Author Topic: Did Nevill Sustain The Four Gunshot Wounds Upstairs On The Landing And Stairs?  (Read 37007 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Scipio, it is obviously straight-forward to identify bullets removed from victims by the pathologist at autopsy.  It is far less straight-forward to identify which bullets relate to which victims where the bullets have exited.  Were the exited bullets forensicially analysed for biological matter?  Not that I am aware of. 

It seems a given that DRH/35 x 2 relate to June since they were found embedded in the pillow she was using.  DRH/9 appears to also relate to June.  I don't accept DRH/5 necessarily relates to the graze wound NB sustained.  Fragments were seen radiologically but not at post mortem.  Dr Vanezis has suggested the reason for this is that the fragments were in clothing.  Therefore it is possible the non-fragmented part of the bullet could have lodged in NB's pyjamas and lost at various stages.  If it was difficult to determine visually whether the exited bullets were whole or fragmented then I would expect that to be determined by weight.  Were they weighed? 

June's wound '2' is unclear from the autopsy report in that fragments were identified at autopsy but no exit wound. 

As I pointed out previously the diagram layout of the casings identifies bullet DRH/35 x2, DRH/9 and DRH/5 as all pertaining to June.

Bottom line is excl the two casings to SC there were 9 casings in the main bedroom, 1 on the transition strip and 1 on the landing which supports my theory that NB did not sustain any gunshot wounds in the main bedroom.  NB sustained the gunshot wounds to his lip and jaw whilst he was stood on the two stairs immediately preceding the main entrance with the perp stood within the doorway.  Casing DRH/3 and DRH/4 pertain to these wounds.  NB sustained the gunshot wounds to his shoulder and elbow whilst he was on the main staircase with the perp behind him.  Casing DRH/13 and DRH/14 pertain to these wounds.  It is entirely plausible.  I have recently stated in another thread that exact measurements using lasers need to be taken from WHF taking into account all features such as door width, depth of stairs, width of spindles, including gaps between, and height of banisters.  I am afraid you will not convince me otherwise using marker pens on the diagram below. 

A police officer did not transfer casing DRH/14 from the kitchen to the landing under his foot.  Impossible.  NB and June were shot a total of 11 times upstairs if DRH/14 was transferred from the kitchen then a casing is missing from upstairs.
« Last Edit: December 18, 2015, 08:51:48 AM by Holly Goodhead »
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline rotti

Scipio, it is obviously straight-forward to identify bullets removed from victims by the pathologist at autopsy.  It is far less straight-forward to identify which bullets relate to which victims where the bullets have exited.  Were the exited bullets forensicially analysed for biological matter?  Not that I am aware of. 

It seems a given that DRH/35 x 2 relate to June since they were found embedded in the pillow she was using.  DRH/9 appears to also relate to June.  I don't accept DRH/5 necessarily relates to the graze wound NB sustained.  Fragments were seen radiologically but not at post mortem.  Dr Vanezis has suggested the reason for this is that the fragments were in clothing.  Therefore it is possible the non-fragmented part of the bullet could have lodged in NB's pyjamas and lost at various stages.  If it was difficult to determine visually whether the exited bullets were whole or fragmented then I would expect that to be determined by weight.  Were they weighed? 

June's wound '2' is unclear from the autopsy report in that fragments were identified at autopsy but no exit wound. 

As I pointed out previously the diagram layout of the casings identifies bullet DRH/35 x2, DRH/9 and DRH/5 as all pertaining to June.

Bottom line is excl the two casings to SC there were 9 casings in the main bedroom, 1 on the transition strip and 1 on the landing which supports my theory that NB did not sustain any gunshot wounds in the main bedroom.  NB sustained the gunshot wounds to his lip and jaw whilst he was stood on the two stairs immediately preceding the main entrance with the perp stood within the doorway.  Casing DRH/3 and DRH/4 pertain to these wounds.  NB sustained the gunshot wounds to his shoulder and elbow whilst he was on the main staircase with the perp behind him.  Casing DRH/13 and DRH/14 pertain to these wounds.  It is entirely plausible.  I have recently stated in another thread that exact measurements using lasers need to be taken from WHF taking into account all features such as door width, depth of stairs, width of spindles, including gaps between, and height of banisters.  I am afraid you will not convince me otherwise using marker pens on the diagram below. 

A police officer did not transfer casing DRH/14 from the kitchen to the landing under his foot.  Impossible.  NB and June were shot a total of 11 times upstairs if DRH/14 was transferred from the kitchen then a casing is missing from upstairs.
i see your point holly. &%+((£

Offline scipio_usmc

Scipio I did not assert that June was shot a total of 8 times.  I simply stated that the following document attributes all four bullets found in the bedroom to June.

