Gonçalo Amaral Legal Defence fund to be closed on 28 October 2015

[misty]

  I've not seen this before, how funny and how desperate, but I hear it worked!  All proceeds from the new Take That and Olly Murs singles are going straight to the 'Poor Portuguese Bent Ex-Cop Retirement Fund'!

But it does make you wonder how many rich/famous people have been approached in the preceding years to contribute to the begging bowl. No surprise PJGA are so reluctant to be transparent with their accounts.

[Alfred R Jones]

But it does make you wonder how many rich/famous people have been approached in the preceding years to contribute to the begging bowl. No surprise PJGA are so reluctant to be transparent with their accounts.

I think if they'd been successful in their appeal to the rich and famous we'd never be hearing the end of it, quite frankly.

[faithlilly]

In Benice's absence, here's a screenshot.

Not misty I meant a reputable cite, not another supporter's fetid imaginings.

[Alfred R Jones]

Not misty I meant a reputable cite, not another supporter's fetid imaginings.

Could you once and for all let us have a list of all the sources that you consider reputable?  That will save us all a lot of time and bother. 

[misty]

Not misty I meant a reputable cite, not another supporter's fetid imaginings.

Screenshots suddenly not good enough as proof?

[faithlilly]

Screenshots suddenly not good enough as proof?

It would depend what the screenshot is of musty.

[mercury]

But it does make you wonder how many rich/famous people have been approached in the preceding years to contribute to the begging bowl. No surprise PJGA are so reluctant to be transparent with their accounts.

How is it different to the mccanns begging bowl? Of 8 years? Plus and especially when theyve had many millions more than the begging bowl

In many ways it is far more transparent and moral....Amarals fund is for monies to defend hmself (one aim and a limit on what was needed)  whilst being straightjacketed by the mccanns, and reading that facebook entry shocked me when reading Kate Mccann wanted Amaral to divorce so she could benefit wtf??, the Mccanns fund was alledgedly to look for Madeleine but not much of it was spent on that was it? And their fund has not been transparent.

I suggest you put behind you your prejudice and hatred of the man, it may leave you open to a clearer mind
If you cant see this IS a david and goliath situation, well, thats that then

[stephen25000]

How is it different to the mccanns begging bowl? Of 8 years? Plus and especially when theyve had many millions more than the begging bowl

In many ways it is far more transparent and moral....Amarals fund is for monies to defend hmself (one aim and a limit on what was needed)  whilst being straightjacketed by the mccanns, and reading that facebook entry shocked me when reading Kate Mccann wanted Amaral to divorce so she could benefit wtf??, the Mccanns fund was alledgedly to look for Madeleine but not much of it was spent on that was it? And their fund has not been transparent.

I suggest you put behind you your prejudice and hatred of the man, it may leave you open to a clearer mind
If you cant see this IS a david and goliath situation, well, thats that then

Perhaps one of the mccanns supporters would care to remind us of how much of the fund was spent on 'searching' ?

[Mr Gray]

Perhaps one of the mccanns supporters would care to remind us of how much of the fund was spent on 'searching' ?

perhaps mccan supporters don't give a toss what you think

[stephen25000]

perhaps mccan supporters don't give a toss what you think

Well they shouldn't reply to my posts. *&*%£

[mercury]

Perhaps one of the mccanns supporters would care to remind us of how much of the fund was spent on 'searching' ?

They dont care

Gerry Mccann stated on national tv that the "vast majority" of the millions was spent "directly on search fees"

Now that WAS a lie

[stephen25000]

They dont care

Gerry Mccann stated in national tv that ghe "vast majority" if the millions was spent "directly on search fees"

Now that WAS a lie

Absolutely blatant.

[mercury]

Absolutely blatant.

And which was in the public domain which makes it really brazen...
Which makes you wonder what else they lied about....but you must be an evil troll to wonder instead of just believing  i suppose lol

[mercury]

Well they shouldn't reply to my posts. *&*%£

Exactly, or make posts on facebook officially saying people who criticise them are as irritating as piles...its still there lol

[misty]

It would depend what the screenshot is of musty.

 Screenshots of Wayback Machine are OK but tweets aren't, is that about the sum of it?