Luke Mitchell - Witness Scott Forbes

[Nicholas]

Further updates to Part 4 re gougers and blaggers Sandra Lean and Scott Forbes
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/08/21/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-4/

[Nicholas]

DF had not sorted and prepared copied case files to give to LM until around 2008/9, had he? They were not handed to a Phil/His student in 2006. Seriously? Who claims they were piled high ("30 boxes") in his spare room. SL after doing an elective in paralegal work obtained POA in 2009 and claims this was her first access to them.

First question. Are you lying Scott Charles Forbes when you state you had those defence papers in your bedroom/come study? In 2006? Can we see the sworn statement from Luke Mitchell you say took place in 2006? The one in which he stated he would not lie to you? And IF you actually did have some form of copies, how therefore legally, did you manage to obtain these? You being a lawyer (cough) know the law, do you not?

One thing is for sure, you far outweigh her academically, a clear genius, are you not? People are certainly putting your masterpiece far above anything SL has done. When hers was supposed to be the "everything" people needed to know - Have a word!

Two kindred spirits both claiming to have been working on LM as a MOJ since day dot almost, one having signed statements and case files long before the other? Yet claim never to have met the other until 2008? - Have a word

Ambedkar
@Ambedka39148229
Replying to
@HiddenInjustice
What an imbecile, a despicable one at that. I'm reporting you to police for Stalking me. Get facts correct, I didn't give Dr Lean access to paper work on luke mitchell, Dr Lean gave me the paper work in 2006.....you absolute clown
3:36 PM · Sep 1, 2022·Twitter for Android
https://twitter.com/Ambedka39148229/status/1565347841312034816

On the 28th of March 2021 Sandra Lean stated https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RGhh114oQBw&feature=youtu.be (from approximately 10:44)
👇
”Next thing on this weeks agenda

Scott Forbes

Now I’ve seen so much stuff about Scott all over the place some of it very disparaging so I’d like to set the record straight on Scott’s involvement in all of this

So in 2006 this man walked into Scott’s caravans to speak to Corrine about some information that he had that he’d been trying to give to, initially the police and laterally Luke’s legal team, and nobody was listening to him

So that was where Scott Forbes involvement began

He was, obviously, trashed by the prosecution erm they they made up all sorts of utter nonsense about him to discredit his story and that that in itself was bad enough if you like

Now fast forward a couple of years and I’m studying for my PhD at Stirling university and Scott’s also studying at Stirling university so we started we we’d meet up for coffee now and again ‘cos I wasn’t up in Stirling very often we we’d meet up for coffee and we’d chat about the case

And then Scott became involved with Luke’s legal team as a trainee solicitor

He also became involved in another case in Scotland that he did some absolutely fantastic work on …..”


A partial transcript of Sandra Leans statement can be found here
👇
https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/08/21/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-4/

Angeline aka Sandra Lean

Apr 11, 2010#325
Luke was alibied from around quarter to six - he was seen on a wall at the end of his street by some boys from school then, and about ten minutes later, and then was with Mr High. The critical time, between 5pm and 5.45, is the time that apparently no-one can confirm his whereabouts.

The extent of the DNA evidence was not known to the family until they changed legal teams, following the failed appeal, as the previous team had not disclosed it to them. The DNA from Falconer was known about, as was the match to Kelly. Kelly was brought up at trial, and the presence of his DNA allowed to be "explained away."

For reasons which were never explained, the team dropped interest in Falconer during the appeal. As Corinne has pointed out, they were not told a great many things that they should have been told.

The family did not know, until after the failed appeal, that there had been a "misunderstanding" between SLAB and the defence team - they were told that the DNA could not be tested for the defence because SLAB had refused to fund it. Numerous questions regarding paying for testing themselves were ignored.

The rest of the DNA evidence has come to light since legal teams have changed.

