Were I capable of enumerating every site set up with the sole purpose of "doubting" or "suspecting" or to be just downright nasty as far as Madeleine McCann's parents are concerned I would be a very busy little bee indeed.
Only yesterday Stephen was gloating over hateful comments made in a national newspaper which he found edifying but which must have bemused the ordinary reader who might have been expecting to read something which reflected positively on a charity bike ride instead of diatribes about one of the participants.
Some of the comments attached by supporters to the Goncalo Amaral appeal fund reflect some very unbalanced and disturbed opinions indeed.
People who are "suspicious" of Madeleine's parents, many of whom have been indulging themselves in attacks on the Drs McCann for a mind boggling eight years, are asserting it is they who are under attack.
Come on ... you will have to do a bit better than making generalisations ... come up with the specifics of the situation you appear to be claiming.
I think your difficulty may very well be that the alleged "attacks" are figments of fevered imagination and are actually rebuttals which challenge the veracity of many of the 'facts' and 'opinions' promulgated day in and day out by some of the most ill informed people ever given access to a keyboard.
Please do not " think" that my alleged "attacks" are figments of fevered imagination.
It is an insult............but never mind...........You couch yours in so many words they go unnoticed.
People who have ever posted or or condoned posts like the one below from that appalling site alluded to previously are no better than those they feel "attack" the McCanns.
Is that "specific" enough for you?
(Cue a multitude of blustering excuses roughly based on the Noble Pastime of Defending the McCanns.)
"Too late, Lamberton. And child-rape enthusiasts Wonderfulspam, Cariad and jassi have NOT been banned. Even the FB sewers would have banned pervs like those three. "