It attributes 6 casings in the bedroom to June and the one on the landing.  Your reading comprehension skills either do not exist or you intentionally choose to pretend anything you feel like.
“...there are three classes of intellects: one which comprehends by itself; another which appreciates what others comprehend; and a third which neither comprehends by itself nor by the showing of others; the first is the most excellent, the second is good, the third is useless.”  Niccolò Machiavelli

Offline scipio_usmc

Scipio if you persist with this notion that casing DRH/7 equates to 2 separate casings then you deserve to be lumped together with Mike, JB and the CT.  Claiming DRH/7 equates to 2 separate casings is on par with the aforementioned claiming 2 dead bodies in the kitchen and 2 telephone calls. 

Worse still you attempt to liken the two bullets with exhibit label DRH/35 to the one casing with exhibit label DRH/7.  There is no comparison.  The reason there are two bullets with exhibit label DRH/35 is that the bullets were embedded in the pillow unbeknown to SoC officers.  When the pillow arrived at the lab for forensic analysis the two bullets were identified and hence the two bullets found by FSS simply retained the exhibit label DRH/35 which pertains to the pillow. SoC officers identified DRH/7 at the SoC.  It becomes plainly obvious DRH/7 relates to one casing from DC Hammersley's trial testimony.  Where two casings are referred to simply relates to the fact that two casings were found under the wardrobe DRH/7 and DRH/43 and two casings can be seen in crime scene photo 40.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=165.0;attach=201

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=165.0;attach=219

The above can all be evidenced by crime scene photo 40: One casing DRH/7 and one casing DRH/43: two cases found under the wardrobe.

The one like Mike is you.  I presented the actual evidence in this case.  The diagram says there are 2 bullets in exhibit DRH/7, the trial testimony says there were 2 casings the ballistic report says it consisted of multiple casing the report by Hammersley says it consisted of 2 casings.

You MADE UP that it is one casing and in so doing you claim there were only 24 casings found at the scene.  Where did the 25th casings go?  Did it vanish?

You make up things just like Mike in order to then allege idiotic things that make no sense to try to pretend Jeremy is innocent.  That is exactly what Mike does he ignores evidence and reality to make up nonsense.

The diagram you place so much stock in clearly states 5 of ten casings related to June in the first episode and lists those 10 casings.  DRH/7 is listed twice and on the drawing twice because it was 2 casings.  Only with it listed twice are there 10 casings in that list that states it is composed of ten.

Exhibit DRH/39 also consisted of 2 casings.  Hammersley did such 2 times not just one. You spend all your time ignoring facts and thus can't get a single thing right ever.  It takes extreme ignorance or outright dishonesty to claim Nevill could be shot to his left profile form someone standing in the master bedroom doorway as Nevill was on the stairs.

For the sake of accuracy here are the 25 casings:

Associated with Master Bedroom Shootings:
1) DRH/1 right side of Sheila's body
2) DRH/2 Left hand side of Sheila's body
3) DRH/3 on the floor inside the door of the main bedroom to the left of June's body.
4) DRH/4 next to DRH/3
5) DRH/6 top of quit right hand side of the bed
6) DRH/7a under wardrobe
7) DRH/7b under wardrobe
8) DRH/8 left hand side of bed 4inches from the pillow
9) DRH/10  on the quilt right hand side of the bed on floor.
10) DRH/11 right hand side of bed on the floor near the wardrobe
11) DRH/12 on the floor right hand side of the bed
12) DRH/13 metal strip of doorway
13) DRH/43 under the wardrobe right hand side of bed

Kitchen Episode:
14) DRH/14...landing floor adjacent to the wall.
15) DRH/19
16) DRH/20
17) DRH/41

TWINS ROOM
18) DRH/16 floor between both beds
19) DRH/17 On wooden cabinet between both beds
20) DRH18 right hand side of bed
21) DRH/37 under wooden bedside cabinet
22) DRH/38 Under right hand side of the bed at the head of the bed
23) DRH 39 right hand corner under right hand side of the bed
24) DRH/39 right hand side bed
25) DRH 40 under the middle of the right hand bed

YOu render yourself little more than a joke when you ignore trial testimony which expressly states the photo they are examining shows two casings in exhibit DRH/7 and then ridiculously assert the testimony was false and that there was only one.  It makes you appear to be a dishonest clown but if instead tyou are just thoroughly incompetent that is just as bad.

For the coup de grace here is the lab examination record for DRH/7 which not only clearly states it consisted of 2 spent cases it also provides a drawing for the head stamp of BOTH cases.  The firing pin hot them in different locations. The cases have a big fat E which stands for Eley the manufacturer. You cna tell which way the case was spun and sitting int he chamber when the firing pin struck. They were quite differently positioned based on the firing pin impression being to the upper left of the E for one casings and lower right of the E for the other casing.

