Why don't people believe the Mccanns story of Abduction ?

[Mr Gray]

Has anyone come up with a convincing abduction theory yet?
One which acknowledges the police and Mr Hill saying there was no sign of a break in.

why would there be any signs of a break in if the patio doors were open

[Brietta]

There are two workable alternative theories.

Either of which you will not accept.

As to ABDUCTION, there is no evidence to take to court and if you think there is ....

                   I believe I may have mentioned both.

If you are so convinced that Madeleine was not abducted ... surely you cannot be shy about explaining what evidence led you to that conclusion.

[Mr Gray]

There are two workable alternative theories.

Either of which you will not accept.

As to ABDUCTION, there is no evidence to take to court and if you think there is ....

there is no workable theory that involves the parents

[G-Unit]

So you can see absolutely no difference between leaving your children in a daytime crèche with numerous nannies in attendance and leaving your children alone in a bedroom at night with one individual nanny in attendance?  Fair enough.  That's your opinion, but believe it or not, not everyone thinks and feels the same way as you do.  What you may deem to be illogical, may not be so to others.  Which is all by the by because it does not explain why this decision on their part makes you think they made up an abduction story...

Which would you choose? Leaving your small children home alone in an unlocked apartment or using a trained child care worker to baby-sitter?

You really should know by now that no one incident or decision made me doubt the McCann's story. There are many things with a cumulative effect, adding up to a body of evidence which casts serious doubt upon their version of events.

[Alice Purjorick]

why would there be any signs of a break in if the patio doors were open

OK then off you go........ come up with a convincing theory using the open patio door.
See my earlier post on the topic about page 4 on here.

[stephen25000]

                   I believe I may have mentioned both.

If you are so convinced that Madeleine was not abducted ... surely you cannot be shy about explaining what evidence led you to that conclusion.

Wow that was amazing.

A suitable choice of a catchphrase from a fictional series.

Ideal for the 'abduction'.

As believable as the investigation of the Victoria Beckham lookalike . £4%4% %£5&% %£5&%

[Alfred R Jones]

Has anyone come up with a convincing abduction theory yet?
One which acknowledges the police and Mr Hill saying there was no sign of a break in.

yup.

[slartibartfast]

So you can see absolutely no difference between leaving your children in a daytime crèche with numerous nannies in attendance and leaving your children alone in a bedroom at night with one individual nanny in attendance?  Fair enough.  That's your opinion, but believe it or not, not everyone thinks and feels the same way as you do.  What you may deem to be illogical, may not be so to others.  Which is all by the by because it does not explain why this decision on their part makes you think they made up an abduction story...

Well either the Nannies/Baby Sitters are properly security checked or not. In this country we have had a number of cases of "responsible" adults in child care centres getting up to some fairly nasty stuff.

[Alfred R Jones]

Which would you choose? Leaving your small children home alone in an unlocked apartment or using a trained child care worker to baby-sitter?

You really should know by now that no one incident or decision made me doubt the McCann's story. There are many things with a cumulative effect, adding up to a body of evidence which casts serious doubt upon their version of events.

Why have you now moved the goalposts?  I asked why the McCanns decision not to use a babysitter had any bearing on your refusal to accept the McCanns version of events.  It seems you can't offer a plausible reason, beyond "just because..."

[G-Unit]

Why have you now moved the goalposts?  I asked why the McCanns decision not to use a babysitter had any bearing on your refusal to accept the McCanns version of events.  It seems you can't offer a plausible reason, beyond "just because..."

OK. In words of one syllable. It is just one of the many things done and said by the McCanns which cause doubt. If you want to know all of them they are in the threads on the forum, I don't have a list to hand.

[Mr Gray]

OK. In words of one syllable. It is just one of the many things done and said by the McCanns which cause doubt. If you want to know all of them they are in the threads on the forum, I don't have a list to hand.

extremely subjective

[Alfred R Jones]

OK. In words of one syllable. It is just one of the many things done and said by the McCanns which cause doubt. If you want to know all of them they are in the threads on the forum, I don't have a list to hand.

How rude you are.   Why should this specific decision cause any doubt about their honesty and integrity?  There is no reason, it's just that you have chosen to criticise every single one of their decisions because you enjoy doing so, it's a shame you can't be honest and admit it!

[Alfred R Jones]

Well either the Nannies/Baby Sitters are properly security checked or not. In this country we have had a number of cases of "responsible" adults in child care centres getting up to some fairly nasty stuff.

And there are very many more examples of children being abused when left alone with a solitary adult.  Your point is...?

[slartibartfast]

And there are very many more examples of children being abused when left alone with a solitary adult.  Your point is...?

Security checked adults?

[G-Unit]

How rude you are.   Why should this specific decision cause any doubt about their honesty and integrity?  There is no reason, it's just that you have chosen to criticise every single one of their decisions because you enjoy doing so, it's a shame you can't be honest and admit it!

I think you could give me lessons in rudeness Alfred! I have said what I think and if you disagree fair enough, I wouldn't expect you to criticise them no matter what they did. I'm not dishonest and don't have anything to admit, so please don't accuse me of lying.