Author Topic: Buddy  (Read 31882 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew Wyse

Re: Buddy
« Reply #15 on: September 27, 2012, 06:20:50 PM »
John I try to refain from mentioning anyone, including your good self. It has to interest in me personally, and Neil comes into the same bracket. It does not matter about past history to me. I am sure that we all have skeletons in the cupboard. [Well you lot not me].
Shona knows my views, and I am forever grateful smhe has kept her council, as it was a private thing between us.
I am sure that Neil feels as hard done by as you John, I have no comment at all on either case.


Best stay out of it buddy.    I have a feeling the repercussions are going to be far reaching.
Most people suspect the truth but few are able to admit it.

Offline buddy

Re: Buddy
« Reply #16 on: September 27, 2012, 06:24:31 PM »
John I try to refain from mentioning anyone, including your good self. It has to interest in me personally, and Neil comes into the same bracket. It does not matter about past history to me. I am sure that we all have skeletons in the cupboard. [Well you lot not me].
Shona knows my views, and I am forever grateful smhe has kept her council, as it was a private thing between us.
I am sure that Neil feels as hard done by as you John, I have no comment at all on either case.


Best stay out of it buddy.    I have a feeling the repercussions are going to be far reaching.


I have said nothing wrong, so choose to remain for the time being. Thanyou for your warning though.
« Last Edit: September 27, 2012, 06:40:47 PM by John »

Offline John

Re: Buddy
« Reply #17 on: September 27, 2012, 06:40:21 PM »
John I try to refain from mentioning anyone, including your good self. It has to interest in me personally, and Neil comes into the same bracket. It does not matter about past history to me. I am sure that we all have skeletons in the cupboard. [Well you lot not me].
Shona knows my views, and I am forever grateful she has kept her council, as it was a private thing between us.
I am sure that Neil feels as hard done by as you John, I have no comment at all on either case.

Quite right too buddy but Bellis and I have unfinished business.  He and his side kick Hall are in breach of a Court Order under Section 44 of The Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999.  As a barrister he will know what the consequences will be for him not to mention the embarrassment such conduct will attract from among his peers.  His job is to practice Law, not to break it.
« Last Edit: September 27, 2012, 06:54:05 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline abs

Re: Buddy
« Reply #18 on: September 27, 2012, 06:53:30 PM »
Quote
Yes Bob has always been the perfect gentleman, it's you , you randy b....r @)(++(*.I do worry about the blue forum, as it is nose diving at the mo. It has been taken down  by a couple of posters, and that is sad.
I don't suppose I will be missed though, as I no nothing about knitting. My mum was a great knitter though.
Did me a pair of swimming trunks once. OK when you was in the water, but my nuts were on view when I got out.
The girls wern't to impressed, and the wool irritatated my... well you know. f..king things used to drag me to the bottom. Ended up with my cousins underpants, and they wern't speedo either. I think this is why I am a damaged person.

LOOOOOL, too funny! Welcome, Buddy!!!! And Bob!!! Buddy and Bob, hmmm.  @)(++(*

Have to share an embarrassing bathing suit incident too! Was on my way home from work and came by a public swimming pool. I was tempted to take a quick swim, but I had no bathing gear with me, but thought, what the heck, you can rent a bathing suit.
So I did.... A dark blue, elastic thing with not so much elasticity left in it from so many washes. I wasn't thrilled about it, but it fit OK.
Well, it did as long as it was dry. When I got in the water and started swimming. The bathing suit got terribly LOOONG and I could feel the water stretching it after my butt. Wobble, wobble, nasty feeling!! It turned out being a VERY short swim, got out of the pool, and that was even worse! The part of it which was supposed to cling to your groin area was hanging down around my knees with water splashing to the ground. I casually RAN to the showers!!  8)><(

Offline buddy

Re: Buddy
« Reply #19 on: September 27, 2012, 06:54:32 PM »
John I try to refain from mentioning anyone, including your good self. It has to interest in me personally, and Neil comes into the same bracket. It does not matter about past history to me. I am sure that we all have skeletons in the cupboard. [Well you lot not me].
Shona knows my views, and I am forever grateful she has kept her council, as it was a private thing between us.
I am sure that Neil feels as hard done by as you John, I have no comment at all on either case.

Quite right too buddy but Bellis and I have unfinished business.
Can I politely request that you it do out of the limelitght John. I have no doubt that you feel agrieved, but do not think that washing dirty washing on a public forum is the way to go.
To be fair I have only read what is available on the web, but you feel strongly enough to carry it further. If you are innocent John I wish you well, as I say my knowledge on you case is very limited, so could not possibly comment, and will not do so.
John you must proceed as you feel fit, but sometimes it is best to roll over, and sigh.

Offline buddy

Re: Buddy
« Reply #20 on: September 27, 2012, 07:04:06 PM »
Funny as ever ABS. I miss your posts. I wonder if I should relate the story of my crutchless overalls. Hmm.
And I thought the women were looking at me for my looks, not because my nuts were hanging out of my kecks.
Tried walking funny but my nuts had a mind of their own. Bit like when I farted and followed though, but that is another story, but equally as messy.

