22.00- 22.15 (wrong timing) .for phone call received by Vitor Manuel dos Could it be the 10.57 call which would be just after the second police call and then it would all make sense?
Santos
( John Hill did not arrive until 22.33 so, think this timing is out . Should it read?... 22.40-22.57 )
With regard to the date of the disappearance on 3rd May 2007, he remembers that at 22.00/22.15 received a phone call from receptionist who said that John Hill was agitated
he received a phone call from
the reception, from receptionist Helder, who told him that John Hill was extremely agitated as a child had disappeared and that the GNR had been contacted but had not arrived yet. He added
(the receptionist) that he had phoned the GNR post several times and that he had been told that they would arrive when they could but that they were investigating a theft in Odiaxere.
………….
The receptionist asked (Mr Santos the witness), whether he should contact the PSP, to which the witness replied no, as this area belongs to the GNR. Given the circumstances, the witness thought it best to go to the resort to find out more about the situation.
……………………………
Had to be 23.00+ when, Vitor Santos arrived.When he arrived at the scene about 10 to 15 minutes later, he immediately went to the reception
where the GNR were present, taking a statement from the girl’s father.
....
(Santos must have been called after 10.25, if J Hill was agitated and he had to have arrived after 11pm if the GNR were there, so this timing is way out, by about 30 minutes at least and more if the GNR had been phoned several times, before Santos was called)
http://themaddiecasefiles.com/topic9-10.html