why are people who suspect the mccanns attacked?

[sadie]

Well kate is no longer operating, and if I remember correctly, consultants are called Mr., not doctor.

and of course kate is not on the specialist register either.

Incorrect stephen.

Physician consultants are called Dr. 

Gerry is a physician Consultant, so is called Dr.



Surgeons, on the other hand, are called Mr.

[stephen25000]

Incorrect stephen.

Physician consultants are called Dr. 

Gerry is a physician Consultant, so is called Dr.



Surgeons, on the other hand, are called Mr.

I'll have to take your word for that.

However, kate healy is not on the specialist register, is she ?

[Mr Gray]

because they attack the mccanns

[carlymichelle]

because they attack the mccanns

the mcanns are adults  they can defend themselves they dont need you to they care none about you 

[G-Unit]

The supporter's of the McCanns have very few facts to work with.

Those who doubt the McCanns have a lot of material to support their case. Their posts are based on many facts.

That's why those who suspect or disbelieve the McCanns are attacked. They post facts which are in the files or taken from videos of interviews. The only way to answer them is either by using opinion, (which is no use as it's subjective) or to attack the credibility of the poster.

[carlymichelle]

The supporter's of the McCanns have very few facts to work with.

Those who doubt the McCanns have a lot of material to support their case. Their posts are based on many facts.

That's why those who suspect or disbelieve the McCanns are attacked. They post facts which are in the files or taken from videos of interviews. The only way to answer them is either by using opinion, (which is no use as it's subjective) or to attack the credibility of the poster.

exactly   so they have nothing left but to attack the poster not the opinion

[Alfred R Jones]

The supporter's of the McCanns have very few facts to work with.

Those who doubt the McCanns have a lot of material to support their case. Their posts are based on many facts.

That's why those who suspect or disbelieve the McCanns are attacked. They post facts which are in the files or taken from videos of interviews. The only way to answer them is either by using opinion, (which is no use as it's subjective) or to attack the credibility of the poster.

So basically you're saying that the McCann doubters have won the argument.

Here's a fact for you - the Met are treating Madeleine's disappearance as a stranger abduction.  I can provide a cite to confirm my statement.   Now provide a fact which proves that they are not.  Off you go.

[G-Unit]

So basically you're saying that the McCann doubters have won the argument.

Here's a fact for you - the Met are treating Madeleine's disappearance as a stranger abduction.  I can provide a cite to confirm my statement.   Now provide a fact which proves that they are not.  Off you go.

Ah ha! Here comes Alfred's fact. Give us your cite then.

[Alfred R Jones]

Ah ha! Here comes Alfred's fact. Give us your cite then.

You know full well that I can provide a cite for my statement.  It was my signature line for long enough.  Now provide me with one fact that proves I am wrong.  It should be easy for you, now off you go.

[G-Unit]

You know full well that I can provide a cite for my statement.  It was my signature line for long enough.  Now provide me with one fact that proves I am wrong.  It should be easy for you, now off you go.

No no no. You offered a cite now give it. (I don't read signature lines)

[Alfred R Jones]

In fact G-Unit, please also provide one fact about Operation Grange which proves that the McCanns are in the frame for their child's disappearance. 

[Alfred R Jones]

No no no. You offered a cite now give it. (I don't read signature lines)

OK, I'll play your game.  Here's one.  Given time I can also supply video footage of him actually uttering these words. 
Dismissing conspiracy theories about Madeleine's parents' involvement, Redwood said he believed the girl's disappearance was the result of "a criminal act by a stranger". http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/apr/25/madeleine-mccann-case-reopen-call

Now, that is a fact, which you can choose to disbelieve but which you are completely unable to disprove.

[Carew]

A belief isn`t a fact, is it?

[G-Unit]

OK, I'll play your game.  Here's one.  Given time I can also supply video footage of him actually uttering these words. 
Dismissing conspiracy theories about Madeleine's parents' involvement, Redwood said he believed the girl's disappearance was the result of "a criminal act by a stranger". http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/apr/25/madeleine-mccann-case-reopen-call

Now, that is a fact, which you can choose to disbelieve but which you are completely unable to disprove.

Your game not mine. That's one fact, well done! I believe Redwood said he 'believed'. That doesn't mean he was right, of course, he was just giving his opinion with nothing to support it ever having been released in the following three years.

[Alfred R Jones]

A belief isn`t a fact, is it?

The fact is that the Met have said they believe Madeleine's disappearance was due to a criminal act by a stranger.  Now, like I said you can choose to disbelieve what the Met have said but you cannot prove that they are investigating any other theory than what they have stated, can you?