Author Topic: Were there too many leaks in the Madeleine McCann case?  (Read 20067 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Carana

Re: Were there too many leaks in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #75 on: January 31, 2015, 06:49:58 PM »
CdaM

13.09.2007 13:01 Kate chama histéricos aos filhos no diário O diário de Kate é fundamental para os investigadores da Polícia Judiciária, que o encontraram aberto na vivenda alugada pelos McCann depois do desaparecimento de Madeleine do Ocean Club.

Ler mais em: http://www.cmjornal.xl.pt/exclusivos/detalhe/kate-chama-histericos-aos-filhos-no-diario.html

The next day something similar ends up in El Mundo:

LA PRENSA PUBLICA ALGUNOS EXTRACTOS
Kate McCann se quejaba en su diario del agotador exceso de vitalidad de Madeleine

Vídeo: Atlas
Actualizado viernes 14/09/2007 11:04

No bylines on either.

Offline Brietta

Re: Were there too many leaks in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #76 on: January 31, 2015, 08:19:08 PM »


Madeleine McCann: police chief breaks silence

12:01AM BST 23 Sep 2007

It was a moment of quiet satisfaction for Chief Inspector Olegario Sousa.

Since making his sudden, dramatic announcement exactly one week ago, that he was no longer prepared to act as the official Portuguese police spokesman in the Madeleine McCann investigation, he had pretty much maintained his silence.

To a tight trio of trusted colleagues he had confided that he was ''unhappy" about the inquiry and ''exasperated" with the constant leaks from junior officers who, in exchange for extravagant meals, were willing to either reveal snippets of confidential information, or to embroider vague facts if they felt that was what their moles in the Portuguese media wanted.

In public he has said nothing.

But this weekend Mr Sousa, for four months the public face of the Portuguese inquiry into Madeleine's disappearance, has come clean.

He has made it clear to friends that he feels his resignation has been vindicated – and why.

He has acknowledged that the leaks were intended to push Kate and Gerry McCann into confessing they had killed their daughter.

More crucially, he believes that the concerted fightback by the McCanns will reveal that, for all the police posturing when they named the couple as suspects, their evidence was at best flimsy, at worst supposition. ''He has told me he always worried that the evidence against the McCanns was weak," says one former policeman. ''He was worried it would not bear scrutiny."

It has not been Mr Sousa's only concern over the investigation.

He also feels that he has been dragged into a war of words.
"He told me he felt caught in the middle of a propaganda war between his police colleagues and the McCanns," another investigator who has spoken to Mr Sousa confirmed.

He has complained that while fellow officers were leaking information illegally — Portugal has strict secrecy laws — the same officers would instruct him to deny the stories when printed. The problem for Sousa was that the denials rarely got into the media.

The result has been endless column inches slandering the McCanns. ''Some Portuguese journalists were fairly convinced the so-called evidence passed on to them by police was nowhere near as concrete as their sources suggested," says Jose Lugios, a freelance reporter based in the Algarve.

"The way it works here is that we can't get official police comments so we have to rely on tip-offs from them. We know they use us at times?…?as they did when they drip-fed us snippets that might exert enough pressure on the McCanns to confess.

But that's the strange way it works. It's the only way we can get crime stories."

Such lax practice has shocked even the country's politicians. ''The leaks to the press of some details that are supposed to be classified have been used as an easy way to manipulate and shape public opinion," says Francisco Louçã, leader of a Portuguese opposition party.

''It is clear the leaks have been used in a battle to turn public opinion against the McCanns and convince people they are guilty when there is no concrete evidence to support this," said another politician, who asked to remain anonymous.

For months the McCanns have been angered by snide suggestions that their PR machine, dubbed Team McCann — a term they hate — is too slick.

The truth is that it has not been, until now.

In Praia da Luz it was little more than a borrowed fax, two mobile telephones and Gerry McCann's Apple laptop. And while friends and family in the UK did what they could, in Portugal the McCanns had only one official spokesman, provided and paid for initially by the Foreign Office.

