Author Topic: "they didn't check on them like they afterwards declared they did" claim.  (Read 38782 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: "they didn't check on them like they afterwards declared they did" claim.
« Reply #150 on: February 02, 2016, 02:16:40 PM »

And again, she is quoting from what she was able to find in the files... i.e. that someone had stated it.

If one understood as facts that have been ascertained in the investigation those that, with rigour and according to procedural-penal dogmatism, resulted from the investigation, it is believed that only one would deserve that qualification – the disappearance of Madeleine MacCann.

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id505.html

^^^^^ THIS.

Offline John

Re: "they didn't check on them like they afterwards declared they did" claim.
« Reply #151 on: February 02, 2016, 02:24:46 PM »
PROVED FACTS

Taking into account the matter considered undisputed in the selection of facts and the decision handed down in due course after producing the matter of evidence and discussing the case, the following facts are demonstrated :

6. The British police dogs “Eddie” and “Keela” detected human blood and cadaver in the apartment 5A, Ocean Club [alínea AR) of the undisputed facts].

7. The British police dogs “Eddie” and “Keela” detected human blood and cadaver in a vehicle rented by the claimants after the disappearance of MMC [alínea AS) of the undisputed facts].



Without searching through everything paragraph AR and AS of the 'undisputed facts' ?
« Last Edit: February 02, 2016, 02:28:32 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Eleanor

Re: "they didn't check on them like they afterwards declared they did" claim.
« Reply #152 on: February 02, 2016, 02:25:05 PM »
Are we saying that Judges in Portugal have a right to rule on Criminal evidence in the total absence of a Trial, the presence of a Witness, or a Defence?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: "they didn't check on them like they afterwards declared they did" claim.
« Reply #153 on: February 02, 2016, 02:46:36 PM »
could someone explain how the proven facts contain unproven facts

Offline Carana

Re: "they didn't check on them like they afterwards declared they did" claim.
« Reply #154 on: February 02, 2016, 02:47:24 PM »
Obviously the guests to this forum probably already have an interest in this forum and will know what the court found or proved or not proved.


Guests reading this forum may take opinion as fact, particularly if the two are not clearly distinguished.

Offline Carana

Re: "they didn't check on them like they afterwards declared they did" claim.
« Reply #155 on: February 02, 2016, 02:48:29 PM »
could someone explain how the proven facts contain unproven facts

Heaven knows I've tried....

(Lyrics to a song)
« Last Edit: February 02, 2016, 02:51:07 PM by Carana »

Offline Mr Gray

Re: "they didn't check on them like they afterwards declared they did" claim.
« Reply #156 on: February 02, 2016, 02:51:09 PM »
Heaven knows I've tried....

you have explained it very well...it seems other posters can or will not understand

Offline Angelo222

Re: "they didn't check on them like they afterwards declared they did" claim.
« Reply #157 on: February 02, 2016, 02:51:36 PM »
Far be it for me to detract from the herculean efforts being made to discredit Portuguese justice but undisputed facts mean exactly that, undisputed.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Angelo222

Re: "they didn't check on them like they afterwards declared they did" claim.
« Reply #158 on: February 02, 2016, 02:52:30 PM »
Heaven knows I've tried....

(Lyrics to a song)

Not very well imo
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: "they didn't check on them like they afterwards declared they did" claim.
« Reply #159 on: February 02, 2016, 02:57:53 PM »
Without searching through everything paragraph AR and AS of the 'undisputed facts' ?

Undisputed that the assertion (is in the files).

Nothing else.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: "they didn't check on them like they afterwards declared they did" claim.
« Reply #160 on: February 02, 2016, 03:02:34 PM »
Are we saying that Judges in Portugal have a right to rule on Criminal evidence in the total absence of a Trial, the presence of a Witness, or a Defence?
Looks like it!

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: "they didn't check on them like they afterwards declared they did" claim.
« Reply #161 on: February 02, 2016, 03:04:13 PM »
Not very well imo
Carana, John and myself have all explained it very well, I think even Alice had a go.  The fact that you stubbornly refuse to accept what is blindingly obvious to the rest of us is your problem, or perhaps you're just doing it because you know it winds people up?

Offline Angelo222

Re: "they didn't check on them like they afterwards declared they did" claim.
« Reply #162 on: February 02, 2016, 03:10:03 PM »
Carana, John and myself have all explained it very well, I think even Alice had a go.  The fact that you stubbornly refuse to accept what is blindingly obvious to the rest of us is your problem, or perhaps you're just doing it because you know it winds people up?

Nothing you have stated changes the Archive Report regardless of what a judge eight years later attached to her ruling.  The police found the checking claim to be unsubstantiated.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline sadie

Re: "they didn't check on them like they afterwards declared they did" claim.
« Reply #163 on: February 02, 2016, 03:13:46 PM »
No Carana, that is what you were appearing to do ?

Now just to help you out, here are the questions I asked you, which you did not respond to.

' So  you think the McCann's told the truth about the checking system ?

Can you remind us of how many times on May the 3rd, either of them checked and/or viewed their children directly after going to wine and dine ?  '
stephen, I have done this before for you.  Why are you choosing not to remember it ?


Mcc's left the apartment at 8.30, having checked that the children were sleeping.

Gerry did first check 35 mins later at 9.05

Kate got up to check at 9'30/9.35 pm, but Matt, who was doing his own check, offered to do it for Kate.  Matt went into apartment 5A ,, saw the twins sleeping but Madeleine was out of sight around the corner.  All was peaceful so he naturally assumed all was well with Madeleine.

Kate did her check at about 10pm to find Madeleine missing.


So:
Arrived 8.30
Gerry checked 9.05
Matt checked 9.35
Kate checked 10.00


Every half hour checked.  Matt did an additional audio check by listening at the window (at about 9 pm IIRC.)  Despite this Gerry rechecked, presumably he felt that he preferred a sighted check.


Now, stephen will you please stop bringing up this same old chestnut.  Seems that by any means you are trying to demean and destroy the Mccanns
How about being honest and decent?.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: "they didn't check on them like they afterwards declared they did" claim.
« Reply #164 on: February 02, 2016, 03:27:59 PM »
Sadie, Matt and Russ left to check at 9:25 according to them both after their starters not 9:30/35. And Matt said Kate left to check at 9:50 not 10.

"Some minutes later, at 21h25, the deponent went to his apartment to do a further check, he having done that together with ROB who intended to do the same with his two girls. "

"By the way, he clarifies that that news had been communicated to all the friends who were in the Tapas by KM subsequent to her having personally been to her flat to check that her children were well.

The question asked, he relates that she had gone there alone to do that at 21:50. "

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MATTHEW-OLDFIELD-10MAY.htm

Name: Russell James O'Brien
Date: 2007/05/11

"Around 21h25, taking advantage of a pause in the service of the first plate, the deponent left the restaurant with Matthew Oldfield to check on the children."

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/RUSSELL-OBRIEN.htm
« Last Edit: February 02, 2016, 03:39:38 PM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.