why are people who suspect the mccanns attacked?

[slartibartfast]

I have been ignoring the originator of this thread for quite some time.  I have found her posting style aggressive, abusive and on occasion just downright nasty.

Very funny.

[Alfred R Jones]

I have been ignoring the originator of this thread for quite some time.  I have found her posting style aggressive, abusive and on occasion just downright nasty.

It's kind of ironic that an OP bemoaning the attacking behaviour of McCann supporters also includes a direct insult to us supporters, that some of us here are both imbecilic and insane.  The thing is - this OP had to be approved by the Admin of this forum, a decision that I find hard to fathom. 

[jassi]

Very funny.

Irony, even   

[stephen25000]

I think the absence of any logical argument from some who profess to doubt the McCanns is attacked.

But that is quite different from attacking the poster.

Logical arguments ferryman ?

You can't accept them, and we know the reason why.

You are here to defend the mccanns, as your history of posting more than indicates.

P.S. Before you say it, I know you're not paid.

[carlymichelle]

Logical arguments ferryman ?

You can't accept them, and we know the reason why.

You are to defend the mccanns, as your history of posting more than indicates.

P.S. Before you say it, I know you're not paid.

its the same with some other well known mcann supporters they are all passive aggresive imo    they bully otehrs because   people see though the mcanns decit brietta  tried to excuse them by  saying they are drs etc it  doesnt  work

[stephen25000]

its the same with some other well known mcann supporters they are all passive aggresive imo

Indeed they are Carlymichelle, and their tactics are well known.

[Carana]

Logical arguments ferryman ?

You can't accept them, and we know the reason why.

You are here to defend the mccanns, as your history of posting more than indicates.

P.S. Before you say it, I know you're not paid.

As the thread title is currently phrased, is that OT?

[Alfred R Jones]

As the thread title is currently phrased, is that OT?

It seems that a thread bemoaning attacks is now turning into an attack on others.  Nice one Admin.

[carlymichelle]

As the thread title is currently phrased, is that OT?

so what if it s OT? this forum  is so controlled most other forums let  debate etc flow freely mcann supporters dont like that

[stephen25000]

As the thread title is currently phrased, is that OT?

Mere observation Carana and analysis of pro-mccann sites.

[carlymichelle]

Mere observation Carana and analysis of pro-mccann sites.

the  way  i  see things stephen is the mcanns started this whole thing by their sheer neglect of thei children parents have had their children taken into care for way  less  the mcanns  lost any  credibility or sympathy  they think they deserve by leaving 3   precious  little children alone      and leaving maddie to her  fate

[Carana]

so what if it s OT? this forum  is so controlled most other forums let  debate etc flow freely mcann supporters dont like that

Carly, You're not trying to goad, are you?

If and when you debate a point concerning the case, I'll be happy to respond. I may even agree with a point or two, or disagree, depending on what it is and provided that the point in question isn't the same one raised day after day.

[Brietta]

its the same with some other well known mcann supporters they are all passive aggresive imo    they bully otehrs because   people see though the mcanns decit brietta  tried to excuse them by  saying they are drs etc it  doesnt  work

This is another poster I most often choose to ignore, mainly because her posts as well as being ill informed are just too silly for words. 
On this occasion it would be worth while pondering why I am being attacked because I refer to Dr Kate and Dr Gerry McCann by their title on most occasions.

[stephen25000]

This is another poster I most often choose to ignore, mainly because her posts as well as being ill informed are just too silly for words. 
On this occasion it would be worth while pondering why I am being attacked because I refer to Dr Kate and Dr Gerry McCann by their title on most occasions.

Well kate is no longer operating, and if I remember correctly, consultants are called Mr., not doctor.

and of course kate is not on the specialist register either.

[Carana]

Mere observation Carana and analysis of pro-mccann sites.

Would a separate thread "Why is anyone who isn't convinced of the mccannswhatdunnit theory attacked" be a worthwhile exercise? I doubt it - just more work for the mods. I'd have thought it simpler to modify the title.