Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 243498 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online Eleanor

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #4590 on: November 04, 2018, 04:01:07 PM »
https://mobile.twitter.com/KingOfHits/status/1059026246737256448

https://annaraccoon.com/2010/06/05/intimidation-and-coercion/

http://matthewscott.org.uk/tackling-hate-crime-is-important

I have known about Anna Raccoon for a long time.

What your Link doesn't say is that Anna Raccoon uncovered a lot of false information about Jimmy Savile.  Often downright lies.

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #4591 on: November 04, 2018, 04:52:19 PM »
I have known about Anna Raccoon for a long time.

What your Link doesn't say is that Anna Raccoon uncovered a lot of false information about Jimmy Savile.  Often downright lies.

Sad to hear she had died.
It is a lack of contrition that makes a person who has done wrong fixate on being proven blameless.

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #4592 on: November 05, 2018, 08:13:03 PM »
This one has just taken a bit longer than first we thought.  But then Jimmy Savile was already dead, so couldn't fight back.

Jimmy Saviie had accusations made against him form many quarters of the country by children who were not believed or were shuushed!

Many people in the BBC knew about his  predatory sexual abuse of children for years and covered it up. Or stood by the status to keep their jobs. The most shocking revelation was Esther Ranzen calimong oh she heard rumours but did nothing? what really> you couldn't tip off the police or anything? what really?

To say this is a figment of MWT imagination  to spout Saviles crimes is a disgrace. and slaps in the face the victims of his crimes.  I am very well aware of his crimes from people who did KNOW and nothing was done to stop him.

So what he can't defend himself-  many people are worried their names will crop up!

What MWT did do was to cast aspersions on people as he believed in his own 'powers of detection' were also involved with a 'ring'.  The wrong accusations against innocent men is equally vile- he should be imprisioned for that alone!
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Carana

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #4593 on: November 05, 2018, 10:55:31 PM »
Sad to hear she had died.

Me, too. I always found her to be a scrupulous researcher and a decent person, whether I agreed with her on the topic of the day or not.

Offline Lace

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #4594 on: November 09, 2018, 04:55:17 PM »
Me, too. I always found her to be a scrupulous researcher and a decent person, whether I agreed with her on the topic of the day or not.

I agree Carana,   very good researcher,   she will be missed.

Offline barrier

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #4595 on: November 10, 2018, 10:34:00 AM »
I see disgraced is not just a word for the sole reserve to be used on of Mr Amaral,heaven forbid the Mail describes a former MET chief of being disgraced,yep a former head of the MET who'd have ever thunk it.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6373499/Disgraced-former-Met-Police-chief-Ali-Dizaei-parties-Hollywood-good-friend-Mel-Gibson.html
Ah,but I may as well try and catch the wind.

Online Eleanor

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #4596 on: November 10, 2018, 11:51:42 AM »
I see disgraced is not just a word for the sole reserve to be used on of Mr Amaral,heaven forbid the Mail describes a former MET chief of being disgraced,yep a former head of the MET who'd have ever thunk it.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6373499/Disgraced-former-Met-Police-chief-Ali-Dizaei-parties-Hollywood-good-friend-Mel-Gibson.html

Dizael lost his job and spent four years in prison.  Who'd a thunk it?

And he lost his Pension.
« Last Edit: November 10, 2018, 12:07:13 PM by Eleanor »

Online Davel

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #4597 on: November 10, 2018, 12:14:58 PM »
I see disgraced is not just a word for the sole reserve to be used on of Mr Amaral,heaven forbid the Mail describes a former MET chief of being disgraced,yep a former head of the MET who'd have ever thunk it.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6373499/Disgraced-former-Met-Police-chief-Ali-Dizaei-parties-Hollywood-good-friend-Mel-Gibson.html

There are obviously more disgraced criminally convicted police officers.. Amaral is just one of them
UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED ALL POSTS ARE MY OPINION

Online pathfinder73

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #4598 on: November 10, 2018, 03:38:55 PM »
Amaral left on his own accord and wasn't dismissed for being a disgrace like Ali Dizaei. The McCanns mistake was to take him on.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Online Davel

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #4599 on: November 10, 2018, 03:46:49 PM »
Amaral left on his own accord and wasn't dismissed for being a disgrace like Ali Dizaei. The McCanns mistake was to take him on.

still disgraced for having a criminal record...the mccanns mistake was thinking they would get justice in portugal
UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED ALL POSTS ARE MY OPINION

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #4600 on: November 10, 2018, 05:11:13 PM »
still disgraced for having a criminal record...the mccanns mistake was thinking they would get justice in portugal
What kind of justice were you thinking of?  they were not charged with anything.

 Infact, they were teated very differently from what they would expect if the 'crime' did happen in the UK. That is a fact!  They would be automatically be designated as suspects, and their socialising while leaving children alone(and one to disappear) would certainly not have accured sympathy or vasts sums of money. Their company in the name of their child- who would have no benefit from- would have been treated with a different set of moral standards. Would they sue a police officer in the UK for discussing what may have happened? Oh I don't think so.

They did very very well, since their daughters disppearance...
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline barrier

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #4601 on: November 10, 2018, 06:15:06 PM »
Dizael lost his job and spent four years in prison.  Who'd a thunk it?

And he lost his Pension.

He trumps Amaral though,good to see which force is the most  disgraceful.
Ah,but I may as well try and catch the wind.

Online Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #4602 on: November 10, 2018, 06:16:51 PM »
What kind of justice were you thinking of?  they were not charged with anything.

 Infact, they were teated very differently from what they would expect if the 'crime' did happen in the UK. That is a fact!  They would be automatically be designated as suspects, and their socialising while leaving children alone(and one to disappear) would certainly not have accured sympathy or vasts sums of money. Their company in the name of their child- who would have no benefit from- would have been treated with a different set of moral standards. Would they sue a police officer in the UK for discussing what may have happened? Oh I don't think so.

They did very very well, since their daughters disppearance...
Very, very well in what sense?

Online Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #4603 on: November 10, 2018, 06:19:27 PM »
I see disgraced is not just a word for the sole reserve to be used on of Mr Amaral,heaven forbid the Mail describes a former MET chief of being disgraced,yep a former head of the MET who'd have ever thunk it.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6373499/Disgraced-former-Met-Police-chief-Ali-Dizaei-parties-Hollywood-good-friend-Mel-Gibson.html
Amaral must be green wiith envy - when’s he getting his invite to Hollywood?

Offline Lace

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #4604 on: November 12, 2018, 11:29:34 AM »
What kind of justice were you thinking of?  they were not charged with anything.

 Infact, they were teated very differently from what they would expect if the 'crime' did happen in the UK. That is a fact!  They would be automatically be designated as suspects, and their socialising while leaving children alone(and one to disappear) would certainly not have accured sympathy or vasts sums of money. Their company in the name of their child- who would have no benefit from- would have been treated with a different set of moral standards. Would they sue a police officer in the UK for discussing what may have happened? Oh I don't think so.

They did very very well, since their daughters disppearance...

Quote -  They did very very well since their daughters disappearance  end of quote.

Oh yes,   they were made arguidos,   Kate has gone back to work and Madeleine is still missing,  very very well I don't think so.