Author Topic: A Good, Bad or Average Theory What's The Difference?  (Read 3308 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: A Good, Bad or Average Theory What's The Difference?
« Reply #390 on: December 05, 2019, 05:38:16 PM »
Thought there was some report of guy languishing in German prison, not that he was necessarily a German national,  though I may be confused, as persons of interest seem to come and go as each one proves , in reality, to be of no interest.
Thatís reality for all of them is it?  And you know this how?
"The answer is that no-one here believes the parents were directly involved in MM's disappearance" - G-Unit.

Offline jassi

Re: A Good, Bad or Average Theory What's The Difference?
« Reply #391 on: December 05, 2019, 06:24:52 PM »
Thatís reality for all of them is it?  And you know this how?

Yup
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -   Into year 13 and still no solution.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: A Good, Bad or Average Theory What's The Difference?
« Reply #392 on: December 05, 2019, 08:10:55 PM »
"The answer is that no-one here believes the parents were directly involved in MM's disappearance" - G-Unit.

Offline sadie

Re: A Good, Bad or Average Theory What's The Difference?
« Reply #393 on: Today at 12:21:14 AM »
To be fair in the absence of an English transcript, it is a very good guess.  Since as far as I can make out Amaral has dedicated himself to pushing that particular theme since 2007 using various theories which although patently nonsensical are avidly accepted by his following.

The 'swingers' ... the tennis bag ... the fridge ... and that is just for starters.

I sometimes wonder if people ' in the know', as Amaral almost certainly will be, have learned that someone, some people, are about to be charged with abduction etc?     

So best to forget his previous totally incorrect theories pushed ... and back off from these theories and accusations against The Mccanns.   


In other words cover his back?   Best to go along with the latest police position?  Maybe he fears that there will be a backlash against him ... or worse?


I have seen it happen on here before, when something important, illustrating the Polices belief in the innocence of The Mccanns, has happened in this case.   Then some posters have stopped accusing The Mccanns, but still get at them in a subtle way.
« Last Edit: Today at 12:23:50 AM by sadie »

Offline sadie

Re: A Good, Bad or Average Theory What's The Difference?
« Reply #394 on: Today at 12:42:56 AM »
Or he simply believed what he was told, that the woman threw herself down the stairs.
https://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2009/05/cirpriano-casepj-inspectors-accused-at.html

A fairly senior Police Officer lying to The Courts ?   To the detriment of the accused?  Changing the Course of Justice?   


No way.  What are you thinking about praising Amaral for such a heinious crime ?

Offline sadie

Re: A Good, Bad or Average Theory What's The Difference?
« Reply #395 on: Today at 12:53:10 AM »
I remember at the time of the interview when Amaral first mentioned the German pedophile, that to me it sounded as if the man in question had been arrested but not necessarily charged.  As a result, I thought it may have related to a pedophile called Andreas V - who at that time had recently been arrested but not yet found guilty - images of him are scarce but he does look a bit like the thick set Smithman e-fit.  What did stand out about him is that 1. The trial documented about 1000 cases of abuse in German starting from 2008...so I wonder where he was before that.  2.  Pre-trial the police 'lost' a LOT of the evidence.  3. A bit like Raymond Hewlett he lived like a traveller. 4. He was able to foster a 6 year old female child even though there were years of rumours about him and children.  5. His victims were mostly girls and also very young victims.   Anyhow, we will have to wait and see if it is him.   Although, I did think it was interesting that Amaral dropped in the similarity to Gerry....it is almost as if he is making sure that if it turns out that the guy in question is the abductor, that he should be forgiven for his assumption that the abductor was Gerry.

Covering his back ?