Last week that became a six-strong team, top-heavy on legal experts and media representatives.

That transformation was borne of necessity.

Not least because Mr Sousa's observation is nearer to the truth than he may know.
What began as a tale of heartbreaking loss has become a fierce propaganda battle, punctuated by smears and in-fighting. For an increasingly embittered Portuguese police force, to lose such a battle would mean world-wide ridicule, allegations that they have attempted to "fit up" an innocent mother and accusations from a £2.8 billion tourism industry that they were ruining the Algarve's reputation.

Yesterday there was additional embarrassment when it emerged unofficially that Robert Murat, the only other suspect in the case, is unlikely to face charges.

But the greater tragedy is that Madeleine's fate – to her parents' anguish – appears to have been forgotten.

Instead the propaganda war has led to lurid headlines such as "The DNA found in the McCanns' rented Renault Scenic, is 100 per cent positively that of Madeleine" and "McCanns killed Maddie with an accidental overdose of sedative".

Kate has been attacked as an unfit mother, who could not cope with her three toddlers and resented bearing the bulk of the child care; she had "lost control" in police interviews — proof, Portuguese officers concluded, that she was capable of having harmed her child; the sniffer dogs "reacted wildly to the scent of death" in the McCanns' car.

Then, on Friday, came the allegation that there were six hours of Madeleine's life unaccounted for on the afternoon of her disappearance. It was an accusation swiftly denied by Kate McCann's friends, who have consistently substantiated the family's version of events.

"The Portimão police were definitely furious that they were depicted as bumbling and ineffectual," confirms a Portuguese officer from another force. "They were especially furious about stories of their long, drunken lunches and their alleged willingness to force a confession to cover their ineffectual investigations.

They know they made mistakes – a whole catalogue – from failing to secure the crime scene, to leaving the border with Spain open for a further twelve hours after Madeleine vanished, to returning the hire car to the McCanns despite having allegedly found incriminating evidence inside.

But their own press would never write critically of them – they need to keep the relationship sweet. It was a slap in the face and a shock when the British press not only branded them inept but heaped ridicule upon them, too."

Chief Inspector Sousa could only look on in despair.
He knew that these leaks were long on exaggeration.

Then came the McCann retaliation which, Mr Sousa must have known, would be brisk, logical and based on sound facts.

Possibly unnerved by a recent British newspaper poll which revealed that only 20 per cent of the public considered them utterly innocent, and that almost half thought they could have been involved in their daughter's death, the couple's response was swift.

Within hours of an announcement by the Portuguese attorney general that local police had not gathered enough evidence yet to press charges against them, the McCanns had re-hired Clarence Mitchell, a former BBC reporter who had originally been assigned to them by the Foreign Office.

Mitchell, canny, erudite and well versed in media hardball — whose salary, it is believed, is being covered by Brian Kennedy, the millionaire owner of Sale Sharks rugby club — turned the couple from victims to combatants. He succinctly rebuffed the flimsy evidence against them, telling the Portuguese authorities to "put up or shut up".

Perhaps more significantly, the couple also swiftly assembled a world-class team of lawyers

Privately they admitted to relatives that they had been against seeking legal counsel: now they had no option. "Was it naivety or just total belief in their own innocence that they didn't think they needed a lawyer?" asks Gerry's brother John. "They were so convinced that because of their close collaboration with the police they didn't need one." Now, of course, they are all too aware that this "close collaboration" was a smokescreen: they did not realise was that the Portuguese police's efforts to find Madeleine had been lacklustre for some time.

Unbeknown to the McCanns, investigators had quickly decided Madeleine died the night she vanished.
All involved with the fightback are convinced of the McCanns' innocence.

But they acknowledge that the couple's public support has been battered by weeks of lurid allegations originating from the Portuguese police.

This weekend Kate and Gerry McCann are staying out of the media limelight. "Let's call it regrouping, re-energising," says a friend. "But make no mistake: while their primary, vital, aim is to keep the hunt for their daughter alive, they are aware that if they are not to risk ending up doing so from behind prison bars they must clear their names.

For they know, and we know, that the McCanns did not kill their daughter."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1563938/Madeleine-McCann-police-chief-breaks-silence.html
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Were there too many leaks in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #77 on: January 31, 2015, 09:49:47 PM »

Madeleine McCann: police chief breaks silence

12:01AM BST 23 Sep 2007

It was a moment of quiet satisfaction for Chief Inspector Olegario Sousa.

Since making his sudden, dramatic announcement exactly one week ago, that he was no longer prepared to act as the official Portuguese police spokesman in the Madeleine McCann investigation, he had pretty much maintained his silence.

To a tight trio of trusted colleagues he had confided that he was ''unhappy" about the inquiry and ''exasperated" with the constant leaks from junior officers who, in exchange for extravagant meals, were willing to either reveal snippets of confidential information, or to embroider vague facts if they felt that was what their moles in the Portuguese media wanted.

In public he has said nothing.

But this weekend Mr Sousa, for four months the public face of the Portuguese inquiry into Madeleine's disappearance, has come clean.

He has made it clear to friends that he feels his resignation has been vindicated – and why.

He has acknowledged that the leaks were intended to push Kate and Gerry McCann into confessing they had killed their daughter.

More crucially, he believes that the concerted fightback by the McCanns will reveal that, for all the police posturing when they named the couple as suspects, their evidence was at best flimsy, at worst supposition. ''He has told me he always worried that the evidence against the McCanns was weak," says one former policeman. ''He was worried it would not bear scrutiny."

It has not been Mr Sousa's only concern over the investigation.

He also feels that he has been dragged into a war of words.
"He told me he felt caught in the middle of a propaganda war between his police colleagues and the McCanns," another investigator who has spoken to Mr Sousa confirmed.

He has complained that while fellow officers were leaking information illegally — Portugal has strict secrecy laws — the same officers would instruct him to deny the stories when printed. The problem for Sousa was that the denials rarely got into the media.

The result has been endless column inches slandering the McCanns. ''Some Portuguese journalists were fairly convinced the so-called evidence passed on to them by police was nowhere near as concrete as their sources suggested," says Jose Lugios, a freelance reporter based in the Algarve.

"The way it works here is that we can't get official police comments so we have to rely on tip-offs from them. We know they use us at times?…?as they did when they drip-fed us snippets that might exert enough pressure on the McCanns to confess.

But that's the strange way it works. It's the only way we can get crime stories."

Such lax practice has shocked even the country's politicians. ''The leaks to the press of some details that are supposed to be classified have been used as an easy way to manipulate and shape public opinion," says Francisco Louçã, leader of a Portuguese opposition party.

''It is clear the leaks have been used in a battle to turn public opinion against the McCanns and convince people they are guilty when there is no concrete evidence to support this," said another politician, who asked to remain anonymous.

For months the McCanns have been angered by snide suggestions that their PR machine, dubbed Team McCann — a term they hate — is too slick.

The truth is that it has not been, until now.

In Praia da Luz it was little more than a borrowed fax, two mobile telephones and Gerry McCann's Apple laptop. And while friends and family in the UK did what they could, in Portugal the McCanns had only one official spokesman, provided and paid for initially by the Foreign Office.

Last week that became a six-strong team, top-heavy on legal experts and media representatives.

That transformation was borne of necessity.

Not least because Mr Sousa's observation is nearer to the truth than he may know.
What began as a tale of heartbreaking loss has become a fierce propaganda battle, punctuated by smears and in-fighting. For an increasingly embittered Portuguese police force, to lose such a battle would mean world-wide ridicule, allegations that they have attempted to "fit up" an innocent mother and accusations from a £2.8 billion tourism industry that they were ruining the Algarve's reputation.

