The parents of a missing child don't matter.

[mercury]

Another one who refuses to acknowledge the 8 year plus campaign to try and convince as many people as possible that the McCanns dunnit..

No, sorry, try again

[Alfred R Jones]

No, sorry, try again

Well do you acknowledge there has been a concerted effort to spread suspicion of the McCanns or not?

[Brietta]

Why is it so hard to understand?  I don't know what happened to Madeleine McCann. I have doubts about the story promoted by the parents, and I point that out and that I'm not the only one. I see no point in posting anything of 'me'; I don't even know how to do that. My opinion is of no use at all, nor is anyone else's. I prefer to post about facts if I can, and I do try not to add my own opinion of why something happened.

No-one on this forum or any other knows what happened to Madeleine McCann unless s/he is the perpetrator of the crime.  "Doubting" the victims of the crime while propagating many of the myths and misinformation which have been doing the rounds for over eight years ... may be what is considered a 'polite' way of hounding and harassing them.
It is risible to claim you have no opinion ... or perhaps on occasion you would actually find a fact which shone a positive light on the victims of the crime ... rather than the 'doubters' litany of your preference.

[mercury]

Well do you acknowledge there has been a concerted effort to spread suspicion of the McCanns or not?

As opposed to a massive concerted effort to convince people they are innocent? You mean. LOL
Answer to your question is No by the way...it makes me shudder to think anyone would want to silence people voicing their thoughts in a so called democratic free country under the bullying and threats, quite shocking really, and took large amounts of money out of the Madeleine Fund to boot

[Brietta]

Another one who refuses to acknowledge the 8 year plus campaign to try and convince as many people as possible that the McCanns dunnit..

I think deep, deep down there is a small flicker of recognition that what has been happening to Madeleine McCann's parents is vile and beyond the pale ... that is why participants take pains to disassociate from it.

[mercury]

No-one on this forum or any other knows what happened to Madeleine McCann unless s/he is the perpetrator of the crime.  "Doubting" the victims of the crime while propagating many of the myths and misinformation which have been doing the rounds for over eight years ... may be what is considered a 'polite' way of hounding and harassing them.
It is risible to claim you have no opinion ... or perhaps on occasion you would actually find a fact which shone a positive light on the victims of the crime ... rather than the 'doubters' litany of your preference.

Dont make your assumptions seem like fact please. You have no proof the Mccanns are victims of a crime as you said in your very first words of your post, no one knows.

[Alfred R Jones]

Dont make your assumptions seem like fact please. You have no proof the Mccanns are victims of a crime as you said in your very first words of your post, no one knows.

how about giving them the benefit of the doubt then?

[mercury]

how about giving them the benefit of the doubt then?

Oh,dear Alfred, if only you knew how many times I have. That nagging voice though always tells me something smells. And I want to know what it is if thats Ok with you. You are at liberty though to completely believe the narrative. your life, your choice.

[Alfred R Jones]

Oh,dear Alfred, if only you knew how many times I have. That nagging voice though always tells me something smells. And I want to know what it is if thats Ok with you. You are at liberty though to completely believe the narrative. your life, your choice.

You're very kind, but not kind enough sadly to give the parents of a missing child the benefit of the doubt.  So, carry on slagging them off, it clearly enriches your life somehow.

[G-Unit]

No-one on this forum or any other knows what happened to Madeleine McCann unless s/he is the perpetrator of the crime.  "Doubting" the victims of the crime while propagating many of the myths and misinformation which have been doing the rounds for over eight years ... may be what is considered a 'polite' way of hounding and harassing them.
It is risible to claim you have no opinion ... or perhaps on occasion you would actually find a fact which shone a positive light on the victims of the crime ... rather than the 'doubters' litany of your preference.

I don't know what the 'myths and misinformation' you refer to are (nicely alliterative). I try to provide cites for what I say rather than propagating my own opinions, so how is that 'hounding and harassing' anyone?(more nice alliteration). There's enough people on here attempting to shine a positive light on the McCanns, mainly by giving us their opinions on why the McCanns did or said something which seems strange. As we have no idea what crime has been committed we don't yet know who the victims are, apart from Madeleine of course.

[Mr Gray]

I don't know what the 'myths and misinformation' you refer to are (nicely alliterative). I try to provide cites for what I say rather than propagating my own opinions, so how is that 'hounding and harassing' anyone?(more nice alliteration). There's enough people on here attempting to shine a positive light on the McCanns, mainly by giving us their opinions on why the McCanns did or said something which seems strange. As we have no idea what crime has been committed we don't yet know who the victims are, apart from Madeleine of course.

so basically according to you and Stephen ...we are all suspects until it is proven we are not involved...good job SY have more than a little more sense than you two

[G-Unit]

so basically according to you and Stephen ...we are all suspects until it is proven we are not involved...good job SY have more than a little more sense than you two

I've noticed you keep calling Stephen stupid. I don't hand out insults, but the above statement calls into serious question your high opinion of your intellectual prowess. Neither I nor Stephen has ever said that as far as I know. Good job SY have 'more than a little more sense than you'. There have been suspects in this case but they couldn't be charged due to lack of evidence.

[Mr Gray]

I've noticed you keep calling Stephen stupid. I don't hand out insults, but the above statement calls into serious question your high opinion of your intellectual prowess. Neither I nor Stephen has ever said that as far as I know. Good job SY have 'more than a little more sense than you'. There have been suspects in this case but they couldn't be charged due to lack of evidence.

I think it shows how little understanding of the case both you and Stephen have...the fact that SY have not publicly ruled out alien abduction ...and the fact that the crime is unknown ...does not mean that alien abduction is considered a possibility. It should be obvious...even to you...that if SY have ruled out the parents...which they have told us they have.....then the options as to what happened to Maddie are limited

[G-Unit]

I think it shows how little understanding of the case both you and Stephen have...the fact that SY have not publicly ruled out alien abduction ...and the fact that the crime is unknown ...does not mean that alien abduction is considered a possibility. It should be obvious...even to you...that if SY have ruled out the parents...which they have told us they have.....then the options as to what happened to Maddie are limited

Well, the PJ said they weren't suspects and then questioned them as arguidos. I'm sure SY wouldn't be so devious as to tell us two years ago that the parents weren't suspects and then change their minds. It should be obvious 'even to you' that investigations develop and the police don't always tell us what they really think. It seems somewhat desperate to me to keep clinging to something said by a DCI two years ago who is now retired. His replacement has said........?

[Mr Gray]

Well, the PJ said they weren't suspects and then questioned them as arguidos. I'm sure SY wouldn't be so devious as to tell us two years ago that the parents weren't suspects and then change their minds. It should be obvious 'even to you' that investigations develop and the police don't always tell us what they really think. It seems somewhat desperate to me to keep clinging to something said by a DCI two years ago who is now retired. His replacement has said........?

I'm not placing my belief on that one statement...it's the statement plus the activity of the police since the statement....it is desperation by you to think that some new evidence has come to light ...but never mind tick tock...it took 150 years for Galilleo to be proved right according to one prominent amaral supporter...so only 143 years to go before the mccanns are arrested...