Author Topic: Buddy  (Read 31843 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Andrea

Re: Buddy
« Reply #90 on: October 05, 2012, 11:00:31 PM »
He can scrub his own  @)(++(*

Make sure he does behind his lugs.

Offline puglove

Re: Buddy
« Reply #91 on: October 05, 2012, 11:06:21 PM »
He can scrub his own  @)(++(*

Make sure he does behind his lugs.

Blagh. That reminds me of old Grahame GOOCH!!

I wonder how long he'll keep that Lugg crap up?  Maniac.
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline Andrea

Re: Buddy
« Reply #92 on: October 05, 2012, 11:16:38 PM »
I think Bob made a challenge about lugg being Grahame, he asked for his fiver back or something!

Offline puglove

Re: Buddy
« Reply #93 on: October 05, 2012, 11:19:27 PM »
I think Bob made a challenge about lugg being Grahame, he asked for his fiver back or something!

Yes, he said "You are Grahame Belton and I claim my five pounds"!! Bob's a legend.
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline John

Re: Buddy
« Reply #94 on: October 06, 2012, 12:23:09 AM »
John, it´s just that so much of the written material from the EP is so very inaccurate that I have a hard time putting 100% faith in it. Really, honestly.

Which written material do you mean abs?    The logs will be in a bit of a state anyway as the coordinating officer will be getting information from all sorts of sources, some conflicting.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline abs

Re: Buddy
« Reply #95 on: October 06, 2012, 02:06:52 PM »
Quote
Which written material do you mean abs?

This for instance - a mess.

 

Offline John

Re: Buddy
« Reply #96 on: October 06, 2012, 02:22:47 PM »
Quote
Which written material do you mean abs?

This for instance - a mess.

That is very easily explained abs. The person writing the log heard a report of a woman's body being seen and minutes later heard another report of a man's body being discovered. They weren't to know this was the same body abs.  You will observe that in some documents the word female is scored out.  No mystery abs but makes for an interesting conspiracy theory.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline abs

Re: Buddy
« Reply #97 on: October 06, 2012, 02:43:26 PM »
Quote
Which written material do you mean abs?

This for instance - a mess.

That is very easily explained abs. The person writing the log heard a report of a woman's body being seen and minutes later heard another report of a man's body being discovered. They weren't to know this was the same body abs.  You will observe that in some documents the word female is scored out.  No mystery abs but makes for an interesting conspiracy theory.

You misunderstand me. I don´t think there were two bodies downstairs, but the documents say it, two bodies found upon entrance, a male and a female - and then in another documents it says that three bodies were found upstairs.
It is a mess.

Offline John

Re: Buddy
« Reply #98 on: October 06, 2012, 03:00:36 PM »
Quote
Which written material do you mean abs?

This for instance - a mess.

That is very easily explained abs. The person writing the log heard a report of a woman's body being seen and minutes later heard another report of a man's body being discovered. They weren't to know this was the same body abs.  You will observe that in some documents the word female is scored out.  No mystery abs but makes for an interesting conspiracy theory.

You misunderstand me. I don´t think there were two bodies downstairs, but the documents say it, two bodies found upon entrance, a male and a female - and then in another documents it says that three bodies were found upstairs.
It is a mess.

I agree abs, it looks a mess for anyone reading it 27 years later but this sheet of paper is only a temporary log, it is not a definitive record of what was ultimately found.  Reading this sheet of paper conjures up all sorts of ideas but alone it means nothing abs.

Look at the final report and the statements and it is all explained in detail.  The initial report of a woman's body was an error since the officer who peeked in the kitchen window thought it to be a female because of the long hair.  On entering the house it was found to be one male and not a female.  Simples!
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline abs

Re: Buddy
« Reply #99 on: October 06, 2012, 03:03:39 PM »
Quote
Which written material do you mean abs?

This for instance - a mess.

That is very easily explained abs. The person writing the log heard a report of a woman's body being seen and minutes later heard another report of a man's body being discovered. They weren't to know this was the same body abs.  You will observe that in some documents the word female is scored out.  No mystery abs but makes for an interesting conspiracy theory.

You misunderstand me. I don´t think there were two bodies downstairs, but the documents say it, two bodies found upon entrance, a male and a female - and then in another documents it says that three bodies were found upstairs.
It is a mess.

I agree abs, it looks a mess for anyone reading it 27 years later but this sheet of paper is only a temporary log, it is not a definitive record of what was ultimately found.  Reading this sheet of paper conjures up all sorts of ideas but alone it means nothing abs.

Look at the final report and the statements and it is all explained in detail.  The initial report of a woman's body was an error since the officer who peeked in the kitchen window thought it to be a female because of the long hair.  On entering the house it was found to be one male and not a female.  Simples!

John, you are explaining things to me that I already know.

Offline John

Re: Buddy
« Reply #100 on: October 06, 2012, 03:17:20 PM »
John, you are explaining things to me that I already know.

I accept that is probably the case so why are you doubting the final analysis abs?   It is just nonsense to suggest that Sheila was downstairs.  Sheila's souls of her feet and the souls of her slippers had no glass fragments on them.  The kitchen floor was covered in glass shards and fragments after the lamp shade was shattered when the rifle was used to batter Nevill.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Milly

Re: Buddy
« Reply #101 on: October 06, 2012, 04:28:11 PM »
See what you have started now buddy     @)(++(*  8(>((


Imo there is ample evidence of what went on at the farm and it is to be expected that jeremys supporters would grasp onto all and any inconsistencies in order to try to discredit the official version of events. ?{)(**

When you coming back up to Essex John?  We are overdue for a coffee at Osea.  ?{)(**

Offline Myster

Re: Buddy
« Reply #102 on: October 06, 2012, 06:18:41 PM »


John, you are explaining things to me that I already know.

 @)(++(* @)(++(* ....sorry abs....I just had to laugh at that put-down!
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline abs

Re: Buddy
« Reply #103 on: October 06, 2012, 07:49:27 PM »


John, you are explaining things to me that I already know.

 @)(++(* @)(++(* ....sorry abs....I just had to laugh at that put-down!

Laugh away.
BTW, I am not a supporter, I am a fence sitter. Just not convinced either way. Two (or was it three?) of the jurors weren´t convinced of Jeremy´s guilt either, so I guess it is not that far out.

Offline Myster

Re: Buddy
« Reply #104 on: October 06, 2012, 08:04:40 PM »


John, you are explaining things to me that I already know.

 @)(++(* @)(++(* ....sorry abs....I just had to laugh at that put-down!

Laugh away.
BTW, I am not a supporter, I am a fence sitter. Just not convinced either way. Two (or was it three?) of the jurors weren´t convinced of Jeremy´s guilt either, so I guess it is not that far out.

I know abs....... I've read your posts long enough to realise you're undecided, and I did suggest once you were sitting on the fence.

No offence intended, by the way.  8)-)))
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.