Now whine how you are not being treated fairly after you accuse others of lying when it is you who are so wrong and clueless.
“...there are three classes of intellects: one which comprehends by itself; another which appreciates what others comprehend; and a third which neither comprehends by itself nor by the showing of others; the first is the most excellent, the second is good, the third is useless.”  Niccolò Machiavelli

Offline rotti

The one like Mike is you.  I presented the actual evidence in this case.  The diagram says there are 2 bullets in exhibit DRH/7, the trial testimony says there were 2 casings the ballistic report says it consisted of multiple casing the report by Hammersley says it consisted of 2 casings.

You MADE UP that it is one casing and in so doing you claim there were only 24 casings found at the scene.  Where did the 25th casings go?  Did it vanish?

You make up things just like Mike in order to then allege idiotic things that make no sense to try to pretend Jeremy is innocent.  That is exactly what Mike does he ignores evidence and reality to make up nonsense.

The diagram you place so much stock in clearly states 5 of ten casings related to June in the first episode and lists those 10 casings.  DRH/7 is listed twice and on the drawing twice because it was 2 casings.  Only with it listed twice are there 10 casings in that list that states it is composed of ten.

Exhibit DRH/39 also consisted of 2 casings.  Hammersley did such 2 times not just one. You spend all your time ignoring facts and thus can't get a single thing right ever.  It takes extreme ignorance or outright dishonesty to claim Nevill could be shot to his left profile form someone standing in the master bedroom doorway as Nevill was on the stairs.

For the sake of accuracy here are the 25 casings:

Associated with Master Bedroom Shootings:
1) DRH/1 right side of Sheila's body
2) DRH/2 Left hand side of Sheila's body
3) DRH/3 on the floor inside the door of the main bedroom to the left of June's body.
4) DRH/4 next to DRH/3
5) DRH/6 top of quit right hand side of the bed
6) DRH/7a under wardrobe
7) DRH/7b under wardrobe
8) DRH/8 left hand side of bed 4inches from the pillow
9) DRH/10  on the quilt right hand side of the bed on floor.
10) DRH/11 right hand side of bed on the floor near the wardrobe
11) DRH/12 on the floor right hand side of the bed
12) DRH/13 metal strip of doorway
13) DRH/43 under the wardrobe right hand side of bed

Kitchen Episode:
14) DRH/14...landing floor adjacent to the wall.
15) DRH/19
16) DRH/20
17) DRH/41

TWINS ROOM
18) DRH/16 floor between both beds
19) DRH/17 On wooden cabinet between both beds
20) DRH18 right hand side of bed
21) DRH/37 under wooden bedside cabinet
22) DRH/38 Under right hand side of the bed at the head of the bed
23) DRH 39 right hand corner under right hand side of the bed
24) DRH/39 right hand side bed
25) DRH 40 under the middle of the right hand bed

YOu render yourself little more than a joke when you ignore trial testimony which expressly states the photo they are examining shows two casings in exhibit DRH/7 and then ridiculously assert the testimony was false and that there was only one.  It makes you appear to be a dishonest clown but if instead tyou are just thoroughly incompetent that is just as bad.

For the coup de grace here is the lab examination record for DRH/7 which not only clearly states it consisted of 2 spent cases it also provides a drawing for the head stamp of BOTH cases.  The firing pin hot them in different locations. The cases have a big fat E which stands for Eley the manufacturer. You cna tell which way the case was spun and sitting int he chamber when the firing pin struck. They were quite differently positioned based on the firing pin impression being to the upper left of the E for one casings and lower right of the E for the other casing.

Now whine how you are not being treated fairly after you accuse others of lying when it is you who are so wrong and clueless.

i think its pretty clear now holly.explained beautifully once again by master Scipio usmc 8@??)(

Offline scipio_usmc

Scipio, it is obviously straight-forward to identify bullets removed from victims by the pathologist at autopsy.  It is far less straight-forward to identify which bullets relate to which victims where the bullets have exited.  Were the exited bullets forensicially analysed for biological matter?  Not that I am aware of.

All that matters is the fact that only 3 bullets exited June so only 3 of the 4 bullets recovered in the bedroom could be related to the shots fired to June.  Only someone who has an IQ under 70 can't understand such.

Nevill suffered a graze wound.  The bullet didn't enter his body so there should have been a 4th loose bullet in the room and there was. It makes no difference which of the 3 specifically relate to June and which is the one  that relates to Nevill all that matters is that it is an irrefutable fact that only 3 relate to June and 1 relates to Nevill.

You dishonestly want to IGNORE the medical records and go with an erroneous statement written on a diagram BEFORE police knew that June only suffered 3 exit wounds so the 4th bullet had to relate to Nevill.  All that does is demonstrate you to be an untrustworthy clown.  A claim on a diagram can't refute medical evidence.

