Brenda Leyland. Coroner confirms cause of death as suicide.

[DCI]

And snapped up by the now infamous Martin Brunt ( of course the faithful wouldn't have licked his blood at that time ).

Good old Mr B does seem to have a thing about dossiers !

False information Deliberately given to press by Reiss and friends.

[G-Unit]

"Police say it is the most damning evidence that has been returned by the tests," Brunt said.


Hmmm?

LP held an internal inquiry which was found to be negative concerning leaks. LP knew that the results said no such thing, so what does that leave?

LP had an enquiry? Do you have a source, I can't find anything about it. Thanks 

[Lyall]

Your reasoning is completely nonsensical to me.  Why would the PJ even bother to question them formally if they had no plans to charge them because it would cause a "diplomatic incident"? 

What are you talking about - going "off message"? That's kind of insulting.  It seems to be you who is at odds with yourself.  On the one hand you claim the McCanns wanted everyone to believe that they were about to be arrested and charged, and on the other you say the McCanns claim their arguido status  was just a legal formality - eh?

Yes their message changed once they'd landed back in the UK.

Why would the PJ question them and not just let them go home quietly? Because a child was missing and they're policemen not politicians.

[Alice Purjorick]

Alice, as the resident oracle perhaps you can tell us whether or not it is possible for an arguido to be arrested and charged after one solitary interview with the police?

I haven't a clue I never did Portuguese law. Maybe one of the forum "eagles" [legal rather than Illegal, who are a tribute band] would be better placed to answer they aren't usually backward in coming forward.
Can the English and Welsh police charge someone after only one interview? That might give a clue then again it might not. Just as a punt though I would say that as soon as there is enough evidence for an arrest, bingo and b****r the time or number of interviews. Unless of course there is a convention a bit like three dates and ..............

[Brietta]

It's one of the facebook groups, closed to the public (I'm not a member).

If you knew, why did you ask?  Were you perhaps trying to blow my cover?

[Alfred R Jones]

Yes their message changed once they'd landed back in the UK.

Why would the PJ question them and not just let them go home quietly? Because a child was missing and they're policemen not politicians.

Exactly.  That being the case the McCanns had every reason to fear that they may be arrested and charged. 

[faithlilly]

It's one of the facebook groups, closed to the public (I'm not a member).

Thanks Lyall.

[ferryman]

And snapped up by the now infamous Martin Brunt ( of course the faithful wouldn't have licked his blood at that time ).

Good old Mr B does seem to have a thing about dossiers !

Why do you blame Brunt for honestly reporting what was corruptly released by (presumably) the PJ?

[Lyall]

If you knew, why did you ask?  Were you perhaps trying to blow my cover?

If you're undercover in that group why were you asking is is true what they're saying?

[DCI]

Why do you blame Brunt for honestly reporting what was corruptly released by (presumably) the PJ?

Now who would have had access to the report sent to Mangalese, by the PJ?

[Lyall]

Exactly.  That being the case the McCanns had every reason to fear that they may be arrested and charged.

As I keep saying the PJ don't charge people. Any personal opinions that may have been held by officers in September 2007 meant nothing.

[jassi]

I suppose you would have to start with those who wrote the report and then consider each step in onward  transmission

[Alfred R Jones]

As I keep saying the PJ don't charge people. Any personal opinions that may have been held by officers in September 2007 meant nothing.

So you think that feasibly the police could have gathered a load of damning evidence, presented it to whoever charges people in Portugal and they would have said "on yer bike, McCanns go free" and that the McCanns were smug and cosy knowing this to be the case all along?  Seriously?

[Lyall]

So you think that feasibly the police could have gathered a load of damning evidence, presented it to whoever charges people in Portugal and they would have said "on yer bike, McCanns go free" and that the McCanns were smug and cosy knowing this to be the case all along?  Seriously?

I'm saying that in this case because of the massive, worldwide publicity they needed a great deal of evidence, and it had to be evidence admissible in the court (dog alerts aren't there and everyone would have known it).

[faithlilly]

Now who would have had access to the report sent to Mangalese, by the PJ?

The McCanns and their aides certainly knew.