With thanks to posters for their assistance.
This was indeed the tabloid information to which I referred in my initial post.
quote ... All I have ever seen dismissing the sighting of the little girl outside the bank in
Amsterdam (MOLENBEEK ST JOHN in Brussels) as not being Madeleine was a statement to from the child's father that she was his daughter and not Madeleine. end quote
It does not address the question I asked which was if
official confirmation had been released, and as we all know too well, tabloids are useful reference points but when it comes to being an official source, I am afraid they do not quite cut the mustard.
Did the Belgium police accept this man's word without further diligences being carried out? More was needed by our antipodean cousins than a father's word and possibly a birth certificate ...
**snip
Even Kate and Gerry McCann could not tell from CCTV footage whether the girl was their long-lost child. Previously they have always known immediately it was not her.
But now
Belgian police have said a man has come forward
to say the girl is his daughter and that she was out with her nanny.
Lieve Pellens, spokeswoman for the Belgian federal prosecutor's office, said: 'He saw this picture and obviously for him it was very easy recognising the girl accompanied by a woman in a veil.
'It's her nanny - she is a young Moroccan woman who is qualified to look after children and works in a care centre.'
The McCanns had been treating the sighting as a priority and the confirmation it is not Madeleine will bring fresh heartache for the couple.
Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1043759/Fresh-heartache-McCanns-police-say-Belgian-sighting-NOT-Madeleine.html#ixzz3g2tDEVWY