It seems a given that DRH/35 x 2 relate to June since they were found embedded in the pillow she was using.  DRH/9 appears to also relate to June.  I don't accept DRH/5 necessarily relates to the graze wound NB sustained.  Fragments were seen radiologically but not at post mortem.  Dr Vanezis has suggested the reason for this is that the fragments were in clothing.  Therefore it is possible the non-fragmented part of the bullet could have lodged in NB's pyjamas and lost at various stages.  If it was difficult to determine visually whether the exited bullets were whole or fragmented then I would expect that to be determined by weight.  Were they weighed?

Of course they were weighed.  All 4 are so large and heavy that they can't be part of any fragments recovered by Vanezis. The 4 fragments recovered at autopsy are the bulk of 4 individual bullets.  The 4 loose ones are the bulk of 4 individual bullets. The ONLY way that all 8 could relate to June would be if June had suffered 8 gunshot wounds not 7.

Nevill's xray showed very tiny particles in his side area.  These particles were WAY TO SMALL to be more than a quarter of a bullet and clearly were less than that.  Because they were so small they were not able to be found.

DRH/5 weighed 37 grains so 92.5% of a complete bullet if they were 40 grain rounds or 98.6% if they were 37.5 grain rounds.  Eley markerted 37.5 and 40 grain rounds and nothing has been presented on Blue which shows which is what Nevill purchased.  Either way there was less than 10% of the round missing.

DRH/9 weighed 25.8 grains so either .645 if 40 grain or .688 if 37.5 grain rounds. Either way it is more than 2/3s of a complete round.

The bullets removed at autopsy weighed 2.29 grams, 2.42 grams, 1.79 grams and 1.77 grams.  If 40 grain then the complete bullets weighed 2.59 grams. So if 40 grain then he recovered more than 86% of each the bullets recovered from her chest, 69 percent of the bullet between her eyes and 68 percent of the bullet that entered above her right ear. 

June's wound '2' is unclear from the autopsy report in that fragments were identified at autopsy but no exit wound.

Wound 2 is the wound above her right ear.  There is nothing unclear, he recovered PV/26 from this wound.  PV/26 weighed 1.77 grams so at minimum 68% of the original bullet.  The remaining amount broke off into small parts that he could not recover. 

As I pointed out previously the diagram layout of the casings identifies bullet DRH/35 x2, DRH/9 and DRH/5 as all pertaining to June.

And as I pointed out that diagram was prepared before they knew that June only suffered 3 exit wounds and that Nevill suffered a graze wound thus before they were told by the experts that one of these bullets related to a graze wound Nevill suffered.

You keep humiliating yourself by saying we have to stick with the diagram though the experts stopped maintaining such and maintained at trial that one of the loose bullets pertained to Nevill's graze wound which the defense failed to challenge because they had no way to do so.  Only a moron would claim June suffered 7 wounds but was struck by 8 bullets.

In the meantime you keep ignoring that the diagram states 13 bullets were found in the bedroom and lists all 13.  It also lists DRH/14 and asserts it relates to a shot to June. They asserted on the diagram that 2 casings from the bedroom related to Sheila, that 1 case from the bedroom (DRH/13 and the case on the landing related to June's second episode. It asserted the remaining 10 cases found in the bedroom related to the first episode where June and Nevill were shot.  You are not only wrong you are not even consistent you ignore anything you feel like and just make up whatever you feel like.   

You want to live by the diagram so here is the diagram assertions about the casings:




Bottom line is excl the two casings to SC there were 9 casings in the main bedroom, 1 on the transition strip and 1 on the landing which supports my theory that NB did not sustain any gunshot wounds in the main bedroom.

First of all, how could 25 shots be fired by 24 casings?  The number of bullets and casings has to match.  You keep eliminating a casing yet keeping 25 shots fired. That alone should tell you that you ar enot making any sense.

Seocnd the casing against the transition strip was in the bedroom genius. Counting that casing there were 13 total in the bedroom.  The diagram you keep making such a big deal out of lists 13 casings found in the bedroom these 13 cases:

1) DRH/1 right side of Sheila's body
2) DRH/2 Left hand side of Sheila's body
3) DRH/3 on the floor inside the door of the main bedroom to the left of June's body.
4) DRH/4 next to DRH/3
5) DRH/6 top of quit right hand side of the bed
6) DRH/7a under wardrobe
7) DRH/7b under wardrobe
8) DRH/8 left hand side of bed 4inches from the pillow
9) DRH/10  on the quilt right hand side of the bed on floor.
10) DRH/11 right hand side of bed on the floor near the wardrobe
11) DRH/12 on the floor right hand side of the bed
12) DRH/13 metal strip of doorway
13) DRH/43 under the wardrobe right hand side of bed



You keep ignoring reality on how many cases were found in the bedroom and pretending that 8 bullets caused June's 7 wounds so you can pretend that the graze wound Nevill suffered was not suffered in the bedroom all so you can pretend Nevill wasn't shot in the bedroom.  It's bad enough you keep trying to pretend he wasn't shot in the bedroom but worse you keep telling us he was shot on the stairs though it is physically impossible for him to have been shot on the stairs because the ONLY WAY to achieve the trajectories of the wounds if he had been on the stairs would be by firing through the wall.  One has to be a blathering idiot to buy the nonsense you post. 


