Author Topic: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case  (Read 99400 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case
« Reply #45 on: February 08, 2016, 02:10:46 PM »
Everyone is entitled to an opinion, being unwilling to listen and counter opposing views is little pointless in a discussion forum.

exactly but using  passive agressive arguments/emotional blackmail  like   for the last 9 years we have tortured the  grieving   parents  of a missing child doesnt do anything for me because they are the main cause of her  vanishing  and also dont most   supporters and the mcanns  believe maddie is alive? grief is when someone dies...

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case
« Reply #46 on: February 08, 2016, 02:20:39 PM »
I was leaving that as an exercise for the readers.

As I have repeatedly said.... Imo.. Sceptics simply do not understand the evidence
If they did they would understand exactly why Posters support the McCanns

Offline Eleanor

Re: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case
« Reply #47 on: February 08, 2016, 02:24:49 PM »
exactly but using  passive agressive arguments/emotional blackmail  like   for the last 9 years we have tortured the  grieving   parents  of a missing child doesnt do anything for me because they are the main cause of her  vanishing  and also dont most   supporters and the mcanns  believe maddie is alive? grief is when someone dies...

Grief can be felt when a child is lost to an unknown fate.

I believe that Madeleine could well be alive.  We have nothing to suggest otherwise.
« Last Edit: February 08, 2016, 03:18:26 PM by Angelo222 »

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case
« Reply #48 on: February 08, 2016, 02:46:02 PM »
They are ruled out because there is no evidence against them
That's it...... Simple
« Last Edit: February 08, 2016, 04:24:06 PM by John »

Offline G-Unit

Re: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case
« Reply #49 on: February 08, 2016, 02:51:20 PM »
As I have repeatedly said.... Imo.. Sceptics simply do not understand the evidence
If they did they would understand exactly why Posters support the McCanns

Are you inferring that sceptics have such a limited mental capacity that they are unable to understand what people with your enviable mental abilities understand? I have asked before and I'm asking again. Put it to the test and explain just what it is that we are unable to understand. I for one am always open to being educated and having my mind stretched.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case
« Reply #50 on: February 08, 2016, 02:52:54 PM »
Are you inferring that sceptics have such a limited mental capacity that they are unable to understand what people with your enviable mental abilities understand? I have asked before and I'm asking again. Put it to the test and explain just what it is that we are unable to understand. I for one am always open to being educated and having my mind stretched.

i love learning life is learning

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case
« Reply #51 on: February 08, 2016, 02:53:49 PM »
Are you inferring that sceptics have such a limited mental capacity that they are unable to understand what people with your enviable mental abilities understand? I have asked before and I'm asking again. Put it to the test and explain just what it is that we are unable to understand. I for one am always open to being educated and having my mind stretched.

Unfortunately, we have seen these pattern of behaviour on many occasions, and it is riddled with illogic.

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case
« Reply #52 on: February 08, 2016, 02:55:15 PM »
Unfortunately, we have seen these pattern of behaviour on many occasions, and it is riddled with illogic.

i personally  dont like people  with closed minds   i was brought up to think for myself   

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case
« Reply #53 on: February 08, 2016, 03:22:10 PM »
Can I ask - do you believe that Robert Murat has been ruled out?
« Last Edit: February 08, 2016, 04:27:15 PM by John »

Offline Angelo222

Re: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case
« Reply #54 on: February 08, 2016, 03:25:44 PM »
They are ruled out because there is no evidence against them
That's it...... Simple

To rule someone out as a suspect requires irrefutable evidence of their non participation in a crime.  We do not have that in this case, all three arguidos (suspects) had that status removed because of a lack of evidence and not because they were proved innocent.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Angelo222

Re: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case
« Reply #55 on: February 08, 2016, 03:28:24 PM »
Can I ask - do you believe that Robert Murat has been ruled out?

Ruled out of what exactly?
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case
« Reply #56 on: February 08, 2016, 03:30:44 PM »
Ruled out of what exactly?
Involvement in Madeleine's disappearance - what else?

Offline jassi

Re: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case
« Reply #57 on: February 08, 2016, 03:34:09 PM »
Hasn't everyone been ruled out so far?
Has anyone been ruled in ?
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline G-Unit

Re: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case
« Reply #58 on: February 08, 2016, 03:44:40 PM »
Can I ask - do you believe that Robert Murat has been ruled out?

I don't believe that anyone has been 'ruled out'. It's supporters who keep insisting the Mccanns have been 'ruled out'. I am asking them to explain how that was accomplished.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Jean-Pierre

Re: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case
« Reply #59 on: February 08, 2016, 03:47:22 PM »
I don't believe that anyone has been 'ruled out'. It's supporters who keep insisting the Mccanns have been 'ruled out'. I am asking them to explain how that was accomplished.

Just remind me of the McCanns legal status vis a vis this case? 

Was I asleep when they were arrested and charged?