Author Topic: why are people who suspect the mccanns attacked?  (Read 54839 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: why are people who suspect the mccanns attacked?
« Reply #180 on: June 16, 2015, 06:56:17 AM »
Kate didn't say they were being updated about the investigation's progress. She didn't say the Met were telling them things in confidence. What she said I have re-posted to remind you. It's all very vague and won't bother the Met or the PJ.


Kate McCann has said she is "really encouraged" by the progress being made in the case of her missing daughter Madeleine.

Kate said she couldn't reveal details of the investigation but said there had been "a lot" of progress in the last six months.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/madeleine-mccann-mum-kate-really-5884879?

It certainly doesn't sound as though they feel they are being investigated themselves which some deluded posters think could be happening

Offline slartibartfast

Re: why are people who suspect the mccanns attacked?
« Reply #181 on: June 16, 2015, 07:15:34 AM »
And? It's not for me to say what that means, but it could mean;

Well obviously I can’t give any investigation details out (coz I don't know any)

 let’s just say we’re really encouraged. There has been a lot of progress in the last six months plus, last year (that's what they said when we asked, anyway)

The co-operation between the UK and the Portuguese seems to be really good (I don't know if it really is, but it seems to be) which is really positive for us (I think SY may have managed to convince the PJ that they're not there just to criticise them) and I can say there is progress being made (did I just say that previously? Oh well, repeat)

Precisely, it's not lying just carefully worded.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: why are people who suspect the mccanns attacked?
« Reply #182 on: June 16, 2015, 07:22:41 AM »
Precisely, it's not lying just carefully worded.

The whole internet anti McCann movement is falling apart...you just can't see it

Offline G-Unit

Re: why are people who suspect the mccanns attacked?
« Reply #183 on: June 16, 2015, 07:33:01 AM »
The whole internet anti McCann movement is falling apart...you just can't see it


If we look at recent fund raising efforts by two of the main players it would appear that those who doubt the McCanns outnumber their supporters by at least two to one.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: why are people who suspect the mccanns attacked?
« Reply #184 on: June 16, 2015, 07:35:13 AM »

If we look at recent fund raising efforts by two of the main players it would appear that those who doubt the McCanns outnumber their supporters by at least two to one.

amaral has about 1000 contributors...from all over the world...doesn't sound like a lot to me

Offline G-Unit

Re: why are people who suspect the mccanns attacked?
« Reply #185 on: June 16, 2015, 07:51:25 AM »
amaral has about 1000 contributors...from all over the world...doesn't sound like a lot to me

It's around twice as many as Kate McCann, as I said. I have no other way of assessing how many people believe the McCanns and how many doubt them. It's not hard evidence but it's an indication. It would perhaps explain why those who doubt them are attacked. There's no point in suing them because they have no money. The police aren't interested in arresting them so 'dossiers' are a waste of time. The only option left is to bully and harass them so they shut up and go away. Of course that obviously isn't working either.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: why are people who suspect the mccanns attacked?
« Reply #186 on: June 16, 2015, 07:52:49 AM »
It's around twice as many as Kate McCann, as I said. I have no other way of assessing how many people believe the McCanns and how many doubt them. It's not hard evidence but it's an indication. It would perhaps explain why those who doubt them are attacked. There's no point in suing them because they have no money. The police aren't interested in arresting them so 'dossiers' are a waste of time. The only option left is to bully and harass them so they shut up and go away. Of course that obviously isn't working either.

I think you need to wake up to reality....don't you see McCann supporters being attacked

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: why are people who suspect the mccanns attacked?
« Reply #187 on: June 16, 2015, 08:04:46 AM »
It's around twice as many as Kate McCann, as I said. I have no other way of assessing how many people believe the McCanns and how many doubt them. It's not hard evidence but it's an indication. It would perhaps explain why those who doubt them are attacked. There's no point in suing them because they have no money. The police aren't interested in arresting them so 'dossiers' are a waste of time. The only option left is to bully and harass them so they shut up and go away. Of course that obviously isn't working either.
How many people support the McCann-controlled Facebook page?  Compare the number of likes and shares a post quoting Kate or Gerry gets versus any of the main sceptic Facebook pages, you will then see who has the greater support. 