NB sustained the gunshot wounds to his lip and jaw whilst he was stood on the two stairs immediately preceding the main entrance with the perp stood within the doorway.  Casing DRH/3 and DRH/4 pertain to these wounds.

It's physically impossible to hit his lip and jaw at the angle and trajectory they were hit from the doorway.  So your theory is impossible.  If Nevill were on the stairs the wounds could only be delivered if fired through the wall. In the meantime firing from the doorway would result in the casings flying near the chair. You want us to believe they simply fell underneath the gun as if they simply dropped out of the bottom of the weapon.   But why bother you with reality when you couldn't care less about facts and just make up anything you feel like.

NB sustained the gunshot wounds to his shoulder and elbow whilst he was on the main staircase with the perp behind him.  Casing DRH/13 and DRH/14 pertain to these wounds.  It is entirely plausible.  I have recently stated in another thread that exact measurements using lasers need to be taken from WHF taking into account all features such as door width, depth of stairs, width of spindles, including gaps between, and height of banisters.  I am afraid you will not convince me otherwise using marker pens on the diagram below.

It's physically impossible to hit his shoulder and graze his arm and chest from the doorway if he were on the stairs.  The killer had to be facing his left profile.  The only way to hit him at the angles in question would be to shoot through the wall. You just keep embarrassing yourself by positing impossible nonsense.  In the meantime DRH/13 pertains to the shot between June's eyes.  That was the assessment even on the diagram you place so much stock in.  That diagram assessed DRH/14 was related to the shot to her head assuming the killer was in the hallway with the weapon's eject port facing the stairs when it was fired but after learning it was fired while she was in bed and learning about a casing missing from the kitchen decided DRH/14 was transferred from the kitchen. 

A police officer did not transfer casing DRH/14 from the kitchen to the landing under his foot.  Impossible.  NB and June were shot a total of 11 times upstairs if DRH/14 was transferred from the kitchen then a casing is missing from upstairs.


Impossible because you say so?  You are always wrong so your opinion means absolutely nothing. You are so hapless you keep telling us Nevill was shot on the stairs though it is physically impossible unless he were shot through the wall and keep telling us that 8 bullets caused June's 7 bullet wounds in order to pretend that the bullet that grazed Nevill wasn't in the bedroom. You even keep insisting there were only 24 casings found at WHF though you concede 25 shots were fired.  You make up your own rules out of thin air and your made up rules bear no relation to reality.  You make up there were 24 casings for no rational reason and keep denying irrefutable evidence that DRH/7 consisted of 2 casings.  That just renders you a joke.

25 casings total were recovered in the house.  3 in the kitchen, 1 on the landing, 13 in the master bedroom and 8 in the room the twins were shot in.

The victims suffered 25 gunshot wounds so the casings from all 25 gunshot wounds were recovered.

Nevill was shot 4 times in the kitchen but only 3 casings were found in the kitchen so 1 casing was missing.

June was shot 7 times in the master bedroom and Sheila was shot 2 times in the master bedroom.  That adds up to 9 but there were 13 found in the master bedroom so 4 more shots were fired in the master bedroom.  Nevill was shot 4 other times so clearly these relate to Nevill being shot.

4 bullets lodged inside June and were removed at autopsy.  3 bullets exited June so were in the house somewhere.

7 bullets lodged inside Nevill and were removed at autopsy.  1 bullet grazed Nevill so was in the house somewhere.

4 loose bullets were found in the bedroom. 3 related to June and the 4th to Nevill.

All 13 casings associated with the master bedroom shootings were accounted for.

All 8 casings associated with the shooting of the twins were found in their bedroom thus accounted for. 

The only missing case was from the kitchen so we know that DRH/14 was transferred from the kitchen.

Whether it stuck to Jeremy's shoe or a cops shoe there is no way to know.  It is not only possible but a fact that it stuck to a shoe of Jeremy or a cop because at the time it was found only the killer and cops had passed from the kitchen to where it was found.

