Author Topic: Groundhog Day? What if anything can we agree about?  (Read 35684 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Groundhog Day? What if anything can we agree about?
« Reply #30 on: July 14, 2015, 06:53:45 PM »
I would say it's a fact...in fact I did say it's a fact...I have evidence to back it up but can't be bothered  to present it....tough

That means nothing.

How could you gave evidence ?

You have no connection to the investigation.

Or are you doing another Sadie ?

Offline mercury

Re: Groundhog Day? What if anything can we agree about?
« Reply #31 on: July 14, 2015, 08:09:34 PM »
abduction is way ahead the most probable fate of maddie...fact

no it isnt at all, there is no evidence, and what faults your stanceis there is circumstsntial evidence fordeath. In the apartment

ergo

No evidence of abduction versus cirumstantial evidence for none

No brainer
« Last Edit: July 14, 2015, 08:11:46 PM by mercury »

Offline sadie

Re: Groundhog Day? What if anything can we agree about?
« Reply #32 on: July 15, 2015, 02:33:46 AM »
abduction is way ahead the most probable fate of maddie...fact
Absolutely correct Davel.
 
1)  Parents returning to PT when the [ahem] sceptics were saying that as they were guilty. they wouldn't dare return to PT
 
2)  Parents refusing to drop the search, when guilty folks would quietly slide away from the limelight.
 
3)  Parents pressing for the highly respected SY to take on the case, when all the sceptics [ahem] were saying that Kate and Gerry would fear if SY re-opened the case
 
4)  SY stating that neither the parents nor any of the Tapas group are suspects.

[cont ..]

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Groundhog Day? What if anything can we agree about?
« Reply #33 on: July 15, 2015, 09:49:14 AM »
Absolutely correct Davel.
 
1)  Parents returning to PT when the [ahem] sceptics were saying that as they were guilty. they wouldn't dare return to PT
 
2)  Parents refusing to drop the search, when guilty folks would quietly slide away from the limelight.
 
3)  Parents pressing for the highly respected SY to take on the case, when all the sceptics [ahem] were saying that Kate and Gerry would fear if SY re-opened the case
 
4)  SY stating that neither the parents nor any of the Tapas group are suspects.

[cont ..]

Absolutely not.

The crime is not determined.

People have their beliefs and theories.

You have your pointers, and that is how it stands.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Groundhog Day? What if anything can we agree about?
« Reply #34 on: July 15, 2015, 10:28:35 AM »
I think after three pages of this thread the trend seems to be that a) we can't agree about anything and that b) yes, every day IS indeed Groundhog Day!

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Groundhog Day? What if anything can we agree about?
« Reply #35 on: July 15, 2015, 10:29:43 AM »
I think after three pages of this thread the trend seems to be that a) we can't agree about anything and that b) yes, every day IS indeed Groundhog Day!

I agree with that.  ?{)(**

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Groundhog Day? What if anything can we agree about?
« Reply #36 on: July 15, 2015, 10:32:03 AM »
I agree with that.  ?{)(**
8@??)(  And on that note perhaps we should draw a discreet veil over this thread...?

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Groundhog Day? What if anything can we agree about?
« Reply #37 on: July 15, 2015, 10:49:09 AM »
8@??)(  And on that note perhaps we should draw a discreet veil over this thread...?

Quite possibly Alfred.

I think we have been here before. @)(++(*

Offline sadie

Re: Groundhog Day? What if anything can we agree about?
« Reply #38 on: July 15, 2015, 12:51:46 PM »
Absolutely correct Davel.
 
1)  Parents returning to PT when the [ahem] sceptics were saying that as they were guilty. they wouldn't dare return to PT
 
2)  Parents refusing to drop the search, when guilty folks would quietly slide away from the limelight.
 
3)  Parents pressing for the highly respected SY to take on the case, when all the sceptics [ahem] were saying that Kate and Gerry would fear if SY re-opened the case
 
4)  SY stating that neither the parents nor any of the Tapas group are suspects.

[cont ..]
I see that my other 3 posts on this topic listing a total of 17 pointers/ clues to Madeleine being abducted have been wiped.  All of the points being facts.

I wonder why? &%+((£


Seems peeps on here can speculate in any way that The Mccanns dunnit.  But facts indicating that there was an abduction are wiped.

I wonder why? &%+((£



John, Angelo???

Offline John

Re: Groundhog Day? What if anything can we agree about?
« Reply #39 on: July 15, 2015, 02:16:25 PM »
I see that my other 3 posts on this topic listing a total of 17 pointers/ clues to Madeleine being abducted have been wiped.  All of the points being facts.

I wonder why? &%+((£


Seems peeps on here can speculate in any way that The Mccanns dunnit.  But facts indicating that there was an abduction are wiped.

I wonder why? &%+((£



John, Angelo???

We deal with established facts and evidence here Sadie.   Your posts and those which followed were removed as the little girls in Morocco and in Belgium were identified as not being Madeleine McCann.
« Last Edit: July 16, 2015, 12:37:10 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Groundhog Day? What if anything can we agree about?
« Reply #40 on: July 15, 2015, 02:20:15 PM »
We deal with established facts and evidence here Sadie.   Your posts were removed as the little girls in Morocco and in Amsterdam were identified as not being Madeleine McCann.

exactly john   and  those little girls  deserve their privacy and should not speaked about imo  bouchka was  very traumatised by people accusing her of being maddie   i  remember  also the little girls photo  at the football is still shared on FB sometimes it needs to stop imo
« Last Edit: July 15, 2015, 02:22:46 PM by carlymichelle »

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Groundhog Day? What if anything can we agree about?
« Reply #41 on: July 15, 2015, 02:32:20 PM »
I think after three pages of this thread the trend seems to be that a) we can't agree about anything and that b) yes, every day IS indeed Groundhog Day!
are we all agreed on that

Offline Brietta

Re: Groundhog Day? What if anything can we agree about?
« Reply #42 on: July 15, 2015, 07:36:14 PM »
We deal with established facts and evidence here Sadie.   Your posts and those which followed were removed as the little girls in Morocco and in Amsterdam were identified as not being Madeleine McCann.

All I have ever seen dismissing the sighting of the little girl outside the bank in Amsterdam (MOLENBEEK ST JOHN in Brussels) as not being Madeleine was a statement to from the child's father that she was his daughter and not Madeleine.

Has anyone seen any confirmation from an official source that the child was was not Madeleine? 

We know that the little girl in New Zealand with a remarkable likeness to Madeleine down to a similar eye defect was officially eliminated from the inquiry.

Has anyone seen any confirmation from an official source that the child in Amsterdam (MOLENBEEK ST JOHN in Brussels) was was not Madeleine? 


Quote from Sadie
John got it wrong Brietta and he hasn't yet changed his mistake..  It was NOT in Amsterdam that the bank sighting was but in MOLENBEEK ST JOHN in Brussels, which as we all kow is in Belgium.
« Last Edit: July 16, 2015, 10:35:29 AM by Brietta »
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Benice

Re: Groundhog Day? What if anything can we agree about?
« Reply #43 on: July 16, 2015, 12:10:57 AM »
Before this thread finishes, may I suggest that there is one thing that we might all agree on, and that is that Portuguese law is so different, so convoluted and so alien to us that we have all had difficulty at times in understanding what the hell was going on? 

Personally if it wasn't for the explanations by a couple of posters (from both sides) I would still be completely confuddled.

Also if the Portuguese are about to change/update/clarify (whatever) their legal system - especially if it means that things don't drag on for years  - then that is an extremely good idea.

Can we at least agree on that?  (fingers crossed) 
The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal