Author Topic: A Question of Propaganda.  (Read 260928 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: A Question of Propaganda.
« Reply #1215 on: December 29, 2015, 06:59:08 PM »
Actually, on this thread I am more interested in the use of propaganda to mould opinion.

I find it fascinating the manner in which you and other sceptics insist with almost every post the effectiveness of propaganda as a tool in Madeleine McCann's case.

I am convinced that had the innocent Drs McCann been innocent Portuguese they would have been barracked next door to the Cipriano case convicts.

Staggering reply, when all you attempt to do on here, is to try and show the mccanns in a good light, and dismiss anything but abduction.

THAT IS PURE PROPAGANDA.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: A Question of Propaganda.
« Reply #1216 on: December 29, 2015, 06:59:48 PM »
Yet you repeatedly type abduction. 8**8:/:

I would say based on the evidence abduction is odds on favourite...which is just about what Redwood said..

Offline G-Unit

Re: A Question of Propaganda.
« Reply #1217 on: December 29, 2015, 07:00:28 PM »
i would say it has

If SY have ruled out the parents...taht basically proves abduction

If "ifs" and "buts" were candy and nuts, we'd all have a merry Christmas.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: A Question of Propaganda.
« Reply #1218 on: December 29, 2015, 07:00:39 PM »
Hang on, don't ask me for evidence for something I haven't stated, you've stated that the Met have found nothing to link any of those they've interviewed to Madeleine's disappearance and all I want to know is - do you know this for a fact, or are you assuming?

Simple Alfred.

They clearly haven't found Madeleine.

Are you pretending they have ? 8)-)))

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: A Question of Propaganda.
« Reply #1219 on: December 29, 2015, 07:00:58 PM »
Conversely there is nothing to implicate the Needhams in Ben's disappearance such as statement anomalies or cadaver dog alerts.
So why did the PT AG say that there was a lack of evidence of any crime having been committed by either Murat or the McCanns when archiving the case?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: A Question of Propaganda.
« Reply #1220 on: December 29, 2015, 07:01:32 PM »
Quite comical really, berating propaganda then going full tilt in your last sentence.

hardly propaganda ...more the truth...which was the portuguese who said taht had the mccanns been portuguese they would have already been arrested

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: A Question of Propaganda.
« Reply #1221 on: December 29, 2015, 07:02:16 PM »
I would say based on the evidence abduction is odds on favourite...which is just about what Redwood said..

What a load of rollocks.

What evidence ?

Redwood was a believer, and has now b....red off into retirement.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: A Question of Propaganda.
« Reply #1222 on: December 29, 2015, 07:02:39 PM »
Simple Alfred.

They clearly haven't found Madeleine.

Are you pretending they have ? 8)-)))

Of course I'm not pretending that Madeleine has been found, but do you not concede that the Met may have found evidence, circumstantial at least, that may link one or more of these individuals with Madeleine's disappearance?
« Last Edit: December 30, 2015, 09:52:03 PM by Admin »

Offline Mr Gray

Re: A Question of Propaganda.
« Reply #1223 on: December 29, 2015, 07:02:46 PM »
Simple Alfred.

They clearly haven't found Madeleine.

Are you pretending they have ? 8)-)))

just so you understand...we all know Maddie has not been found...why do you continue with those stupid posts

Offline slartibartfast

Re: A Question of Propaganda.
« Reply #1224 on: December 29, 2015, 07:03:09 PM »
hardly propaganda ...more the truth...which was the portuguese who said taht had the mccanns been portuguese they would have already been arrested

I am sure you will provide a cite?
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: A Question of Propaganda.
« Reply #1225 on: December 29, 2015, 07:04:42 PM »
What a load of rollocks.

What evidence ?

Redwood was a believer, and has now b....red off into retirement.

Redwood said "we" when he talked of the evidence. im not sure how short your memory is but we have discussed taht the whole justice system is based on belief...but it was a  week ago

Offline Mr Gray

Re: A Question of Propaganda.
« Reply #1226 on: December 29, 2015, 07:05:42 PM »
I am sure you will provide a cite?

i'm rather shocked that you have asked me to...have you not been following the case

Offline slartibartfast

Re: A Question of Propaganda.
« Reply #1227 on: December 29, 2015, 07:06:37 PM »
i'm rather shocked that you have asked me to...have you not been following the case

So that's a no?
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Brietta

Re: A Question of Propaganda.
« Reply #1228 on: December 29, 2015, 07:08:58 PM »
Quite comical really, berating propaganda then going full tilt in your last sentence.

My opinion only ... but based on the facts available of each case.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Mr Gray

Re: A Question of Propaganda.
« Reply #1229 on: December 29, 2015, 07:09:47 PM »
So that's a no?

Tapas Seven would have been arrested, if they were Portuguese - 24Horas