Your claims are all impossible nonsense that ignores reality.
“...there are three classes of intellects: one which comprehends by itself; another which appreciates what others comprehend; and a third which neither comprehends by itself nor by the showing of others; the first is the most excellent, the second is good, the third is useless.”  Niccolò Machiavelli

Offline scipio_usmc

Nevill's 4 shots received to his left side were all fired at his side profile. The shooter fired into the left side of his jaw while the killer was facing the side of his jaw but Nevill was looking straight ahead. The same is true of the other shots. nevill's arm was raised so that the bullet grazed the back of his arm and then grazer across his chest. The lip shot came from the side slightly and slightly from the front. The shoulder shot cam slightly from the side but slightly behind.  None of these shots could be achieved unless the killer and Nevill were like this:

                left                                       front
Killer  Back-Front                     Nevill left-right
                right                                     back


How could the killer and Nevill be in such positions while Nevill was on the stairs?  With Nevill on the stairs the shooter would have to fire through the wall to be able to achieve such shots.

This shows the angle of shots that could be achieved from shooting from right inside the doorway. The wall blocks the ability to target the left side of someone who is on the stairs.  Holly's suggestions are ludicrous.


“...there are three classes of intellects: one which comprehends by itself; another which appreciates what others comprehend; and a third which neither comprehends by itself nor by the showing of others; the first is the most excellent, the second is good, the third is useless.”  Niccolò Machiavelli

Offline John

Do you know how to count Holly?  June was shot 7 times.  She suffered 3 exit wounds which means 3 bullets exited her body.  Fragments from 4 different bullets were removed from June's body.  4 plus 3=7.  To anyone who can count and comprehends that there were only 3 exit wounds comprehends that only 3 of the 4 fragments recovered from the master bedroom were associated with her 3 exit wounds. The 4th (most likely DRH/5) was associated with Nevill's graze wound.   

Sheila
upper wound (chin) PV/19
lower wound (neck) PV/20

Nevill
1) PV/8 front of right ear/exit left ear but still in the body
2) PV/9 slightly above wound 1
3) PV/3 top of skull
4) PV/4 top of skull
5) PV/10 (lip)         
6) PV/11 (jaw)
7)PV/2  (Shoulder)
8)DRH/5 (Arm/chest Graze wound)

Wounds 1-4 were received in the kitchen, wounds 5-8 in the master bedroom. DRH/5 was recovered in the master bedroom.

June
1) PV/25 between eyes
2) PV/26 above right ear
3) DRH/35a lower neck (bullet exited into pillow)
4) DRH/35b forearm (bullet exited into pillow)
5) PV/24 right upper chest
6) PV/23 lower chest
7) DRH/9 knee (bullet exited into bed)

There was 1 casing on the landing and it was in the corner directly against the wall. That casing was transported from the kitchen and was kicked off of the shoe it attached to thus landing right against the wall. DRH/13 was just inside the bedroom doorway touching the metal transition plate.  Not only did the ballistic expert state such so did Hammersley in his report:



and trial testimony:



13 casings were found in the master bedroom.  1 on the landing (which was assocated with a shot fired in the kitchen), 3 in the kitchen and 8 in the boys room. 

Exhibit DRH/7 consisted of 2 casings not one just like DRH/35 consisted of 2 bullets not one.  So you start right off the bat with an error.

DRH/14 is the missing casing from the kitchen.  It either stuck to the killer's shoe or a cop's shoe and was kicked off while on the landing resulting in it ending up in a corner right against the wall. It was right in the area where the wall meets the floor of the landing. 

13 casings were in the master bedroom. DRH/1 &2 were associated with Sheila's wounds.  The remaining 11- DRH: 3, 4, 6, 7a, 7b, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 43 were associated with the 11 wounds June and Nevill suffered in the bedroom.  DRH/3 and 4 were most likely associated with the 2 chest shots to June which she received as she was getting out of bed.  DRH/13 is associated with the shot between her eyes and DRH/8 associated with a shot to Nevill.


6, 7a, 7b, 10, 11, 12 and 43 are associated with the remaining 3 shots to Nevill and 4 shots June suffered while lying in bed. Since they are all in the same vicinity there is no way to try to separate them out.  DRH/8 was on the bed thus landed on top of June.  That could only happen if the gun were being aimed at Nevill's side of the bed so we know it pertains to a shot fired at Nevill. The other 3 casings from Nevill's shots either bounced off the bed as she was kicking the covers or fell off when she got up.  There is no sure way to separate out which 3 bounced/fell off from the 4 that were associated with her being shot in bed since they were all in the same area.  One could be simplistic and say the 3 on the floor closest to the bed were associated with the shots to Nevill and other 4 to June but that might not be the case.