Offline John

Re: Buddy
« Reply #21 on: September 27, 2012, 07:30:14 PM »
John I try to refain from mentioning anyone, including your good self. It has to interest in me personally, and Neil comes into the same bracket. It does not matter about past history to me. I am sure that we all have skeletons in the cupboard. [Well you lot not me].
Shona knows my views, and I am forever grateful she has kept her council, as it was a private thing between us.
I am sure that Neil feels as hard done by as you John, I have no comment at all on either case.

Quite right too buddy but Bellis and I have unfinished business.
Can I politely request that you it do out of the limelitght John. I have no doubt that you feel agrieved, but do not think that washing dirty washing on a public forum is the way to go.
To be fair I have only read what is available on the web, but you feel strongly enough to carry it further. If you are innocent John I wish you well, as I say my knowledge on you case is very limited, so could not possibly comment, and will not do so.
John you must proceed as you feel fit, but sometimes it is best to roll over, and sigh.

I will take that on board buddy but they are both on notice. 
« Last Edit: September 27, 2012, 07:38:27 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline abs

Re: Buddy
« Reply #22 on: September 27, 2012, 07:38:37 PM »
Funny as ever ABS. I miss your posts. I wonder if I should relate the story of my crutchless overalls. Hmm.
And I thought the women were looking at me for my looks, not because my nuts were hanging out of my kecks.
Tried walking funny but my nuts had a mind of their own. Bit like when I farted and followed though, but that is another story, but equally as messy.

Thanks Buddy, likewise.

Offline John

Re: Buddy
« Reply #23 on: September 27, 2012, 07:44:03 PM »
I have removed the previous thread about buddy to archive as he is now a full member here. 

I hope everyone agrees with this?   8((()*/

A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline abs

Re: Buddy
« Reply #24 on: September 27, 2012, 07:46:53 PM »
I have removed the previous thread about buddy to archive as he is now a full member here. 

I hope everyone agrees with this?   8((()*/

 8@??)(

Offline ActualMat

Re: Buddy
« Reply #25 on: September 27, 2012, 08:32:17 PM »
Welcome back, Buddy!

BB

  • Guest
Re: Buddy
« Reply #26 on: September 27, 2012, 08:37:21 PM »
As you may be aware I have deleted my account on the Blue forum.
This has nothing to do with my belief that Jeremy is not guilty The reason I deleted my account, was because of repeated requests to the mods certain members were allowed to go off topic for personal reasons, and the forum was becoming a joke.
At some stage I may go back, but not under the current circumstancies. I feel let down by the mods, who in my opinion should have grasped the nettle.
It has now become the Steph, Paris forum. Both cases I know little about.
I will continue to defend the Bamber corner though.
I thank Tim for his kind words, and I am sure we will get on better in the future. 8((()*/

Welcome Buddy. Not sure we ever exchanged on the blue forum but I like to see good debate, so good to see you here  8((()*/

Offline Admin

Re: Buddy
« Reply #27 on: September 27, 2012, 09:03:08 PM »
I am sorry that you fell this way about the blue forum, you are one of the 'sensible' posters over there but unfortunately, as you have mentioned, the forum has become distracted and at this time, control has been put into the hands of the wrong people who are not debating but running what amounts to a witch hunt.

I am conscious that this site might be construed as 'Jeremy Bamber done it' forum but in the interst of debate we need to have people like you to put forward a balanced view as to why Jeremy Bamber didn't do it. At the moment we seem to be distracted b the blue forum but I'd hope we return to 'normal' as soon as.


A good post Joanne.  The distraction has been caused by two individuals who are only interested in their own self promotion.  It has reached the stage where a ban on both of them permanently has become a distinct possibility.

We would like to seek members views on this.  ?>)()<

Re: Buddy
« Reply #28 on: September 27, 2012, 09:11:48 PM »
I am sorry that you fell this way about the blue forum, you are one of the 'sensible' posters over there but unfortunately, as you have mentioned, the forum has become distracted and at this time, control has been put into the hands of the wrong people who are not debating but running what amounts to a witch hunt.

I am conscious that this site might be construed as 'Jeremy Bamber done it' forum but in the interst of debate we need to have people like you to put forward a balanced view as to why Jeremy Bamber didn't do it. At the moment we seem to be distracted b the blue forum but I'd hope we return to 'normal' as soon as.


A good post Joanne.  The distraction has been caused by two individuals who are only interested in their own self promotion.  It has reached the stage where a ban on both of them permanently has become a distinct possibility.

We would like to seek members views on this.  ?>)()<
I say disruptive posters should always be banned without exception. 
There is no place for people like that on the miscarriage of justice circuit. 
Zero tolerance and power to the people.   8(>((


« Last Edit: September 27, 2012, 09:14:14 PM by Bounty Hunter »

Offline John

Re: Buddy
« Reply #29 on: September 27, 2012, 09:25:53 PM »
I say disruptive posters should always be banned without exception. 
There is no place for people like that on the miscarriage of justice circuit. 
Zero tolerance and power to the people.   8(>((

Several people including myself have freely given of our time and assistance over the last few years only to have it shoved back in our faces.  I know that Hall in particular has had the police visit one unfortunate couple because of her paranoia and God knows how many others she has caused heartache to.  The best thing anyone could ever do for her is to ignore her...COMPLETELY.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.