Yesterday there was additional embarrassment when it emerged unofficially that Robert Murat, the only other suspect in the case, is unlikely to face charges.

But the greater tragedy is that Madeleine's fate – to her parents' anguish – appears to have been forgotten.

Instead the propaganda war has led to lurid headlines such as "The DNA found in the McCanns' rented Renault Scenic, is 100 per cent positively that of Madeleine" and "McCanns killed Maddie with an accidental overdose of sedative".

Kate has been attacked as an unfit mother, who could not cope with her three toddlers and resented bearing the bulk of the child care; she had "lost control" in police interviews — proof, Portuguese officers concluded, that she was capable of having harmed her child; the sniffer dogs "reacted wildly to the scent of death" in the McCanns' car.

Then, on Friday, came the allegation that there were six hours of Madeleine's life unaccounted for on the afternoon of her disappearance. It was an accusation swiftly denied by Kate McCann's friends, who have consistently substantiated the family's version of events.

"The Portimão police were definitely furious that they were depicted as bumbling and ineffectual," confirms a Portuguese officer from another force. "They were especially furious about stories of their long, drunken lunches and their alleged willingness to force a confession to cover their ineffectual investigations.

They know they made mistakes – a whole catalogue – from failing to secure the crime scene, to leaving the border with Spain open for a further twelve hours after Madeleine vanished, to returning the hire car to the McCanns despite having allegedly found incriminating evidence inside.

But their own press would never write critically of them – they need to keep the relationship sweet. It was a slap in the face and a shock when the British press not only branded them inept but heaped ridicule upon them, too."

Chief Inspector Sousa could only look on in despair.
He knew that these leaks were long on exaggeration.

Then came the McCann retaliation which, Mr Sousa must have known, would be brisk, logical and based on sound facts.

Possibly unnerved by a recent British newspaper poll which revealed that only 20 per cent of the public considered them utterly innocent, and that almost half thought they could have been involved in their daughter's death, the couple's response was swift.

Within hours of an announcement by the Portuguese attorney general that local police had not gathered enough evidence yet to press charges against them, the McCanns had re-hired Clarence Mitchell, a former BBC reporter who had originally been assigned to them by the Foreign Office.

Mitchell, canny, erudite and well versed in media hardball — whose salary, it is believed, is being covered by Brian Kennedy, the millionaire owner of Sale Sharks rugby club — turned the couple from victims to combatants. He succinctly rebuffed the flimsy evidence against them, telling the Portuguese authorities to "put up or shut up".

Perhaps more significantly, the couple also swiftly assembled a world-class team of lawyers

Privately they admitted to relatives that they had been against seeking legal counsel: now they had no option. "Was it naivety or just total belief in their own innocence that they didn't think they needed a lawyer?" asks Gerry's brother John. "They were so convinced that because of their close collaboration with the police they didn't need one." Now, of course, they are all too aware that this "close collaboration" was a smokescreen: they did not realise was that the Portuguese police's efforts to find Madeleine had been lacklustre for some time.

Unbeknown to the McCanns, investigators had quickly decided Madeleine died the night she vanished.
All involved with the fightback are convinced of the McCanns' innocence.

But they acknowledge that the couple's public support has been battered by weeks of lurid allegations originating from the Portuguese police.

This weekend Kate and Gerry McCann are staying out of the media limelight. "Let's call it regrouping, re-energising," says a friend. "But make no mistake: while their primary, vital, aim is to keep the hunt for their daughter alive, they are aware that if they are not to risk ending up doing so from behind prison bars they must clear their names.

For they know, and we know, that the McCanns did not kill their daughter."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1563938/Madeleine-McCann-police-chief-breaks-silence.html

what a great article...the only surprise is how some people pretend this isn't true whilst those with any sense realise exactly what was happening. it is the disgraceful behaviour of the Portuguese police and journalists that has spawned this on line abuse against the McCanns

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Were there too many leaks in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #78 on: January 31, 2015, 10:05:30 PM »
what a great article...the only surprise is how some people pretend this isn't true whilst those with any sense realise exactly what was happening. it is the disgraceful behaviour of the Portuguese police and journalists that has spawned this on line abuse against the McCanns
All in the pay of the McCanns they'll say...

