sittings thus secrecy is not a feature of these proceedings.
« Last Edit: January 25, 2015, 08:20:37 PM by Mr Moderator »
Logged

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.
« Reply #499 on: January 25, 2015, 08:29:09 PM »
Quote from: davel on January 25, 2015, 08:02:40 PM
I have a propensity for accuracy...it appears the judgement was not read out in court......that's why those who were there do not know what was in the judgement..

My question is ...where has this version of the judgement come..it certainly was not read out in court

That is matter of opinion.

Your judgement of victory for the McCann's clearly incorrect.  %£&)**# %£&)**# %£&)**#
Logged

Offline Carana

Re: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.
« Reply #500 on: January 25, 2015, 08:30:00 PM »
It wasn't a private hearing, therefore I would presume that the media could request a copy from the lawyers  couldn't they?

If they have done, then various media outlets may place a different emphasis on certain parts. This has been the case since day one, with headlines of "Madeleine is dead" and "Madeleine is alive" appearing in headlines on the same day.
Logged

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.
« Reply #501 on: January 25, 2015, 08:42:32 PM »
Quote from: stephen25000 on January 25, 2015, 08:29:09 PM
That is matter of opinion.

Your judgement of victory for the McCann's clearly incorrect.  %£&)**# %£&)**# %£&)**#

no its fact...the judgement was not read out in court
Logged

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.
« Reply #502 on: January 25, 2015, 08:44:46 PM »
Quote from: Carana on January 25, 2015, 08:30:00 PM
It wasn't a private hearing, therefore I would presume that the media could request a copy from the lawyers  couldn't they?

If they have done, then various media outlets may place a different emphasis on certain parts. This has been the case since day one, with headlines of "Madeleine is dead" and "Madeleine is alive" appearing in headlines on the same day.

you presume?
Logged

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.
« Reply #503 on: January 25, 2015, 08:58:31 PM »
Quote from: davel on January 25, 2015, 08:43:34 PM
do you know how accurate it is

Talk about clutching at straws.

You know it really helps if you don't go on here all the time, then when you start catching up the desperation becomes apparent.
Logged
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Angelo222

Re: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.
« Reply #504 on: January 25, 2015, 09:00:19 PM »
Quote from: davel on January 25, 2015, 08:44:46 PM
you presume?

What's your problem tonight Dave?   Is it because you were WRONG about the book damaging the search?   %£&)**#  @)(++(*

I'm not one to gloat mate but....spectacular FAIL !!   *&*%£
« Last Edit: January 25, 2015, 09:04:08 PM by Angelo222 »
Logged
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.
« Reply #505 on: January 25, 2015, 09:03:46 PM »
Quote from: davel on January 25, 2015, 08:55:26 PM
try reading the post

Is it that your just incapable of seeing the obvious ?
Logged

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.
« Reply #506 on: January 25, 2015, 09:07:14 PM »
Quote from: Angelo222 on January 25, 2015, 09:00:19 PM
What's your problem tonight Dave?   Is it because you were WRONG about the book damaging the search?   %£&)**#  @)(++(*

I'm not one to gloat mate but....spectacular FAIL !!   *&*%£

try and address any post I have made...
Logged

Offline Angelo222

Re: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.
« Reply #507 on: January 25, 2015, 09:08:26 PM »
Quote from: davel on January 25, 2015, 09:07:14 PM
try and address any post I have made...

There's so many, where do I begin?  8)><(
Logged
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.
« Reply #508 on: January 25, 2015, 09:09:53 PM »
Quote from: Angelo222 on January 25, 2015, 09:08:26 PM
There's so many, where do I begin?  8)><(

try this one...why has morais closed her site if the news is so good
Logged

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.
« Reply #509 on: January 25, 2015, 09:20:58 PM »
Quote from: davel on January 25, 2015, 09:09:53 PM
try this one...why has morais closed her site if the news is so good

It's not closed.

Invitation only.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 32 33 [34] 35 36 ... 55   Go Up
« previous next »