Official Find Madeleine Campaign site on Facebook block non supporters!

[G-Unit]

So n your view the abductor is not to blame

If there was an abductor he/she is obviously to blame for what they did. They must have been well pleased with how easy it was made for them too.

[Mr Gray]

If there was an abductor he/she is obviously to blame for what they did. They must have been well pleased with how easy it was made for them too.

A fair enough response

[Brietta]

Own goal.

All that this has revealed, is who is behind the Facebook Page.

Even you can see that.

I suppose you have heard of a "Pyrrhic victory".  I believe we have just witnessed one.

There can be no justification for bombarding a site set up with the best of intentions on behalf of a missing child. 

There can be no justification in the failed attempt to pit the families of two children, both of whom were stolen when they were little more than babies, at each others throats.

[Brietta]

What most people will see, once they have examined the facts, is that this as always is all about the mccanns.

Not Madeleine.

So it helps Madeleine McCann to interfere with the search for her in what way?

[stephen25000]

I suppose you have heard of a "Pyrrhic victory".  I believe we have just witnessed one.

There can be no justification for bombarding a site set up with the best of intentions on behalf of a missing child. 

There can be no justification in the failed attempt to pit the families of two children, both of whom were stolen when they were little more than babies, at each others throats.

It is not known what happened to Ben, anymore than this case shows any sign of resolution.

All that was revealed at the weekend, was the power behind the throne of the Facebook Page, for those that had any doubts, and by the way that didn't include me.

The self-centred nature of the mccanns, is now even more obvious than before.

[stephen25000]

So it helps Madeleine McCann to interfere with the search for her in what way?

This is nothing to do with Madeleine, it's all about the mccanns, as it always was.

[Brietta]

What a load of rollocks.

All this backlash from the mccanns, and it is the mccanns, seems to rather nicely coincide with the start of the appeal, does it not.   %£&)**# %£&)**# %£&)**#

Are you saying it was the Drs McCann who hate bombed Madeleine's twitter tag?  I think you may be placing more importance on Mr Amaral's appeal than it merits ... it is recognised worldwide that he lost the libel trial ... and that is what matters.

[Brietta]

It is not known what happened to Ben, anymore than this case shows any sign of resolution.

All that was revealed at the weekend, was the power behind the throne of the Facebook Page, for those that had any doubts, and by the way that didn't include me.

The self-centred nature of the mccanns, is now even more obvious than before.

Terribly self centred of Madeleine McCann's parents to want her back is it not?  Using social media to promote her cause and that of others is selfish in the extreme??

Do you ever read your posts before submitting them?

[stephen25000]

Terribly self centred of Madeleine McCann's parents to want her back is it not?  Using social media to promote her cause and that of others is selfish in the extreme??

Do you ever read your posts before submitting them?

Back from where brietta ?

La-la land ?

........and yes I do, in answer to your question.

It is a pity you don't read mine thoroughly, and then you might comprehend them.

[Brietta]

This is nothing to do with Madeleine, it's all about the mccanns, as it always was.

Oh? the Official Find Madeleine # is nothing to do with Madeleine McCann. Wonder why along with thousands of others I thought that was exactly what it was all about?

The clue may be in the name.

[Brietta]

Back from where brietta ?

La-la land ?

........and yes I do, in answer to your question.

It is a pity you don't read mine thoroughly, and then you might comprehend them.

The thing is Stephen, your recourse to ad hominem attack reveals that you either have nothing of substance to say or you cannot counter the argument being made.

If the intention was not to damage Madeleine's cause ... what prompted people to send horrible tweets to her #?

[stephen25000]

Are you saying it was the Drs McCann who hate bombed Madeleine's twitter tag?  I think you may be placing more importance on Mr Amaral's appeal than it merits ... it is recognised worldwide that he lost the libel trial ... and that is what matters.

Is it known who did the twitter comments ?

As to drs. mccann.......................

As to the 'libel' trial brietta, did it say libel trial in the court documents ???

and can you remind me of two points ?

1. How much money have they received from Amaral ?

2. How many points they failed to prove in Court ?

[stephen25000]

The thing is Stephen, your recourse to ad hominem attack reveals that you either have nothing of substance to say or you cannot counter the argument being made.

If the intention was not to damage Madeleine's cause ... what prompted people to send horrible tweets to her #?

How pathetic and so predictable.

The mccann supporter instruction package in operation to try and denigrate a poster.

Oh by the way, how exactly can Madeleine receive tweets ?

[stephen25000]

Have a read brietta.


https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10153734562779162&id=6149699161

[jassi]

Have a read brietta.


https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10153734562779162&id=6149699161

Mmm   Not very sympathetic or supportive, are they.