Brenda Leyland. Coroner confirms cause of death as suicide.

[Angelo222]

what's funny is you talking about people not being exhonerated...as tough as the coroner did not clear Brunt he must carry some guilt...bit like many posters view of the McCanns. Posters on here have decided Brunt is guilty..he isn't

But he is!  Guilty of an apalling lack of empathy and of good judgement but then the appetite for a juicy sleezy story must be overwhelming.  I want to see criminal sanctions for journalists who drive people to kill themselves.

[Mr Gray]

But he is!  Guilty of an apalling lack of empathy and of good judgement but then the appetite for a juicy sleezy story must be overwhelming.

so a bit like Brenda

[Angelo222]

so a bit like Brenda

Was Brenda paid for posting her views which I might add she was perfectly entitled to do?

Can I also add that the Maddie case has not been determined and Brenda did not commit any criminal offence regardless of your own comments to the contrary back in February.

[Alfred R Jones]

Was Brenda paid for posting her views which I might add she was perfectly entitled to do?

Can I also add that the Maddie case has not been determined and Brenda did not commit any criminal offence regardless of your own comments to the contrary back in February.

Nor did Martin Brunt, don't forget that Angelo.

PS: I trust this comment won't get deleted like my others on this thread today!

[Angelo222]

Nor did Martin Brunt, don't forget that Angelo.

PS: I trust this comment won't get deleted like my others on this thread today!

Only off topic and abusive comments are removed.

[G-Unit]

                              The truth is out there for the seekers, G.

I'm not that bothered. I just wondered why people would want to criticise Brenda Leyland's family, that's all.

[Mr Gray]

I'm not that bothered. I just wondered why people would want to criticise Brenda Leyland's family, that's all.

From another forum

I'm sorry that I don't post often, so am rather an outsider here, but I am concerned about a FB group which was ostensibly set up in memory of Brenda Leyland and purported to be supportive of her and her family - https://www.facebook.com/groups/523769381091778/?fref=ts

However, since the inquest, which they regard as a put up job and the whole thing a conspiracy, they appear now to be turning against Brenda and, in particular, her family - and in particular Ben. They say that any normal family/son would be shouting the injustice from the rooftops and, because he isn't, then clearly he cannot be who he says he is. They also say that the law firm he purports to work for doesn't exist in Los Angelese - which is true - strangely.

They have a theory, which appears to be popular, that Brenda never existed - the role played by Brenda when confronted by Martin Brunt, was played by Glenda Jackson (for those outside the UK you may not know that Glenda Jackson, a former actress, is a member of parliament in the UK). They are absolutely determined that the whole thing was a McCann conspiracy, to generate support for the grieving parents, and are working to the ends of proving this. Sadly, in the process, they are slagging off Brenda and her family.

I was a member there but have been banned for trying to correct some of their totally inaccurate statements - things which can be proved. It is not a democratic debate going on there - they don't want to hear from anyone who does not go along with their outrageous theories.

I just wondered if anyone here is also a member there and whether they are, consequently, able to inject some sanity into the so-called debate?

I'm sorry, again, but that website has upset me greatly.

[faithlilly]

I'm not that bothered. I just wondered why people would want to criticise Brenda Leyland's family, that's all.

Do we know that they are ?

So far we only have Brietta's word for it.

[Mr Gray]

Do we know that they are ?

So far we only have Brietta's word for it.

and now Winjoy who posted the above

[Lyall]

From another forum

I'm sorry that I don't post often, so am rather an outsider here, but I am concerned about a FB group which was ostensibly set up in memory of Brenda Leyland and purported to be supportive of her and her family - https://www.facebook.com/groups/523769381091778/?fref=ts

However, since the inquest, which they regard as a put up job and the whole thing a conspiracy, they appear now to be turning against Brenda and, in particular, her family - and in particular Ben. They say that any normal family/son would be shouting the injustice from the rooftops and, because he isn't, then clearly he cannot be who he says he is. They also say that the law firm he purports to work for doesn't exist in Los Angelese - which is true - strangely.

They have a theory, which appears to be popular, that Brenda never existed - the role played by Brenda when confronted by Martin Brunt, was played by Glenda Jackson (for those outside the UK you may not know that Glenda Jackson, a former actress, is a member of parliament in the UK). They are absolutely determined that the whole thing was a McCann conspiracy, to generate support for the grieving parents, and are working to the ends of proving this. Sadly, in the process, they are slagging off Brenda and her family.

I was a member there but have been banned for trying to correct some of their totally inaccurate statements - things which can be proved. It is not a democratic debate going on there - they don't want to hear from anyone who does not go along with their outrageous theories.

I just wondered if anyone here is also a member there and whether they are, consequently, able to inject some sanity into the so-called debate?

I'm sorry, again, but that website has upset me greatly.

Glenda?

They're nuts. But that's what facebook's for isn't it: Nut Heaven?

[misty]

Glenda?

They're nuts. But that's what facebook's for isn't it: Nut Heaven?

I'm sure if they dig hard enough & deep enough they will discover that BL was really murdered by the same MI6 agents who disposed of Gareth Williams. The McCanns have that much power, you know.

[Brietta]

But he is!  Guilty of an apalling lack of empathy and of good judgement but then the appetite for a juicy sleezy story must be overwhelming.  I want to see criminal sanctions for journalists who drive people to kill themselves.

What was "sleazy" about it from Sweeepyface's point of view, she firmly believed that using twitter in the way she did was acceptible? 

Brenda Leyland was perhaps more concerned about neighbours, friends and family and what their opinions might be.

[Brietta]

so a bit like Brenda

Martin Brunt could have had no idea that such a prolific twitter user was fragile.  The horror who left her helpless parents in filth while she squandered money stolen from them on a Spanish frolic bounced back from the publicity without a backward glance.
Why should he have thought Ms Leyland would be any different?

[stephen25000]

what's funny is you talking about people not being exhonerated...as tough as the coroner did not clear Brunt he must carry some guilt...bit like many posters view of the McCanns. Posters on here have decided Brunt is guilty..he isn't

The bottom line remains.

brunt and sky are vigilantes, who went to Leyland on the basis of a lie.

The dossier compilers, clearly cowards to try to hide behind anonymity, afre up there with sky and brunt.

Two days later she was DEAD.

[Brietta]

Glenda?

They're nuts. But that's what facebook's for isn't it: Nut Heaven?

I so admire your chutzpah but it isn't quite coming off ... and that particular 'nut' heaven is well and truly populated by some very unwell people indeed.