The way I see it, if what the Judge stated in her expansive judgement is true, then Amaral used privileged information which was illegal. Surely all gains attributed to it should therefore be forfeit?
The judge seems to have adopted the principle of "Drs McCann suffered distress as a result of Sr Amaral publishing privileged information which is contrary to Portuguese law. Sr Amaral profited by publishing that privileged information. Balance it up by awarding the profits to Drs McCann".
As a principle I can see nowt wrong with it. Under the circumstances, however, did the judge have the powers to do that* ?
It is strange that if Sr Amaral did breach the law with respect to his position as a public servant that no action has been brought for 8 years.
* as in did she actually have the power under Portuguese law, not what do a load of barrack room lawyers on here think. The judiciary exceeding it's authority causes appeals in England and Wales so as an occurrence it is not unheard of.