So Kate McCann assessed the rate, depth, regularity and more and concluded that the twins were likely to have been sedated. She then did....................nothing, zero, nil. Unacceptable.
Of course it is and then she compounds their calumny by claiming in her book that she tried to alert the police officers at the scene of her concerns ( knocking into the long grass the claims by some here that, due to her experience as an anaethetist she knew that the twins were okay just by putting a hand on their backs ) even though not one person, even those closest to her on the night, claim they saw her do this.
From Madeleine :
"On the night Madeleine was taken, you may remember, Gerry and I had been very concerned that Sean and Amelie had hardly moved in their cots, let alone woken up, despite the commotion in the apartment. Since Madeleine was snatched apparently without making a sound, we had always suspected that all three children might have been sedated by the abductor.
We mentioned this to the police that night and several more times in the following weeks, but no testing of urine, blood or hair, which could have revealed the presence of drugs, had ever been done. Apparently, hair grows at a rate of approximately 1cm per month, so it was possible that hair samples taken even four months later could provide us with additional information. It was worth a shot, at least. I asked for samples of my own hair to be taken as well simply because I was fed up with the constant insinuations that I took tranquillizers, sleeping pills or any medication, for that matter."
