SY Crimewatch Smithman Efits

[Robittybob1]

Tanner told the police artist she was not happy with the face so the artist removed it, why would she put it in in the first place if not directed??

Redwood changed the timelne obviously because of the smith sighting which was deemed by him as inportant if not more than the tannerman sighting (the one the mccanns hushed up more or less, as they forever and a day promoted tanners sightng over the smith one which was just as probable if not more as madeleine being taken away, after all all tanner saw was a pair of feet, no hair colour no sex , no top, no age though someone massaged her sighting a few days later)

The mccanns did the police job for them? Well, what was the result? zero again
Maybe if they cooperated in the first place and throughout thngs might be dfferent today, as it hapoens they took control as much as they could from day one, sorry, hour one by going aganst police advice and bringing in the worlds media and from then on its history

Was that the McCanns or the Paynes that brought in the media?

[G-Unit]

The Smith e-fits should have been publicised immediately in the Algarve in an attempt to exclude Smithman from the investigation.

Most parents would have been in the Algarve themselves putting up posters of all those they had commissioned pictures of. I could never see the point of releasing them to UK newspapers and ignoring the place where the events occurred.

[Angelo222]

You still are not getting the point about how outrageous it is that the victims of a crime have had to do the police job for them.

Could it perhaps have something to do with the fact that surprisingly and oddly, the parents were less than helpful to the inquiry this having been borne out by Kate McCanns less than enthusiastic comments about the Portuguese police in her book? 

Is it normal for the parents of a 'disappeared under suspicious circumstances' child to thwart the police investigation and refuse to answer ALL their questions?

A one word response will suffice.

[Brietta]

Could it perhaps have something to do with the fact that surprisingly and oddly, the parents were less than helpful to the inquiry this having been borne out by Kate McCanns less than enthusiastic comments about the Portuguese police in her book? 

Is it normal for the parents of a 'disappeared under suspicious circumstances' child to thwart the police investigation and refuse to answer ALL their questions?

A one word response will suffice.

At that stage of the investigation the police were intent on pinning the disappearance of the child on the child's mother.  Much the same tactic had already 'solved' the case of another missing child.

Quote
Several similarities between the cases—both girls vanished without trace within 7 miles (11 km) and less than three years of each other, in both cases officers failed to secure the crime scene, both mothers mounted campaigns to find their daughters and both women were accused of involvement—prompted Joana's family to appeal in 2008 for police to investigate whether there was a link between the disappearances.[5]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Joana_Cipriano

There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that Kate McCann took precisely the correct lawful course of action in implementing her right to silence ... and I rather suspect you know that she did particularly as she had just been subjected to a round of eleven hours of police interrogation.

[Robittybob1]

Imagine there was a portuguese tourist, who does not understand english, walking down that section of Rua Escola and Travessa Das Escadhinas at about 10pm carrying his sleeping daughter.

Imagine he reads all the portuguese language pages on the official MF site, and all the portuguese pages on the SY site. Show me the page where he will read the street names and his own description so that he comes forward. And if he turns on the television, might he see the portuguese language translation of Crimewatch? Unfortunately not, because when the portuguese broadcasters tried, the BBC for legal reasons refused permission. So how exactly is this man supposed to know SY want to contact him? Learn english so he can read the appeals? Become a psychic? Guess?

Have you ever considered SY knows who Smithman is and is waiting for him to come forward.

[Robittybob1]

And yet they were both wrong as JT was utterly vindicated by the Met.  She described accurately what she saw and when she saw it, the only problem was it wasn't the abductor she saw,  but according to the Met it was a man carrying his own sleeping child.  She wasn't to know that at the time, but in all other respects she was correct.

And I think SY is wrong as well.  IMO it was a woman carrying a deceased child.

[Robittybob1]

Or it could be possible SY were stupid enough to believed that two separate men, almost identical in height, build and clothes were floating around town on the 3rd carrying almost identical children sporting no shoes or cover on a cold evening........no I  doubt it as well.

It wouldn't be so difficult if they were husband and wife, the wife could wear his clothes to make it appear she is a man and that the "two men" are dressed similarly.

[Robittybob1]

She actually saw someone. See the cutting edge documentary - her description of which side of the road the chat was, the TV football, the sighting, all 100% plausible, I have never seen a more honest witness.

Never a truer word spoken.

[ferryman]

Could it perhaps have something to do with the fact that surprisingly and oddly, the parents were less than helpful to the inquiry this having been borne out by Kate McCanns less than enthusiastic comments about the Portuguese police in her book? 

Is it normal for the parents of a 'disappeared under suspicious circumstances' child to thwart the police investigation and refuse to answer ALL their questions?

A one word response will suffice.

It is quite normal for anyone, intuitive enough to perceive that they are being set up, to withdraw cooperation.

Downright silly to do otherwise.

[John]

It is quite normal for anyone, intuitive enough to perceive that they are being set up, to withdraw cooperation.

Downright silly to do otherwise.

Setup?

[Robittybob1]

Setup?

Saying the cuddle cat had been alerted to by the cadaver dog Eddie was definitely a setup. 

[ferryman]

Setup?

Is it true that you were thinking of putting up Madeleine for adoption?

Wasn't that one of the questions?

Didn't they state (without showing the McCanns the report) that Madeleine's DNA had been found in the Renault Scenic?

Was that incompetent?

Or corrupt?

And yes (to the post above)

[Robittybob1]

Forcing or trying for a confession through lies would constitute a setup IMO.  Luckily Kate had sufficient conviction in her own innocence to resist confessing.

[pegasus]

And yet they were both wrong as JT was utterly vindicated by the Met.  She described accurately what she saw and when she saw it, the only problem was it wasn't the abductor she saw,  but according to the Met it was a man carrying his own sleeping child.  She wasn't to know that at the time, but in all other respects she was correct.

Agreed Alfie.
To me it was obvious long before Mr Redwood's "revelation", that JT's account is 100% veracious and describes an innocent father and child.

The pyjamas worn by the 2-yr old as shown by Redwood in photo would certainly extend below the knees even in the horizontal carrying position with knees bent. This verifies the accuracy of JT's account. The elasticated bands which resemble turn-ups are another confirmer.

[John]

Is it true that you were thinking of putting up Madeleine for adoption?

Wasn't that one of the questions?

Didn't they state (without showing the McCanns the report) that Madeleine's DNA had been found in the Renault Scenic?

Was that incompetent?

Or corrupt?

And yes (to the post above)

That's what police do ferryman, they ask questions and suggest answers.