 

Very well explained Scipio.  I went into this in detail some time ago and came to the same conclusions.  As with most things in this case it is a matter of common sense. 
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline John

The Jeremy Bamber forum AKA blue forum has many primary documents which are conveniently indexed in the archive section.  It is worth registering  there in order to be able to read such documents.  Many of the claims made there consist of lies and nonsense, particularly from Mike T and his fans but if you ignore such and read the materials you will be able to get a strong understanding.  I have explored all the supporter claims particularly the most damning ones to see if there is any truth to their allegations.  Upon scrutiny they all fall apart. The stuff that really attracts you to this case- the claims of police switching moderators, moving bodies around, shooting the victims etc all turned out to be utter bunk. When all that crap is stripped away it is a pretty mundane case. The notion police concealed receiving a phone call from Nevill particularly intrigued me. I thought maybe they were railroading Jeremy. But after I found out the frivolous basis of such allegations and the others it became clear that supporters like Mike and the Campaign Team are out to distort and play games for their own purposes simply.

I agree, strip away the silly conspiracy theories and the case is relatively simple.  A psychopathic adopted son full of hate and driven by greed, it was always going to end badly.

As far as the topic heading is concerned, had Nevill been shot on the landing outside the master bedroom then all the empty shell casdings would have ended up on the landing or the stairs and not in the bedroom itself.
« Last Edit: December 19, 2015, 12:39:19 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline John

Scipio if you persist with this notion that casing DRH/7 equates to 2 separate casings then you deserve to be lumped together with Mike, JB and the CT.  Claiming DRH/7 equates to 2 separate casings is on par with the aforementioned claiming 2 dead bodies in the kitchen and 2 telephone calls. 

Worse still you attempt to liken the two bullets with exhibit label DRH/35 to the one casing with exhibit label DRH/7.  There is no comparison.  The reason there are two bullets with exhibit label DRH/35 is that the bullets were embedded in the pillow unbeknown to SoC officers.  When the pillow arrived at the lab for forensic analysis the two bullets were identified and hence the two bullets found by FSS simply retained the exhibit label DRH/35 which pertains to the pillow. SoC officers identified DRH/7 at the SoC.  It becomes plainly obvious DRH/7 relates to one casing from DC Hammersley's trial testimony.  Where two casings are referred to simply relates to the fact that two casings were found under the wardrobe DRH/7 and DRH/43 and two casings can be seen in crime scene photo 40.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=165.0;attach=201

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=165.0;attach=219

The above can all be evidenced by crime scene photo 40: One casing DRH/7 and one casing DRH/43: two cases found under the wardrobe.

Holly, it is clearly stated in the original forensics report that DRH/7 relates to cases, plural.

« Last Edit: December 21, 2015, 04:13:41 AM by Admin »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline scipio_usmc

I agree, strip away the silly conspiracy theories and the case is relatively simple.  A psychopathic adopted son full of hate and driven by greed, it was always going to end badly.

As far as the topic heading is concerned, had Nevill been shot on the landing outside the master bedroom then all the empty shell casdings would have ended up on the landing or the stairs and not in the bedroom itself.

If Nevill were shot while on the stairs while the killer was in the hall then the casing would have gone down the stairs or in the hall near Sheila's door.  If firing from in the bedroom at someone on the stairs then the casings would have gone in the room by the chair.  but the casing location is less significant than the fact that it is not possible for Nevill to be shot on the stairs at the angles/locations where he was shot.  The fact it is impossible for him to be shot at such locations tells us tha tit is impossible for him to be shot on the stairs.  SO there is no need to even look at the location of the casings.

Nevill was neither shot from the front nor the back he was shot to his side profile.  Unless someone is firing though the wall he can't be shot in such manner while on the stairs. Since the shots did not pass through the wall we know this didn't happen.

Holly devotes a great deal of time to distorting the casing evidence in order to assert the impossible happened.

“...there are three classes of intellects: one which comprehends by itself; another which appreciates what others comprehend; and a third which neither comprehends by itself nor by the showing of others; the first is the most excellent, the second is good, the third is useless.”  Niccolò Machiavelli

Offline adam

I agree, strip away the silly conspiracy theories and the case is relatively simple.  A psychopathic adopted son full of hate and driven by greed, it was always going to end badly.

As far as the topic heading is concerned, had Nevill been shot on the landing outside the master bedroom then all the empty shell casdings would have ended up on the landing or the stairs and not in the bedroom itself.

It's a high profile case where the police changed stance after one month and the only other suspect can't speak.

Bamber reached the point of no return quickly. And he is much too arrogant to admit guilt and say his plan failed. At just 25 upon conviction, a release on a technicality, even if it took ten years was worth going for. He failed to get this, but got so used to trying he just continued, cheered on by a few supporters.

It is a straight forward case.