[Nicholas]

4th Feb 2010
reg126 aka Billy Middleton
Until the last few days when I started an interest in the Luke Mitchell case I knew very little about it…

11th April 2010
Guest1
Do we know what time JOF claims to have been at the scene when he left the used condom? I would say Mr Falconer and friend but according to him he was there by himself.

Nugnug
he said 9pm and he filled the condom up on his own and no one was with him and he never spoted a dead body 50 yards away from him
oh well i suppose stranger things have happened

Guest1
It was still light at 9pm how could he not have seen a body.
So he was on his own, tidy enough to use a condom,then threw it on the ground...and the police bought this...unbelievable!

12th April 2010
Corinne Mitchell
i asked many men this question and they were all somewhat confused. maybe there's a male poster out there who could explain why? when you are,how shall I put it,......having a SELF sexual experience.....why would you wear a condom???? the majority of men hate wearing them..so if you don't have to,why bother?
Since finding out about this I can't believe the police and Findlay accepted his explanation and as said above...how didn't he see a body?????

[Nicholas]

27th February 2010
Angeline aka Sandra Lean
Although the evidence seems to suggest that Jodi was killed behind the wall (blood spray on the wall), this does not rule out the possibility that she was held somewhere before she was killed, or even that she went somewhere voluntarily.

28th February 2010
Angeline aka Sandra Lean
Fairly early in the investigation, during one of the searches of the Mitchell family home, officers were told specifically to look for anything connected with Marilyn Manson. One investigating officer, it appears, found the Dahlia paintings on a website.
However, later discoveries have shown that at least some members of the investigating team had already been alerted to a possible Manson/Dahlia connection, but with regard to a completely different suspect - I suspect that this was transferred onto Luke either because in the mass of information flooding into the incident room, it was simply not noticed that this referred to someone other than Luke, or, perhaps cynically, that it offered an opportunity to blacken Luke's character, even if it amounted to nothing (which, in the event, is exactly what happened.)

[Nicholas]

On the 28th of March 2021 Sandra Lean stated https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RGhh114oQBw&feature=youtu.be (from approximately 10:44)
👇
”Next thing on this weeks agenda

Scott Forbes

Now I’ve seen so much stuff about Scott all over the place some of it very disparaging so I’d like to set the record straight on Scott’s involvement in all of this

So in 2006 this man walked into Scott’s caravans to speak to Corrine about some information that he had that he’d been trying to give to, initially the police and laterally Luke’s legal team, and nobody was listening to him

So that was where Scott Forbes involvement began

And according to Scott Forbes, Sandra lean gave Scott the paperwork in 2006

[Nicholas]

Part 40
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/09/03/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-40/

[Nicholas]

Part 41 - Sandra Lean’s recent blatant lies
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/09/03/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-41/

[Nicholas]

Further updates to Part 17d of the ongoing blog series Quite A Hall Tale
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/08/04/quite-a-hall-tale-part-17d%ef%b8%8f/

[Nicholas]

Ambedkar
@Ambedka39148229
Replying to
@HiddenInjustice
What an imbecile, a despicable one at that. I'm reporting you to police for Stalking me. Get facts correct, I didn't give Dr Lean access to paper work on luke mitchell, Dr Lean gave me the paper work in 2006.....you absolute clown
3:36 PM · Sep 1, 2022·Twitter for Android
https://twitter.com/Ambedka39148229/status/1565347841312034816

8th April 2010
Corinne Mitchell
Nugnug is well versed with info....because they read "No Smoke" ..as I have said before.....maybe you should

The "tho" thing. I suggest you read that bit again,.,...That was ME saying that.

Sandra didnt become Power of Attorney till well after the appeal...you are ahead of yourself there.

You said "the first thing I would say .............is sack him instantly.
Well you are forgetting Luke was a 16yr old boy with no experience....you, however are a grown man with plenty experience

I had no "experts " on hand at time of trial and waiting for the appeal
.....SEEMPLES.... TCH!

