SY Crimewatch Smithman Efits

[Carana]

Not sure of the relevance to my post though Carana. Do you think it's credible that SY, at one point, believed there were two almost identical men carrying an uncovered child around PDL on the 3rd ?

I have no idea what the Met may have thought. I would hope that once they interviewed the person they believe could have been Tannerman, they'd have also checked if he could also have been Smithman - not impossible if Tannerman aka likely Crècheman had some reason to stop off somewhere en route.

As the appeal was to concentrate on the later timeframe and Smithman, the two are presumably not the same unless Crècheman had said that he was also there and the Met have a reason to doubt it and are asking for corroboration.

In any case, just because there were two sightings of someone carrying a chid, it doesn't mean that either sighting is correct. Whoever took her out (assuming she didn't walk out by herself) could also be someone who no one happened to see, possibly going in a different direction.

[pegasus]

(snip) ... just because there were two sightings of someone carrying a chid, it doesn't mean that either sighting is correct...(snip)

Agreed.

[Alfred R Jones]

Tell me Alfie how were SY going to ditch Tannerman and concentrate on their main suspect without  having to take legal action  against Tanner ?

What on EARTH are you on about?!  Why would they have to take legal action against Tanner?

[faithlilly]

Agreed.

So you don't feel it is rather a coincidence that both children was seen with no shoes, socks or slippers ( just a Madeleine would have been seen ) and wearing pyjamas almost identical to the pyjamas Madeleine was wearing ?

[faithlilly]

What on EARTH are you on about?!  Why would they have to take legal action against Tanner?

Well she was either lying or she actually saw someone but for SY to actually believe in Crechman they would have to have been stupid enough to believe to almost identical men were seen wearing identical clothes to Madeleine on the 3rd.  And there's one thing SY is not and that's stupid.

[pegasus]

Well she was either lying or she actually saw someone...

She actually saw someone. See the cutting edge documentary - her description of which side of the road the chat was, the TV football, the sighting, all 100% plausible, I have never seen a more honest witness.

[pegasus]

... but for SY to actually believe in Crechman they would have to have been stupid enough to believe to almost identical men were seen wearing identical clothes to Madeleine on the 3rd.  And there's one thing SY is not and that's stupid.

The child seen by JT had long pyjama legs with bands at the leg ends that look like turn-ups (completely different to the missing child's pyjamas with short legs and no bands/turn-ups).

The child seen by the irish group had long sleeves (completely different to the missing child's very short sleeves).

In neither sighting did the child clothes match the missing girl's clothes.

[faithlilly]

She actually saw someone. See the cutting edge documentary - her description of which side of the road the chat was, the TV football, the sighting, all 100% plausible, I have never seen a more honest witness.

With respect IYO Pegasus.

[Alfred R Jones]

She actually saw someone. See the cutting edge documentary - her description of which side of the road the chat was, the TV football, the sighting, all 100% plausible, I have never seen a more honest witness.

[faithlilly]

The child seen by JT had long pyjama legs with bands at the leg ends that look like turn-ups (completely different to the missing child's pyjamas with short legs and no bands/turn-ups).

The child seen by the irish group had long sleeves (completely different to the missing child's very short sleeves).

In neither sighting did the child clothes match the missing girl's clothes.

 
I think the words used are 'possibly turn-ups'. Madeleine's pyjamas had a small frill at the end of the legs which Malay have been what Tanner was describing.

[Brietta]

Had JT not seen Tannerman, would Smithman & Crecheman ever have entered the equation?

Only if it had been necessary ... and certainly not as described.

[Brietta]

I think the words used are 'possibly turn-ups'. Madeleine's pyjamas had a small frill at the end of the legs which Malay have been what Tanner was describing.

Am I right in thinking the sketch artist was American ... I seem to recall that Jane was not entirely happy with some aspects of the sketch ... can't remember if it was said in her rog. or reported in a newspaper.

[misty]

Am I right in thinking the sketch artist was American ... I seem to recall that Jane was not entirely happy with some aspects of the sketch ... can't remember if it was said in her rog. or reported in a newspaper.

Melissa Little?

[Brietta]

Melissa Little?

I think you are correct, Misty.  For some obscure reason I had it in my head it was an FBI artist who produced the drawing. I've just Googled and I see Melissa contributed more than one.

[mercury]

Am I right in thinking the sketch artist was American ... I seem to recall that Jane was not entirely happy with some aspects of the sketch ... can't remember if it was said in her rog. or reported in a newspaper.

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/POWERPOINT.htm

All your answers here, Gerry McCann to the police, JT was not happy wth the face with a nose even though she later said she never saw a face, so Meliss blanked the nose