Offline Brietta

Re: Were there too many leaks in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #79 on: January 31, 2015, 10:12:39 PM »
what a great article...the only surprise is how some people pretend this isn't true whilst those with any sense realise exactly what was happening. it is the disgraceful behaviour of the Portuguese police and journalists that has spawned this on line abuse against the McCanns


I had never read this particular article before. 

Considering it was written in 2007 it gives a particularly insightful view of events.

Not only is it unequivocal about the how and the why of the leaks, it chronicles their part in the build up of the myths, intended initially as a short term expediency, which have continued to fuel the campaign directed against Madeleine and her family for nearly eight years.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Anna

Re: Were there too many leaks in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #80 on: February 01, 2015, 02:05:51 PM »
Thanks Brietta, Great article.
The words of Mr Sousa, as told by his colleagues, seem to paint the perfect picture of what was really going on behind the scenes.


« Last Edit: February 02, 2015, 10:06:54 AM by Anna »
“You should not honour men more than truth.”
― Plato

Offline faithlilly

Re: Were there too many leaks in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #81 on: February 01, 2015, 11:56:18 PM »
Thanks Brietta, Great article.
The words of Mr Sousa, seem to paint the perfect picture of what was really going on behind the scenes.

Sorry Anna I must have missed those words. As far as I can see there is not one direct quote from Mr Sousa in that article.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Anna

Re: Were there too many leaks in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #82 on: February 02, 2015, 12:10:38 AM »
Sorry Anna I must have missed those words. As far as I can see there is not one direct quote from Mr Sousa in that article.

Of course you are absolutely, correct, Faith.
They are his words as interpreted/conveyed, by his friends/colleagues.

 My apologies for any misunderstanding, my mistake may have caused.
“You should not honour men more than truth.”
― Plato

Offline faithlilly

Re: Were there too many leaks in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #83 on: February 02, 2015, 12:02:50 PM »
Of course you are absolutely, correct, Faith.
They are his words as interpreted/conveyed, by his friends/colleagues.

 My apologies for any misunderstanding, my mistake may have caused.

NP Anna  ?{)(**
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Brietta

Re: Were there too many leaks in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #84 on: February 02, 2015, 02:59:45 PM »
It appears that it didn't take the press leaks directed against Madeleine McCann's parents too long to hit the pages of the Portuguese press ... no time at all, investigative or otherwise for that particular thesis to be determined and publicised before any evidence which might have been relevant could possibly have been gathered, collated and discussed.

The question arises, if the PJ were concentrating on developing a case against  Madeleine McCann's parents and their friends almost immediately ... how much time and energy were they expending on looking for a possible abductor let alone a living recoverable child? 

It appears that the answer to that is ... none.  They never looked for Madeleine McCann.

"This narrative was unfolding at a time when Maddie’s disappearance could still be counted in hours."


taken from
Spinning the Web: The influence of the Internet on the
reporting of crime and criminal justice in traditional
media
Joy Cameron-Dow, MComn

5.2.11 Representation of the criminal justice system

Yet the traditional media were not blameless. Greenhill, & Harris (2007, September 19, para. 1) reported in the Daily Mail that the propaganda campaign began “within 24 hours of Madeleine vanishing,” with a Portuguese police source alerting the daily newspaper Diario de Noticias on May 4 of doubts the child had been abducted.

http://epublications.bond.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1064&context=theses


taken from
Jonbenet and Maddie: Case Studies in the Ethical Deficit of Contemporary Journalism
Professor Michael Tracey
Journalism and Mass Communication
University of Colorado at Boulder
Boulder, Colorado, 80309
USA

2.2 The Case of Madeleine McCann


By the following day at least one detective was telling journalists that there were doubts about whether Madeleine had really been abducted and that “police thought the couple were not telling the truth…” (Chrisman, 2007).

The story appeared the following day, Saturday May 5, in the respected Portuguese newspaper, Diario de Noticias.

The story, headlined “This Is A Very Badly Told Story,”had been written by Jose Manuel Oliveira who had received an off the record briefing by one of the top investigators of the Policia Judiciaria ( PJ ), the Portuguese criminal investigation police and said that “the headline/quote is based on the police and PJ sense that the testimonies gathered from the initial questioning of the McCanns, friends, and staff of the Ocean Club were confusing.

Oliveira believes this report was leaked because the PJ were beginning to have ‘doubts’ about the McCanns – that they were somehow connected or they knew someone who had had something to do with her disappearance – not at this stage that she might be dead.

Astonishingly Oliveria says he got the information from the PJ for this leak by 5pm., on the 4th May – less than 24 hours after Maddie disappeared…” ( Chrisman, 2007).

This was immediately denied by the JP, but on the 7th May Diario de Noticias published an article headlined “Police clues points to Madeleine’s death,” with an inside page headline “Port authority already looking for Madeleine’s body,” citing “police sources.”

At the same time another paper was reporting that police suspicions were based on the couple’s behavior, and one said that detectives “suspected them because their wives said Kate was too controlled to be the distraught mother” while another claimed forensic scientists reported that her controlled public appearance and make up indicated a “cold and manipulative” personality.

This narrative was unfolding at a time when Maddie’s disappearance could still be counted in hours.

http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_3_No_15_August_2013/1.pdf
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Were there too many leaks in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #85 on: February 02, 2015, 03:10:43 PM »
Huge exaggerations, Brietta. They don't really help your cause.

Offline Brietta

Re: Were there too many leaks in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #86 on: February 02, 2015, 03:29:58 PM »
Huge exaggerations, Brietta. They don't really help your cause.

I beg your pardon?
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Carana

Re: Were there too many leaks in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #87 on: February 02, 2015, 03:31:07 PM »
Interesting find, Brietta.

I just found the original:

"Esta é uma história muito mal contada"

por José Manuel Oliveira e Paula Martinheira
05 maio 2007

Uma criança inglesa desapareceu do quarto de hotel onde dormia com os irmãos mais novos, na Praia da Luz, no Algarve, enquanto os pais jantavam num restaurante do aldeamento. Autoridades e populares lançaram-se em megaoperação de busca, já alargada a Espanha.

O desaparecimento de Madeleine McCann, a criança inglesa de três anos que se encontrava de férias em Lagos, "é uma história muito mal contada", confidenciou ao DN fonte da Polícia Judiciária de Portimão. A afirmação reflecte as dúvidas das autoridades face aos depoimentos "confusos" expressos ontem pelas testemunhas ao longo de todo o dia.

(...)

http://www.dn.pt/especiais/interior.aspx?content_id=977892&especial=Caso%20Maddie&seccao=SOCIEDADE

Offline Carana

Re: Were there too many leaks in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #88 on: February 02, 2015, 03:33:16 PM »
That raises another question: if a PJ officer had already said that to the press, then what was that excuse about not doing a reconstruction again? Not wanting them to know that they were suspects? How does that work?

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Were there too many leaks in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #89 on: February 02, 2015, 03:42:24 PM »
I beg your pardon?

The question arises, if the PJ were concentrating on developing a case against  Madeleine McCann's parents and their friends almost immediately ... how much time and energy were they expending on looking for a possible abductor let alone a living recoverable child?

It appears that the answer to that is ... none.  They never looked for Madeleine McCann.


Reads like propaganda.

It is huge exaggeration from the evidence you posted.

It is far more exaggerated than Madeleine's parents themselves have ever said.
« Last Edit: February 02, 2015, 03:44:31 PM by Lyall »