Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 569028 times)

0 Members and 19 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline sadie

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7545 on: February 14, 2020, 03:10:59 AM »
You seem to be baiting me to conjure forth Thomas Carlyle and the 'valetism' of the hero.
It's too late for that, but I see where you're coming from.

After several viscious posts baiting VS, I think that you got that the wrong way round.

The evidence is in your posts above.   Pretentious nonsence

Offline The General

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7546 on: February 14, 2020, 07:18:59 AM »
After several viscious posts baiting VS, I think that you got that the wrong way round.

The evidence is in your posts above.   Pretentious nonsence
Theories involving Zionist paedophile rings returning to snatch their waning bloodline?
Youngest Member of the Forum

Offline Davel

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7547 on: February 14, 2020, 07:21:23 AM »
Theories involving Zionist paedophile rings returning to snatch their waning bloodline?
In the style of some sceptics... Has this theory been proved wrong
It must upset posters that it now looks as though I was right all along

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7548 on: February 14, 2020, 07:55:57 AM »
Happy Valentine’s Day everyone.   Big love to all my fellow worthless enablers xxxxx
“we have carried out a very serious investigation and there is no indication whatsoever Madeleine McCann's parents are linked to her disappearance” - Hans Christian Wolters, German Prosecutor..

“Conspiracy theories exhibit a strong obsession with detail, often taking the form of highlighting a tiny piece of evidence and blowing it up out of all proportion, buttressing their claims with a display of pseudo-scholarship.  When they examine the real evidence, conspiracy theorists do not accept that minor inconsistencies come from mistakes in reporting.” Sir Richard J Evans, author and historian

Offline The General

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7549 on: February 14, 2020, 07:56:14 AM »
I have obviously missed the explanation of the term " enablers" .
Who are "enablers"?
Who are 'sceptics'? Lazy, catch-all labels can be used by all.
Youngest Member of the Forum

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7550 on: February 14, 2020, 07:57:35 AM »
I have obviously missed the explanation of the term " enablers" .
Who are "enablers"?
You are, I am, Misty is.  We enable evil deeds to go unpunished, we are therefore presumably  evil ourselves.  Great innit? 
“we have carried out a very serious investigation and there is no indication whatsoever Madeleine McCann's parents are linked to her disappearance” - Hans Christian Wolters, German Prosecutor..

“Conspiracy theories exhibit a strong obsession with detail, often taking the form of highlighting a tiny piece of evidence and blowing it up out of all proportion, buttressing their claims with a display of pseudo-scholarship.  When they examine the real evidence, conspiracy theorists do not accept that minor inconsistencies come from mistakes in reporting.” Sir Richard J Evans, author and historian

Offline Davel

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7551 on: February 14, 2020, 08:01:26 AM »
Who are 'sceptics'? Lazy, catch-all labels can be used by all.

sceptics are those who beleive there is  a very high probablity...or possibility.. that the McCanns have lied about important details re this case. It really is that simple.
It must upset posters that it now looks as though I was right all along

Offline Erngath

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7552 on: February 14, 2020, 08:03:31 AM »
Who are 'sceptics'? Lazy, catch-all labels can be used by all.

The terms " sceptics" and "supporters" are ones which have been accepted by the powers that be, as far as the forum rules dictate.
Obviously the term "sceptic" is self explanatory as "sceptics" are sceptical about Madeleine being abducted.
"Supporters" support the theory that Madeleine was abducted.
What do the "enablers" enable and is this a term used by just you or have I missed it being used by other posters?
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Davel

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7553 on: February 14, 2020, 08:05:40 AM »
The terms " sceptics" and "supporters" are ones which have been accepted by the powers that be, as far as the forum rules dictate.
Obviously the term "sceptic" is self explanatory as "sceptics" are sceptical about Madeleine being abducted.
"Supporters" support the theory that Madeleine was abducted.
What do the "enablers" enable and is this a term used by just you or have I missed it being used by other posters?

Its  a word coined by the General so that he can criticise the use of the word sceptic without being accused of using the word supporter...
It must upset posters that it now looks as though I was right all along

Offline Eleanor

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7554 on: February 14, 2020, 08:11:40 AM »

Any further use of the word "Enablers" will be Deleted.  This is not a criticism of all.  We have already done this one and already warned about this.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7555 on: February 14, 2020, 08:17:53 AM »
Who are 'sceptics'? Lazy, catch-all labels can be used by all.
yeah, like “man”, “woman”, “Belieber”, etc. 
“we have carried out a very serious investigation and there is no indication whatsoever Madeleine McCann's parents are linked to her disappearance” - Hans Christian Wolters, German Prosecutor..

“Conspiracy theories exhibit a strong obsession with detail, often taking the form of highlighting a tiny piece of evidence and blowing it up out of all proportion, buttressing their claims with a display of pseudo-scholarship.  When they examine the real evidence, conspiracy theorists do not accept that minor inconsistencies come from mistakes in reporting.” Sir Richard J Evans, author and historian

Offline Lace

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7556 on: February 14, 2020, 09:14:29 AM »
Happy Valentine’s Day everyone.   Big love to all my fellow worthless enablers xxxxx

Happy Valentine's Day Vertigo  Big love to you too   @)(++(*

Offline The General

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7557 on: February 14, 2020, 09:34:00 AM »
Any further use of the word "Enablers" will be Deleted.  This is not a criticism of all.  We have already done this one and already warned about this.
Are we deleting sceptic too? Or just enabler?
Youngest Member of the Forum

Offline Brietta

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7558 on: February 14, 2020, 09:46:00 AM »
Are we deleting sceptic too? Or just enabler?
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=7060.msg573943#msg573943

Don't you bother to read posts? ... the above is explanatory and accurate, please take it on board.
The remit of Operation Grange is to investigate ...  "(as if the abduction occurred in the UK)"

Offline Eleanor

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7559 on: February 14, 2020, 09:51:59 AM »
Are we deleting sceptic too? Or just enabler?

Sceptic and Supporter are titles designated by John.  You know John, The Forum Owner.  I should try that one on with him if you want a discussion on the subject.

Enablers will be Deleted and could attract Large Warning Points.  So if the rest of you could cease to reply to any comment containing the word Enablers then this would be sensible.