Did Eddie and Keela work as a team prior to the Madeleine McCann case?

[mercury]

Your post didn't make any sense....please don't quote religion at me I have a wonderful riposte

It makes total sense for those that understand sense at least

Not a bible basher in the slightest, I could have quoted Yeats or Shakespeare wth the same message, but Matt came to mind  instantly as it was suitably apt

[Mr Gray]

It makes total sense for those that understand sense at least

Not a bible basher in the slightest, I could have quoted Yeats or Shakespeare wth the same message, but Matt came to mind  instantly as it was suitably apt

No evidential reliability ales perfect sense.....plus in his rogatory Grime was asked on two occasions if the alerts confirmed the presence of cadaver odour... He did not answer the questions

[slartibartfast]

It makes total sense for those that understand sense at least

Not a bible basher in the slightest, I could have quoted Yeats or Shakespeare wth the same message, but Matt came to mind  instantly as it was suitably apt

Very good.

[Mr Gray]

Very good.

I think it's very poor so we will have to agree to disagree

[mercury]

No evidential reliability ales perfect sense.....plus in his rogatory Grime was asked on two occasions if the alerts confirmed the presence of cadaver odour... He did not answer the questions

You are moving the goalposts, not interested

[mercury]

Very good.

Ta Slarti

[Mr Gray]

You are moving the goalposts, not interested

Good... Perhaps in that case it would be better if you did not comment on my posts in derogatory terms
The alerts are not confirmed and as such are basically of no use... 

[ferryman]

These are examples relating to the most important member of the duo doggy team, not a full biographical profile of the history of both dogs' employment. Keela was much younger than Eddie so Eddie will have worked without her up until she was "approved". And Im not sure to what you are referring with "whichever version" of Grime's profile

New Mexico, U.S.A.
A witness reported having seen two men walk off into brush land carrying a
spade and a corpse. The area was searched with the EVRD with no
indications being forthcoming. Other assets were utilised and the body was
found: buried at a depth of 8 feet, under the water table, 3 feet of cement and
5 feet of earth replaced on top the corpse that was wrapped in cling film.
There being no scent available to the dog to receive there was no forthcoming

A deployment outside the UK?

No names mentioned?

Why is that?

[G-Unit]

I get it but you don't it seems....no evidential reliability is 100% clear...

If Eddie hadn't alerted at all, what would that have meant?

[ferryman]

If Eddie hadn't alerted at all, what would that have meant?

Exactly the same as it did mean with an alert.

Zilch ....

[Mr Gray]

If Eddie hadn't alerted at all, what would that have meant?

It seems he didn't alert at first.... It is not the alerts that are important it's what is found at the alert sites
Posters just don't seem to understand that

[mercury]

Good... Perhaps in that case it would be better if you did not comment on my posts in derogatory terms
The alerts are not confirmed and as such are basically of no use...

My first post offended you because I tried to explain to you how the alerts are evidence and saying  now do you get it? because its not rocket science but you seem to have some difficulty with the basic issue.... a paltry example in any case when compared to some of the things you come out with!

I have never said the cadaver dog alerts were confirmed so why you felt the need to type that to me is anyone's guess...as for being of no use, well that's a matter of opinion, they are of use, Mark Harrison stated they are uncorroborated indications they might not be of use in a court, but who is talking court? The alerts are in general valid cause for justifiable suspicion of death ...cadaver dogs are used for this very reason and not to go find evidence of someone who forgot to brush their teeth!

Google circumstantial evidence and swot up on that...these are the facts, not my opinions

[Mr Gray]

My first post offended you because I tried to explain to you how the alerts are evidence and saying  now do you get it? because its not rocket science but you seem to have some difficulty with the basic issue.... a paltry example in any case when compared to some of the things you come out with!

I have never said the cadaver dog alerts were confirmed so why you felt the need to type that to me is anyone's guess...as for being of no use, well that's a matter of opinion, they are of use, Mark Harrison stated they are uncorroborated indications they might not be of use in a court, but who is talking court? The alerts are in general valid cause for justifiable suspicion of death ...cadaver dogs are used for this very reason and not to go find evidence of someone who forgot to brush their teeth!

Google circumstantial evidence and swot up on that...these are the facts, not my opinions

the alerts are not evidence according to Grime

[mercury]

New Mexico, U.S.A.
A witness reported having seen two men walk off into brush land carrying a
spade and a corpse. The area was searched with the EVRD with no
indications being forthcoming. Other assets were utilised and the body was
found: buried at a depth of 8 feet, under the water table, 3 feet of cement and
5 feet of earth replaced on top the corpse that was wrapped in cling film.
There being no scent available to the dog to receive there was no forthcoming

A deployment outside the UK?

No names mentioned?

Why is that?

I've never worked with Mr Grime so have no idea what that case is, what you asking me for? I'm sure a very thorough and painstaking search via Google might yield some result and I don't have to ask you why you are asking in the first place,  it's so bleedin obvious and predictable, so the better post you could have made would have been something along of the lines of Mr Grime has lied again in his cv, no?

[G-Unit]

Exactly the same as it did mean with an alert.

Zilch ....

No alert means Eddie found no trace of the scent he was trained to find. When he alerted it was because he did find the scent he was trained to find. There's a big difference.