Author Topic: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?  (Read 412778 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Angelo222

Re: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #60 on: April 09, 2015, 03:33:30 PM »
Cheers Carana.  Seems there have been a lot of silly mistakes throughout this debacle.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #61 on: April 09, 2015, 03:36:38 PM »
Seems someone got the creche records wrong.

Diagram of Events 58
Day 30-04-2007




Gerald McCann

Kids Club

ROUTINE yesterday she received Madeleine at 09.10, Madeleine was handed over by her father. She looked after Madeleine from Sunday 29-04-2007 daily and until yesterday, always for the same hours.
Catriona Baker page 88
30-04-2007 – 9.10.00

Kate Marie Healy

Kids Club


ROUTINE she handed Madeleine over to her mother at 12.25. She looked after Madeleine from Sunday 29-04-2007, daily and until yesterday, always for the same hours.
Catriona Baker page 88
30-04-2007 12.25.00

Kids Club
ROUTINE she received Madeleine again from her mother at 14.50. She looked after Madeleine daily from Sunday 29-04-2007 until yesterday, always for the same hours.
Catriona Baker page 88
30-04-2007 14.50.00

Kids Club
ROUTINE she handed Madeleine over at 17.30. She looked after Madeleine daily from Sunday 29-04-2007 until yesterday, always for the same hours.
Catriona Baker page 88
30-04-2007 17.30.00


http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/CRECHE.htm#58


Nothing mentioned in the Anomalies re the 30th April.


 http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/CRECHE_ANOMALIES.htm

Strange. The creche time sheets are a mess, perhaps they chose to go by the statements instead? No explanation of that though.
« Last Edit: April 15, 2015, 11:11:24 PM by John »
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Benice

Re: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #62 on: April 09, 2015, 03:47:10 PM »
The twins sheets had disappeared as well. You won't find nothing in Madeleine about that one. It would be interesting to know the time this was taken?



I'd suggested putting the twins up in our apartment, erm, Emma, who was there, had arranged some of the MARK WARNER Nannies to get some extra cots and more bedding, erm, and we set up the cots in our living room and a bed for Kate and Gerry as well, not that they used it, but, erm, and then I think, I think they were Policemen, I can't remember who carried up Sean and Amelie. Erm, and we sat on the sofa, me and Kate with the twins asleep on us for a while, erm, and they didn't wake up and, again, that was quite strange, even in the transfer and, and being handled by people that weren't their parents, they didn't, they didn't wake up. (FP)

The report mentions that the twins were asleep in their bed, but there is no proof to confirm it; on the contrary, in the photographs, you can see empty cots, where only the mattresses remain - the sheets and blankets having been removed. Why have their beds been stripped? If the sheets had not been removed, traces of their presence could have been found there. (TOTL)

Several people saw the twins asleep, including a  policeman IIRC.    The twins were removed during the middle of the night - I imagine they were picked up wrapped in their cot sheets /blankets to guard against the cold outside on the journey to the Payne's appartment.   

For Amaral to claim there is no proof that the twins were asleep in their cots is preposterous and completely untrue.     IMO he is trying to insinuate something sinister to his readers -  where nothing sinister exists.    Par for the course throughout his book imo.      The police could have picked the bedding up the next morning - or better still not allowed it to be taken in the first place - had they done their job properly.  i.e. Nothing should have been  removed from the crime scene until after the forensics bods had finished in there.

 
« Last Edit: April 09, 2015, 04:32:44 PM by Benice »
The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline DCI

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2585
  • Total likes: 6
  • Why are some folks so sick in the head!!!
Re: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #63 on: April 09, 2015, 03:50:20 PM »
Strange. The creche sheets are a mess, perhaps they chose to go by the statements instead? No explanation of that though.

It is isn't it. If you look at the one you posted, othe children were not picked up that day. Not named McCann though!
Kate's 500 Mile Cycle Challenge

https://www.justgiving.com/KateMcCann/

Offline jassi

Re: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #64 on: April 09, 2015, 03:51:15 PM »
Strange. The creche sheets are a mess, perhaps they chose to go by the statements instead? No explanation of that though.

I would have thought a contemporary record more reliable that a later recollection.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #65 on: April 09, 2015, 04:08:03 PM »
It was investigated thoroughly as one would expect.  How many more peasant and gypsy families in Morocco, Romania and Ireland must suffer before this farce ends?

Who investigated it?
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #66 on: April 09, 2015, 04:33:17 PM »
Who investigated it?