[Nicholas]

Scott Forbes and Sandra Lean are completely and utterly deluded  🤣🤣

Stephanie (Hall) has one twitter account

She has had no direct contact with Sandra Lean since 2017 here
👇
https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8086.msg382408.html#msg382408

And Stephanie does not knowingly communicate directly with @Ambedker/Scott Forbes on Twitter although she has been made aware that Scott Forbes is seemingly accusing anyone and everyone of being Stephanie (Hall) like here for
example
👇
https://twitter.com/AldoT75292320/status/1562507679649927170

Similar to what he and Sandra Lean have been doing with regards killer Luke Mitchell’s murderous and sadistic crime and attempting to blame innocent people for LM’s murder of [Name removed]

[Nicholas]

If you are reading this Scott Forbes

You have been and are being used and duped by Sandra Lean and sadistic and psychopathic killer Luke Mitchell and his deceptive mother Corinne

or maybe you know full well what you have been doing, and are doing, and are as deceitful and manipulative as they (the Mitchell’s and Lean) all are

[Nicholas]

Talk about tunnel vision

[Nicholas]

(Free insight available on Amazon of "Long Walk to Justice")

To SL
The actual truth, I know, that hard to conceive word for some? MK's day was not a blur prior to "running" to catch the shop to buy booze before it closed. Again, truth, the ultimate proof from the CCTV footage and of course communication with the employee. There were no scratches upon MK's face at this point. Perfectly fit and able to run to catch that shop.

He buys his booze and drinks it in the Abbey woods, it is after 10pm at night, not long before darkness falls. He wakes up in the morning and hears there has been a murder in the woods near to the Abbey. For goodness sake screw your head on the right way! LK cycled up that very path and he was worried, agitated even, for he had been in the vicinity! The boys on the moped the same.

Does it matter apart from the usual predictive way of taken a slithering of truth and building it into sheer fantasy! This male (SF's) who saw the light this past year, after, by his claims, the zillionth time of studying the case! It is bye MK, you are demoted as he has finally solved the murder - Have a word!

DF had not sorted and prepared copied case files to give to LM until around 2008/9, had he? They were not handed to a Phil/His student in 2006. Seriously? Who claims they were piled high ("30 boxes") in his spare room. SL after doing an elective in paralegal work obtained POA in 2009 and claims this was her first access to them.

First question. Are you lying Scott Charles Forbes when you state you had those defence papers in your bedroom/come study? In 2006? Can we see the sworn statement from Luke Mitchell you say took place in 2006? The one in which he stated he would not lie to you? And IF you actually did have some form of copies, how therefore legally, did you manage to obtain these? You being a lawyer (cough) know the law, do you not?
 This was under his alias Ambedkar on the 4/08?

Are you talking of your friend here Mr Forbes? We all know without any doubt how one pounces upon others' grammar. One thing is for sure, you far outweigh her academically, a clear genius, are you not? People are certainly putting your masterpiece far above anything SL has done. When hers was supposed to be the "everything" people needed to know - Have a word!

Transparent. The censored to the uncensored. And all the while as the hypocrites soak it all up, there is still nothing directly from LM and his mother. Which of course defeats all purpose of deflection and placing focus elsewhere. Working its magic for the intellectually inept. The die hard elite, who believed everything they read in the rags, who are still believing everything they read in these rags, are they not?

Two kindred spirits both claiming to have been working on LM as a MOJ since day dot almost, one having signed statements and case files long before the other? Yet claim never to have met the other until 2008? - Have a word.

Scott Charles Forbes was lying - again

[Nicholas]

Part 48 Liar Scott C Forbes & Those 30 Boxes
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/09/05/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-48/

[Nicholas]

Part 49 More Lies From Fantasist & Blagger Scott C Forbes & Charlatan & Fraudster Sandra Lean
👇
Facts v’s Myths
https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/09/06/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-49/