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: why are people who suspect the mccanns attacked?
« Reply #188 on: June 16, 2015, 08:13:35 AM »
Oh she did.

She went up to Porto to begin with.

Then when things got too hot, she left Portugal  %£&)**#


So you were there sadie and witnessed all these events ? &%&£(+ &%&£(+ &%&£(+

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: why are people who suspect the mccanns attacked?
« Reply #189 on: June 16, 2015, 08:14:54 AM »
The whole internet anti McCann movement is falling apart...you just can't see it

Now you were talking about delusions ?
 ?>)()<

Offline Brietta

Re: why are people who suspect the mccanns attacked?
« Reply #190 on: June 16, 2015, 08:48:51 AM »
It must surely be shaming at times for those members who are, or have been in any way associated with thoroughly nasty, pointless, distasteful sites whose sole purpose is to target and attack those who doubt or suspect the McCanns.

One such site has been alluded to earlier in the thread and has a title directly related to this forum and "discusses" members past and present from this forum.

Links are easy to find if anyone has the appetite to read such "material."

That no-one is inclined to bring it here is not an indication that it does not exist.

Were I capable of enumerating every site set up with the sole purpose of "doubting" or "suspecting" or to be just downright nasty as far as Madeleine McCann's parents are concerned I would be a very busy little bee indeed.

Only yesterday Stephen was gloating over hateful comments made in a national newspaper which he found edifying but which must have bemused the ordinary reader who might have been expecting to read something which reflected positively on a charity bike ride instead of diatribes about one of the participants.

Some of the comments attached by supporters to the Goncalo Amaral appeal fund reflect some very unbalanced and disturbed opinions indeed.

People who are "suspicious" of Madeleine's parents, many of whom have been indulging themselves in attacks on the Drs McCann for a mind boggling eight years, are asserting it is they who are under attack.

Come on ... you will have to do a bit better than making generalisations ... come up with the specifics of the situation you appear to be claiming.
I think your difficulty may very well be that the alleged "attacks" are figments of fevered imagination and are actually rebuttals which challenge the veracity of many of the 'facts' and 'opinions' promulgated day in and day out by some of the most ill informed people ever given access to a keyboard.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Brietta

Re: why are people who suspect the mccanns attacked?
« Reply #191 on: June 16, 2015, 08:54:24 AM »
The whole internet anti McCann movement is falling apart...you just can't see it

I think it is seen, Davel, hence the desperation of trying to retrieve something from eight years of unrelenting spite and sheer nastiness.
The death knell was the reopening of Madeleine's case, especially in Portugal ... which is why there has been such opposition to it happening, to it continuing and to the thought of a positive conclusion.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Carana

Re: why are people who suspect the mccanns attacked?
« Reply #192 on: June 16, 2015, 08:56:20 AM »

If we look at recent fund raising efforts by two of the main players it would appear that those who doubt the McCanns outnumber their supporters by at least two to one.

Isn't that comparing apples and oranges?

The purpose of the two fund-raising initiatives is totally different.

Offline Lace

Re: why are people who suspect the mccanns attacked?
« Reply #193 on: June 16, 2015, 08:59:53 AM »
Isn't that comparing apples and oranges?

The purpose of the two fund-raising initiatives is totally different.

It is ridiculous to compare the two,   Kate McCann is not raising money for herself it's for a charity,   many people support charities and can't afford to support all of them,  they usually stick to those they have chosen to support.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: why are people who suspect the mccanns attacked?
« Reply #194 on: June 16, 2015, 10:19:19 AM »
Stephen and Carly - it surprises me not one iota that you are both now whining about "biased moderators"

Both of you - grow up.   

The mods here do an excellent job of refereeing, and deserve thanks,

If you actually read what I said earlier in regard to  to what was said last year in appointing new mods last year, and which was abided by, I would have no quibbles.

In my view, moderators should be just that and do the job they accepted, i.e. to moderate.

I have no problem with people having their views, but sometimes bias is inevitable.

So JP, what is wrong with that proposal ?