Metodo3?
A CRACK new team of private eyes are now hunting missing Maddie McCann - and they are convinced she was snatched TO ORDER by a paedophile gang then SMUGGLED out to Morocco.

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id76.html
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Carana

Re: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #67 on: April 09, 2015, 04:54:17 PM »
Cheers Carana.  Seems there have been a lot of silly mistakes throughout this debacle.

Hopefully, the two police forces have been able to work out what required further investigation and have since done so.

Offline Angelo222

Re: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #68 on: April 09, 2015, 05:13:25 PM »
Who investigated it?

A clue!  It happened in Morocco.  As for Hewlett, had he abducted a little girl and hidden her in his lorry dont you think the rest of his numerous kids would have seen her?

Surely you don't really believe someone would go to the bother of abducting a kid in Portugal only to let her go for a leisurely countryside stroll in some Morocco backwater?  Its too daft for words.
« Last Edit: April 09, 2015, 05:19:40 PM by Angelo222 »
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #69 on: April 09, 2015, 05:46:36 PM »
A clue!  It happened in Morocco.  As for Hewlett, had he abducted a little girl and hidden her in his lorry dont you think the rest of his numerous kids would have seen her?

Surely you don't really believe someone would go to the bother of abducting a kid in Portugal only to let her go for a leisurely countryside stroll in some Morocco backwater?  Its too daft for words.

That's the thing with this case Angelo, to paraphrase Alice, it helps if you believe seven ridiculous things before breakfast !
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #70 on: April 09, 2015, 06:59:47 PM »
Assuming the wake and wandered theory is possible. Why were the shutters open and if so by whom?

If the police believe the parents as it appears they do....then the open window indicates an intruder
« Last Edit: April 15, 2015, 11:14:10 PM by John »

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #71 on: April 09, 2015, 07:02:08 PM »
A clue!  It happened in Morocco.  As for Hewlett, had he abducted a little girl and hidden her in his lorry dont you think the rest of his numerous kids would have seen her?

Surely you don't really believe someone would go to the bother of abducting a kid in Portugal only to let her go for a leisurely countryside stroll in some Morocco backwater?  Its too daft for words.

I know a London journalist 'checked it out' ... I've seen the photographs ... so that will be all right, then?

I have no idea what a pervert like Hewlett might have been capable of ... and his numerous kids may have been too busy hanging on to their obviously precarious position in the vehicle to pay too much attention to the presence of another child.

I don't think Hewlett was the type of parent that the kids would go against in any way whatsoever and he is certainly a man who should have been thoroughly investigated, particularly when his proximity to Praia da Luz is considered.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #72 on: April 09, 2015, 07:44:52 PM »
I know a London journalist 'checked it out' ... I've seen the photographs ... so that will be all right, then?

I have no idea what a pervert like Hewlett might have been capable of ... and his numerous kids may have been too busy hanging on to their obviously precarious position in the vehicle to pay too much attention to the presence of another child.

I don't think Hewlett was the type of parent that the kids would go against in any way whatsoever and he is certainly a man who should have been thoroughly investigated, particularly when his proximity to Praia da Luz is considered.
I thought all this stuff was investigated by M-3 & AIG? Both class acts right out of the top drawer.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #73 on: April 09, 2015, 11:01:00 PM »
[quote removed - off topic]

I wonder if it was the police or the interpreters taking shortcuts? In the McCann's first statements their description of Madeleine is almost identical.
Kate;
Concerning the child's personality, she is extrovert, very active, talkative, smart and relates to other children with great ease. But she would never go with a stranger
Gerald;
As regards personality, the child was extrovert, very active, talkative, alert with an easy relationship with other children. He also says that she would never go with a stranger.
« Last Edit: April 15, 2015, 11:18:53 PM by John »
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline DCI

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2585
  • Total likes: 6
  • Why are some folks so sick in the head!!!
Re: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #74 on: April 09, 2015, 11:15:06 PM »
I wonder if it was the police or the interpreters taking shortcuts? In the McCann's first statements their description of Madeleine is almost identical.
Kate;
Concerning the child's personality, she is extrovert, very active, talkative, smart and relates to other children with great ease. But she would never go with a stranger
Gerald;
As regards personality, the child was extrovert, very active, talkative, alert with an easy relationship with other children. He also says that she would never go with a stranger.

I'd say idolitis on behalf of whoever wrote the statements up. You can't tell me any two people would use the exact same words.
Kate's 500 Mile Cycle Challenge

https://www.justgiving.com/KateMcCann/