Author Topic: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case  (Read 99282 times)

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case
« Reply #105 on: February 08, 2016, 06:40:17 PM »
Does that equate to the mccanns displaying 'responsible parenting skills' ? 8**8:/:
That makes no sense, sorry.

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case
« Reply #106 on: February 08, 2016, 06:47:01 PM »
Re: the bit in bold above - so why does that make you happy? 
As for the question - you bet I was!!  Delighted.


Why  are you delighted  by it ..  you are over emotionally involved in the  McCann case imo btw I'm on my iPad just in case  it auto corrects

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case
« Reply #107 on: February 08, 2016, 06:48:26 PM »
Re: the bit in bold above - so why does that make you happy? 
As for the question - you bet I was!!  Delighted.

Of course you were happy, just like gerry and kate mccann. 8)-)))

......and of course that case would never have happened but for that pair.

As to Redwood, I predicted right at the start once I heard it was 'abduction or bust' they would find nothing.

Hall of course is a specialist in murder cases.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case
« Reply #108 on: February 08, 2016, 06:49:46 PM »
That makes no sense, sorry.

I presume you understand sarcasm.

After all alfred, but for the mccanns 'responsible parenting skills', these threads would not exist, would they.

 8(0(*

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case
« Reply #109 on: February 08, 2016, 06:51:24 PM »
I presume you understand sarcasm.

After all alfred, but for the mccanns 'responsible parenting skills', these threads would not exist, would they.

 8(0(*

he will never admit that

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case
« Reply #110 on: February 08, 2016, 06:52:39 PM »
he will never admit that


That would be rather unlikely.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case
« Reply #111 on: February 08, 2016, 06:53:55 PM »

Why  are you delighted  by it ..  you are over emotionally involved in the  McCann case imo btw I'm on my iPad just in case  it auto corrects
I was delighted because Amaral's book was rubbish, designed to get back at the McCanns who he perceived had ruined his life, it was vindictive, libellous, inaccurate and made him hundreds of thousands of pounds off the back of a missing child.  That's why I was delighted when the judgement went against him.  It also delighted me that the judgement so upset his rather grotesque little fan club.

 Put it this way.  I was as delighted with the result as you would have been had it gone his way and the McCanns had been ruined instead.  And don't try and pretend you wouldn't have been. 

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case
« Reply #112 on: February 08, 2016, 06:55:04 PM »
Of course you were happy, just like gerry and kate mccann. 8)-)))

......and of course that case would never have happened but for that pair.

As to Redwood, I predicted right at the start once I heard it was 'abduction or bust' they would find nothing.

Hall of course is a specialist in murder cases.

So, you are happy that you were proved right, never mind about Madeleine or justice or anything like that.  I see,  I have no idea what your last sentence refers to.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case
« Reply #113 on: February 08, 2016, 06:56:02 PM »
I presume you understand sarcasm.

After all alfred, but for the mccanns 'responsible parenting skills', these threads would not exist, would they.

 8(0(*
I understand sarcasm but I didn't understand what your comment under mine was meant to communicate.  It was a non sequitur as so many of your replies to my posts seem to be.

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case
« Reply #114 on: February 08, 2016, 06:56:10 PM »
I was delighted because Amaral's book was rubbish, designed to get back at the McCanns who he perceived had ruined his life, it was vindictive, libellous, inaccurate and made him hundreds of thousands of pounds off the back of a missing child.  That's why I was delighted when the judgement went against him.  It also delighted me that the judgement so upset his rather grotesque little fan club.

 Put it this way.  I was as delighted with the result as you would have been had it gone his way and the McCanns had been ruined instead.  And don't try and pretend you wouldn't have been.

Didn't upset me I'm not emotionally involved like that

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case
« Reply #115 on: February 08, 2016, 06:57:54 PM »
Didn't upset me I'm not emotionally involved like that
Well bully for you.  Strange that you are not emotionally involved in this case after 8 solid years of commenting on it, what are you getting out of it then?

Offline jassi

Re: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case
« Reply #116 on: February 08, 2016, 06:59:23 PM »
Didn't upset me I'm not emotionally involved like that


Nor me, but has been mentioned earlier,  only supporters are so emotionally involved.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case
« Reply #117 on: February 08, 2016, 07:00:01 PM »
Didn't upset me I'm not emotionally involved like that

The sceptics claim to support free speech... But will not want this post to stay on the thread
« Last Edit: February 08, 2016, 07:30:19 PM by Slartibartfast »

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case
« Reply #118 on: February 08, 2016, 07:01:02 PM »

Nor me, but has been mentioned earlier,  only supporters are so emotionally involved.

unhealthily  imo

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Why are some people so averse to parental involvement in this case
« Reply #119 on: February 08, 2016, 07:01:41 PM »
So, you are happy that you were proved right, never mind about Madeleine or justice or anything like that.  I see,  I have no idea what your last sentence refers to.

Cliche, after cliche, after cliche.

You can't find evidence if none exists, can you alfred ?

As to justice, this case shows no signs of being solved.

...and your idea of 'justice'  is keeping the mccanns out of the firing line.

As to the last sentence, let's try and make it simple.

THESE THREADS WOULD NOT EXIST, BUT FOR THE MCCANNS ACTIONS. 8)-)))