Offline Holly Goodhead

John/Scipio

No I disagree entirely.  We know for a fact the standard of communication/paperwork is poor.  Hence:-

- In communication with someone in WHF
- Two dead bodies [in kitchen] 1 x dead male 1 x dead female
- Two tel calls which give the impression they are from two different callers: JB and NB

Taken at face value the above appear to exonerate JB but delve a little deeper and it appears they are little more than ambiguities/genuine errors in paperwork.

However I have a deep sense of unease with regard to DRH/7, DRH/14 and the exited bullets on par with the silencer:

DRH/7

1. Who was responsible for drawing up the diagram below?

2. Why would two separate casings be given the same unique number?

3. Why does the general examination record refer to two casings DRH/7 labelled A and B "for convenience"?

4. Why does the above document state "P'king (packaging I assume) has been cut open and stapled closed at some time"

5. At trail no reference is made of DRH/7 A and DRH/7 B.  Simply DRH/7.  Crime scene photographs 40 and 41 are referred to.  It is somewhat ambiguous in that DRH/7 and DRH/43 were found under the wardrobe.  My interpretation of the testimony is that it is referring to two casings under the wardrobe DRH/7 and DRH/43 and there's no second DRH/7 or DRH/7 A and DRH/7 B?

DRH/14

It is claimed this casing found on the landing was there as a result of a police officer transferring it from the kitchen under his boot. 

1. Was this casing forensically analysed in an attempt to find any evidence to support this?  Along with boots from police officers and JB's footwear eg to look for indentations?

2. The casing was found against a wall which seems a strange location if it was transferred to that location by way of a boot?

3. The diagram questions whether this pertained to a wound sustained by June?  (If we are to accept the diagram has two casings DRH/7 this equates to a total of 12 casings for NB and June (NB shot 4 x's upstairs; June shot 7 times).

Exited Bullets

June sustained 7 gunshot wounds.  3 bullets exited, 3 were recovered at autopsy along with fragments associated with another gunshot wound.

1. The diagram  below states the following bullets all pertain to wounds sustained by June?

DRH/5

DRH/9

DRH/35 x 2

Scipio claims in post #110:

And as I pointed out that diagram was prepared before they knew that June only suffered 3 exit wounds and that Nevill suffered a graze wound thus before they were told by the experts that one of these bullets related to a graze wound Nevill suffered.

You keep humiliating yourself by saying we have to stick with the diagram though the experts stopped maintaining such and maintained at trial that one of the loose bullets pertained to Nevill's graze wound which the defense failed to challenge because they had no way to do so.  Only a moron would claim June suffered 7 wounds but was struck by 8 bullets.


And yet DC Hammersley was one of 4 officers who attended the complete post mortems on 7th and 8th August.  We know the diagram was drawn up after 8th August as casing DRH/43 was not found until 9th August.  We also know on 8th August, after the last post mortem, Dr Vanezis attended WHF with all four officers who attended post mortem.  This being the case how did they make so many howlers in the diagram? 

(For the record Scipio I have never claimed June was struck by 8 bullets).

The following docs have been uploaded to support the above:

1. Casing layout diagram - casings in main bedroom.
2. General Examination Record - DRH/7
3. Autopsy report - June's GSW '2' which refers to fragments.  Dr Vanezis does  not make reference to fragments associated with any of June's other wounds.
4. Trial testimony - casing DRH/7 and DRH/43
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Holly Goodhead

As it stands I still support my theory that NB was shot twice on the two stairs immediately preceding the entrance to the main bedroom with the perp stood within the doorway including casing ejection port with the barrel extending onto landing where NB sustained the GSW's to his lip and jaw as evidenced by casings DRH/3 and DRH/4. 

NB turned to flee and was then on the main staircase facing down towards the hall with the perp behind him where he sustained the GSW's to the back of his elbow and shoulder as evidenced by casing DRH/13 and DRH/14.

There is nothing that makes this theory implausible.  Scipio's claims that it isn't possible to shoot through walls (no bullet holes found in walls) are in fact correct.  However my theory doesn't require shots through walls.  It is clear from diagrams and SoC photos my theory is entirely plausible.

There is nothing in Scipio's claims that diminishes my theory in any shape or form.

« Last Edit: December 20, 2015, 09:37:51 AM by Holly Goodhead »
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Myster

Regarding DRH13 and DRH14 attributed to June? - it seems feasible that both could have been fired by the perp standing in the area of the black spot near the capital D in diagram below, with the rifle pointing down at June's head. The impact of the two shells ejecting downwards and to the right was cushioned by the carpet, resulting in DRH13 coming to rest on the doorway metal strip and DRH14 tumbling down alongside the skirting to the lower landing. Rather than the latter being carried up jammed in and released, from a boot sole or from a stovepipe blockage in the rifle.

[attachment deleted by admin]
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.