Does invoking the right to silence carry with it significant risk?

[misty]

Dont be so pathetic, your personal obsession with robert murat is pathological

Why was it only relevant to the inquiry to establish what Kate, but no other witness bar the GNR officers, had touched or observed within the apartment in the hours that followed?

[mercury]

Why was it only relevant to the inquiry to establish what Kate, but no other witness bar the GNR officers, had touched or observed within the apartment in the hours that followed?

Was Murat ever in the kids bedroom in 5A?

[sadie]

Dont be so pathetic, your personal obsession with robert murat is pathological

Why are you so touchy about Robert Murat mercury ?

misty happens to know that he crossed the tapes so why shouldn't she mention it?

[mercury]

Why are you so touchy about Robert Murat mercury ?

misty happens to know that he crossed the tapes so why shouldn't she mention it?

Ive not seen any evidence he ever entered 5A, but feel free to supply it.

The point is Murat's prints were not found in 5A, so the point was moot. And no, I am not touchy about HIM per se. Only about certain people trying to implicate him without supplying much reason or evidence.

[sadie]

Ive not seen any evidence he ever entered 5A, but feel free to supply it.

The point is Murat's prints were not found in 5A, so the point was moot. And no, I am not touchy about HIM per se. Only about certain people trying to implicate him without supplying much reason or evidence.

If misty posted it, then it is true.  Our side have no reason to tell untruths cos the facts prove what we say.


See mistys post Reply #276 on: Today at 12:10:25 AM

[slartibartfast]

If misty posted it, then it is true.  Our side have no reason to tell untruths cos the facts prove what we say.


See mistys post Reply #276 on: Today at 12:10:25 AM

It doesn't work like that petal.

[misty]

Was Murat ever in the kids bedroom in 5A?

Was he ever asked the question?
Were the nannies asked what they touched? Or Fiona?
Would you like a link to the reports of the people who saw him crossing the crime scene tape or is that a waste of time?

[Montclair]

Could you please substantiate that, Montclair? I have certainly seen nothing to that effect.

I have to apologise, it seems that the questioning is not rigid as in a trial as I had thought. But I have to confirm with someone who is in the know.

[Mr Gray]

I have to apologise, the questioning is not like in a trial as I had thought. But I have to confirm with someone who is in the know.

you don't have to confirm anything...it's obvious you were wrong

[Alfred R Jones]

I have to apologise, it seems that the questioning is not rigid as in a trial as I had thought. But I have to confirm with someone who is in the know.

Great, so the judge wasn't lying but the members of the PJ clearly were re: the DNa results, glad that's sorted.

[Alice Purjorick]

you don't have to confirm anything...it's obvious you were wrong

Says he who thinks compressed gases are stored in tanks and believes a gas isn't a fluid.
Say no more.

[Jean-Pierre]

I have to apologise, it seems that the questioning is not rigid as in a trial as I had thought. But I have to confirm with someone who is in the know.

Thank you for the graceful correction, Montclair. 

[stephen25000]

If misty posted it, then it is true.  Our side have no reason to tell untruths cos the facts prove what we say.


See mistys post Reply #276 on: Today at 12:10:25 AM

 

[Montclair]

Thank you for the graceful correction, Montclair. 

I'm like most people, I don't like being wrong but I'll admit it when I am.

[Montclair]

Great, so the judge wasn't lying but the members of the PJ clearly were re: the DNa results, glad that's sorted.

That's not what I said.